WHISTLEBLOWER CALLS FOR IMPEACHMENT OF OBAMA OVER NSA SPYING

William Binney says intelligence agencies are running government

by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON | JULY 30, 2014

NSA whistleblower William Binney is calling for a constitutional convention that would lead to the impeachment and prosecution of Barack Obama and everyone involved in the NSA spying scandal.

Binney, a former NSA employee with the signals intelligence agency within the DoD, told the Alex Jones Show that the mass surveillance of Americans was “destroying the foundation of this country” and that intelligence agencies were now running the government.

Binney likened the current situation to a, “Stasi-run government where the intelligence service basically determines a lot of the policy of the government and that’s what’s happening here – the intelligence community is more or less directing what the government is doing and how they do it.”

Binney said Obama and everyone involved in the NSA spying scandal should be impeached, adding, “We could do it without Washington being involved at all under article five of our constitution….have a state constitutional convention and we can write in changes to the constitution and ratify them at the same time.”

“Otherwise we ought to fire them, after all they’re the ones that got us to where we are….they should be fired,” added Binney.

Last year it emerged that lawmakers on Capitol Hill were approached as far back as 2004 and given the chance to have more oversight on NSA programs but refused to do so.

“We could have a special prosecutor appointed by the state and the people and give them the backing of the state police, the local police, as well as the National Guard in all the states so that they have the backing of the power of the state to appoint prosecutors to go after everyone in DC,” said the whistleblower.

Binney predicted that increasing awareness of the NSA’s corruption would inevitably lead to some form of uprising within the United States.

“I think there’s going to be a fundamental revolution coming because my sense is the people in America here are starting to wake up to this threat, they’re starting to realize the dangers of what’s going on,” said Binney, adding that he foresaw a grass roots revolution “to push these people to do the right thing.”

WHITE HOUSE BLOCKS ILLEGAL CHILDREN PETITION

Inoperable for more than 12 hours

by INFOWARS.COM | JULY 10, 2014

On Wednesday Infowars.com posted an Alex Jones petition calling for rich Democrats favoring amnesty to pay for the care of the latest influx of illegal immigrants.

The petition also demands immigrants be housed in Washington and on the grounds of the White House.

The petition was in limbo for more than 12 hours after it supposedly went live. Thousands of people tried to sign it but the so-called “We the People” website hosting the petition failed to make the petition form recognize and tally the signatures.

Either We the People: Your Voice in Our Government (sic) is akin to Healthcare.gov, the notoriously botched Obamacare website that cost “north of $600 million” to implement and fix (some claim it will ultimately cost over $1 billion), or somebody at the White House is fudging the numbers.

Unfortunately, those of you who tried to sign the petition yesterday will have to register a second time and click of an email link to have your signature appear on Obama’s kludgy website.

Here’s a link to the petition.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/let-unaccompanied-alien-children-live-white-house/gN4vlfd4

PETITION: LET’S PUT UP “UNACCOMPANIED” ILLEGALS AT WHITE HOUSE

It’s time Obama and Democrats take ownership of the problem

by INFOWARS.COM | JULY 9, 2014

In response to inaction by the Obama administration and the federal government to confront the tidal wave of illegal immigrants streaming over the border into Texas, Alex Jones and Infowars have posted a petition on the “We the People” page at the White House.

We demand Obama and Congress take responsibility for the unprecedented influx of so-called “unaccompanied minors” streaming across the border. Specifically, since there is no practical way at this point to prevent thousands of people daily from illegally crossing into the United States – short of militarizing the southern border – we demand Obama and Congress house the immigrants in Washington DC.

In order to make certain this effort does not impose additional burden on already seriously besieged American tax payers, we also demand Obama’s wealthy Democrat base pay for the housing and other needs of the impoverished illegal immigrants.

Additionally, other less wealthy Democrats who insist this event is now a refugee problem should also put their money where their mouths are and donate what they can to house and feed the children.

Prior to advent of large and stifling government, social problems were addressed by individuals, churches and other private organizations through charity. It is time to relive our past and get government out of our lives.

Let’s make sure Obama and the Democrats are not able to pass the buck and raid already seriously depleted federal coffers and force Americans to pay for this orchestrated effort to flood the country with dependents and undermine a shrinking middle class.

