The differences between the Old Soviet Union and Barack Obama’s America are dwindling away. This should be disturbing to all Americans, but there are actually a certain percentage of our people (Romney’s 47%) who believe 1984’s “Freedom is Slavery” motto and are happy being led around like farm animals. If you think we have been losing our freedoms, you’re right. A recent American Thinker article, by a Russian émigré now living in the San Francisco area, paints a portrait of a drab suffocating existence under Communist rule (and made some solid comparisons between our lives today and the way he lived in Russia.)

While we are still far away from life under actual commissars, the numbers of similarities are already frightening.

The writer wrote: “In the USSR, we had state-controlled media which shaped the narrative entirely.” Is there any difference between what ABC and CBS etcetera say?

Lenin was portrayed as a noble charismatic and smart man who championed the underdog – working class – who was a warrior against the wealthy. Lenin’s face was everywhere; any differences here?

Medicines were hard to find; sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

The economic numbers the Russian people were given were fake; just as our unemployment and “Hey! The economy is almost there!” reports each month.

No matter how hard his parents worked, they could not raise his expected standard of living. Very much like in Obama’s America.

The “free healthcare” in the old Soviet Union was a disaster, as it is quickly becoming here.

Grade school kids were indoctrinated with love for Lenin and the Soviet state. Remember the videos of American school kids singing songs in praise of Barack Obama?

The Soviet State owned and ran the two car production factories, while the Party bosses drove Mercedes Benz’s and American cars. Just as GM is owned by Obama and the UWA in combination.

Bad news was blacked out under the Soviets. The Chernobyl nuclear disaster was mentioned during a 15 second report. We need only look at the way inconvenient news like the IRS, Benghazi, or Fast and Furious criminal conspiracies have been ignored to see the similarities. Their two main “news” outlets, Pravda (truth) and Izvestia (delivered news), now report more truthful news about America than our fake media does.

In our society under Obama, poisonous anti-American propaganda overflows on college campuses, and idiots who have learned nothing from unionized fakes masquerading as teachers think America is the cause of all the world’s problems.

They cling to an old Soviet slogan “Forward,” without even understanding it means forward into slavery.




Because their corporate masters want millions of legal workers they can pay slave wages to, House Republicans are about to ignore the will of about two-thirds of their base and grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.

It was a sickening display during Tuesday’s State of the Union speech when House Republicans jumped to their feet en masse to applaud Obama’s call for an amnesty bill. There are now at least 84 Republicans who support an amnesty bill for illegals, meaning that with Democrat support, an amnesty bill is very likely to pass. You can read the rogues gallery here.

Conservative commentator Pat Buchanan warns that an immigration push will create a “Balkan war” in the Republican Party and that House Weeper John Boehner will lose his speakership over it. That, of course, will simply consign him and his tan to a lucrative seven-figure K Street career.

Conservative gadfly Ann Coulter gained a copy of an embargoed report by Phyllis Schlafly that shows how immigration is changing the country and will spell doom for the Republican Party, in addition to driving down wages and sending more Americans to the unemployment lines. The report shows immigrants have little in common economically, culturally or historically with Americans; that they overwhelming support big government social programs, gun control, affirmative action, gun registration and Obamacare; and that they have a negative view of free-market capitalism. In other words, they’re progressives.

But the Republican establishment doesn’t care, as long as their corporate masters are happy.

It’s past time that Americans who support the Republican Party understand the party’s elite give only lip service to small-government and conservative principals and that they are truly interested only in feathering their own nests and those of their sugar daddies.



Congress is very fond of two things: throwing a bunch of stuff into one bill and rushing bills through while Americans are focused on other news. While people were talking about the State of the Union, they’ve done it again with the $1 trillion farm bill.

The “farm bill” passed by the House yesterday has projected costs that are even greater than those of the Obama stimulus, and about 80 percent of the bill is just food stamps.

The bill is filled with special handouts to agriculture special interests and is a model of central planning. When it comes to food stamps, the bill is just as bad.

Food stamps should go to those truly in need. So it may surprise you to learn that you can qualify for food stamps even if you have millions in the bank. The new farm bill does nothing to address this absurd loophole.

A loophole like this undermines the legitimacy of the program and certainly does nothing to help people who really need help.

Food stamp recipients also aren’t required to work—a disservice to them and to the taxpayers who are assisting them. A work requirement empowers people, as we have seen with welfare reform.

So the food stamp program, with plenty of encouragement from the Obama Administration, has grown far beyond what it was supposed to be. Heritage expert Daren Bakst reports that “food stamp spending has quadrupled since [fiscal year] 2000 and doubled since 2008.”

The food stamp issue is not just about numbers. It’s about policy reform—developing policy that empowers Americans instead of creating a dependency that harms them.

Now this food stamp—er, farm—bill disaster goes to the Senate.


By Adina Kutnicki

Judge Makes Order To Investigate Obama’s Social Security Number

It took years for Watergate to unravel fully. The controversy over Barack Hussein Obama and his past, along with fraudulent documents continues to make headlines. Yet, the items needed to actually verify who Obama is continue to be kept from the public eye. Well, that all may be about to change. Attorney Orly Taitz may have just found a chink in the federal government’s armor in protecting Barack Obama from scrutiny, following a judge’s ruling over her Freedom of Information Act request from the Social Security Administration.

Taitz has claimed that Obama uses the Social Security number of Harry Bounel and has submitted several Freedom of Information Act requests for the information from the Social Security Administration. Each time, she has been met with stonewalling by the Social Security Administration.

However, Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander has ruled to give Taitz “an opportunity to file a second amended complaint and add allegations of SSA not doing a proper search and withholding records.”

From Taitz’s Press Release:

Judge Hollander in Maryland gives Attorney Orly Taitz 21 days to file a second amended complaint and add allegations in regards to an improper withholding by the Social Security Administration of records of Harry Bounel, whose Social security number is being illegally used by Barack Obama. When Taitz filed the complaint, SSA did not respond at all. After the law suit was filed, SSA responded by fraudulently claiming that the records were not found. Taitz responded that this is a fraudulent assertion, since the records were found before and denied to another petitioner due to privacy concerns, however Social Security has no right to claim privacy as according to their own 120 year rule they have a duty to release the records. The judge stated that the plaintiff Taitz might be correct, however at this time she cannot rule in her favor as her original complaint was filed before SSA responded, so the judge gave Taitz an opportunity to refile a second amended complaint and add new allegations, stating the SSA responded but improperly hidden the records . This is a great development. This all but assures that the judge will order the SSA to release the SS-5, Social Security application of resident of CT, Harrison (Harry) Bounel, whose CT SSN 042-68-4425 was stolen by Obama and used in Obama’s 2009 tax returns, which initially were posted on without proper redaction, without flattening of the file. Taitz will be very careful not to be Breitbarted or Fuddied in the next 21 days.

Additionally, there is an increased tampering with the web site of Orly Taitz and with her ability to send mass -emails. It seems her private server is somehow affected and Taitz is unable to send mass e-mails on two different programs.

It’s interesting that Taitz points out that she will be “careful not to be Breitbarted or Fuddied,” indicating that she believes that both Andrew Breitbart and Andrew Breitbart and Loretta Fuddy were targeted by Obama for assassination.” Breitbart died on the very day that he said he would begin vetting Obama for the 2012 elections, which raised suspicions. Fuddy, best remembered as being instrumental in issuing the Hawaii long-form birth certificate, was the only person to die aboard a small plane that crashed off the coast of Hawaii last week. Already, there are questions surrounding the narrative of her death.

Taitz alleged that Mr. Bounel was born in 1890, and therefore, under the “’120 Year Rule’ implemented by the SSA in 2010,” pertaining to “‘extremely aged individuals,’” Bounel’s “Social Security applications have to be released under FOIA without proof of [his] death . . . .”

The reason for the judge’s amendment seems to be a procedural one. Taitz filed suit with the court prior to receiving word back from her Freedom of Information Act request, which she did receive on July 29, 2013 from Dawn S. Wiggins, a Fredom of Information Officer. Wiggins replied to Taitz:

I have enclosed a copy of the SS-5s for Mr. Tsarnaev and Ms. Dunham. . . .

We were unable to find any information for Mr. Bounel based on the information you provided to us. Mr. Bounel may not have applied for a Social Security number (SSN) or may have given different information on the application for a number.

It appears that once the amendment is submitted, this may force the Social Security Administration to explain exactly what is going on with Barack Obama’s Social Security number.

We should know something about the case by the second week in January 2014.

It is within the above backdrop/prism that the mysterious death of Loretta Fuddy (Hawaii’s ex DOH Director) occurred, VERY SOON after Arpaio’s team announced criminally explosive findings re-eligibility. COINCIDENCE – OR NOT?

One also has to wonder: why precisely wasn’t the above preliminary decision (whatever the court finally decides, to hear the fraud case or not…truth be told, the judge will have her arms twisted…only the form it takes is anyone’s guess) SPLASHED all over the media’s airwaves? Don’t waste time thinking over this conundrum…what a head scratcher!

With these trails firmly in mind, the CRIME/HEIST OF THE CENTURY becomes Obama’s FORGED documents via his red/green accomplices, leading to an IMPERIAL Presidency!



Tens of thousands of undocumented immigrants under the age of 18 cross into the United States alone every year, a growing number that puts extra pressure on American lawmakers searching for an answer on how to reform immigration policy.

The US Conference of Catholic Bishops released a report Tuesday estimating that 60,000 minors will enter the US from Central America without adult supervision by the end of 2014. The fact that less than 25,000 unaccompanied minors traveled into the US in 2013 and under 6,000 in 2004 is a stark reminder of the violence throughout Mexico and elsewhere in Central America that seems to be behind the swell in arrivals to the US.

The Bishops group study, first obtained by the Wall Street Journal, cited a massive uptick in the number of stops at the US-Mexico border, which “has seen an unprecedented increase in the number of unaccompanied migrating children” since 2011.

The majority of the unaccompanied children (UACs) are released from the border patrol and into the arms of relatives or friends already in the US. Their cases are handled by a number of government agencies and, if an individual child is not lost in the mix, they are often placed in the care of the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Refugee Resettlement division.

“Generalized violence at the state and local levels and a corresponding breakdown of the rule of law have threatened citizen security and created a culture of fear and hopelessness,” the report states.

A vast number, 95 percent, come from Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador – three nations plagued by organized crime, drug trafficking, and widespread corruption. Kevin Appleby, director of migration policy and public affairs for the bishops group and an author of the report, told the Wall Street Journal that while the mass flow has created problems, the young refugees also represent a significantly different type of migrant to the US.

“These children defy common perception of migration in this hemisphere,” he said. “They are akin to refugees in Africa fleeing civil wars. They are literally fleeing for their lives.”

The report’s publication came on the same day that Republican lawmakers in the US House of Representatives debated a number of immigration reforms that would give citizenship to children whose parents brought them into America illegally and also stop the deportation of adults.

Republican leaders distributed a series of so-called principles for lower-ranked leaders to consider. Conditions an undocumented immigrant include a “rigorous” background check, “significant” back taxes, commitment to learn English, and ability to prove they can support themselves without government aid–and they must also be “willing to admit their culpability” by registering with the federal government, reports USA Today.

“I believe these standards represent a fair, principled way for us to solve this issue, beginning with securing our borders and enforcing our laws,” House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said during the meeting. “We will address this issue in a step-by-step, common sense fashion that starts with securing our nation’s borders and enforcing our nation’s laws.”

Still, sources told the New York Times that the closed-door meeting was “very passionate” and a “sizable bloc” of Republicans spoke out against Boehner and other top officials.

“It’s time to deal with it, but how you deal with it is critically important,” Boehner said. “It’s one thing to pass a law. It’s another thing to have the confidence of the American people behind that law.”

While lawmakers squabble over which reforms should be introduced, unaccompanied children will still be making their way up through Central America and into the US. One young man, identified only as Juan Cordoba, told WBEZ Chicago public radio that he had no choice but to flee and try to make a new life in the US.

“As we all know, Honduras has a lot of corruption problems, there’s a lot of violence, there’s not a lot of opportunities, and so as young people, we graduate and then you have no options, there’s no jobs available, there’s nothing,” he said.

The 17-year-old said it took him two months to make his way from Honduras and then across Mexico, but was disappointed when he approached US Border Patrol agents.

“It was really bad. They don’t treat you nice,” he said. “They don’t treat you like a human, they treat you like an animal. It was just not good.”