UC Professor: Immigration Influx is About ‘Re-Education’ of Society

UC Professor: Immigration Influx is About ‘Re-Education’ of Society

Hamamoto warns amnesty will lead to creation of subservient underclass

by Paul Joseph Watson | June 25, 2014

University of California Professor Darrell Y. Hamamoto warns that the influx of illegal immigrants into the United States is part of a plan to create a new underclass of people who can be re-educated in order to create a subservient underclass.

Hamamoto, a Professor of Asian American Studies at the University of California, Davis, exclusively contacted Infowars to express his shock at what he sees as a clear “plan to destroy national sovereignty” through mass uncontrolled illegal immigration.

Hamamoto warns that the influx of illegal immigrants into the U.S. and by extension into the college education system is part of a deliberate plot, “to exclude the American middle class from a UC education and create a new demographic of largely immigrant or foreign national undergraduate population that can be re-educated from the ground up and controlled much more readily.”

Hamamoto’s warning is noteworthy given his position at one of the most liberal institutions in the United States. The professor acknowledged that his vocal stance against illegal immigration has already prompted a backlash, but that he had no reservations in going public.

“I am fairly certain that this is also going on at UT and other “public” institutions of higher learning, so Infowars subscribers will “get it,” wrote Hamamoto. “Everyone else will be really pissed off at me….I am already being harassed by the administration and informed on by trained student-rats, so truly this is not a risk for me.”

The professor added that UC Davis, “is gearing up for what they call the “Hispanization” of the University of California, which means in-state or full-ride tuition to both illegals and the offspring of illegal immigrants.”

Seeking to draw more attention to the issue, Hamamoto is preparing to launch a stunt based around, “a campaign calling for racial “equality” by demanding that thirty million Asians of different nationalities (be) brought into the USA and integrated into the National Security Welfare State.”

Making reference to this week’s controversy surrounding the DHS’ purchase of 42,000 pairs of extra large underwear that are needed to clothe an influx of overweight illegal immigrants, Hamamoto writes, “One of my purposely ludicrous arguments will be that the US govt. will save hundreds of thousands of dollars buying XS-size underwear for Asians as opposed to XXXXXXL-size drawers for illegal immigrants from Central America.”

“La Raza, MeCha, and all the other ethno-nationalist interest groups will really get their pantalones in a bunch thanks to this campaign. This plan to destroy national sovereignty cannot be argued through rational means, so I will orchestrate a complete parody of this bogus crisis,” writes Hamamoto.

Professor Hamamoto will appear on the Alex Jones Show soon to discuss his campaign in more detail.

IN THE US: 4 MAJOR NEWS NETWORKS, ZERO BILDERBERG 2014 COVERAGE

IN THE US: 4 MAJOR NEWS NETWORKS, ZERO BILDERBERG 2014 COVERAGE

Full-on press blackout testament to dinosaur media’s growing irrelevance

In the US: 4 Major News Networks, Zero Bilderberg 2014 Coverage
by ADAN SALAZAR | INFOWARS | JUNE 1, 2014

With the exception of 24-hour cable news providers, Americans rely on 4 major television networks to deliver them information regarding important world events: ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox.

It is with predictable disappointment to announce all four networks failed to inform the public of a secretive and extremely exclusive meeting of central bankers, CEOs, public officials and world dignitaries taking place this weekend.

From May 29 through today, June 1, esteemed academicians, hand picked journalists, intelligence officials, world banking oligarchs and the CEOs and bosses of Royal Dutch Shell, Google and Microsoft, to name just a few, slinked behind closed doors at the Marriott hotel in Copenhagen, Denmark, to do God knows what.

But watching the major news networks and monitoring the domestic news wires, you’d never guess this meeting happened.

With the conference now into its fourth and final day, one would expect at least a trickle of articles from the mainstream press regarding Bilderberg 2014, if at the least to perform the routine mock, shame and ridicule of “tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists” claiming participants are working towards a “new world order.”

While past meetings have been afforded at least some press, this year neither of the four networks opted to cover Bilderberg 2014.

NBC was most upfront about it:

Other networks have awarded the meeting of elite power brokers press in the past, but for some reason didn’t find this year’s globalist shindig quite as enticing (click to enlarge):

cbs2

abc2

fox13

Indeed, the degree to which all four networks uniformly ignored the matter is a curious coincidence, leaving the door open for skeptics to argue they’ve been handed specific orders to disregard the assembly, colluding to perform what’s termed a “media blackout.”

“The reason they want secrecy is because they’re doing evil,” explained late veteran Bilderberg investigative journalist Jim Tucker. For decades, Tucker did tireless work attempting to expose the group, following them to multiple meeting locations around the globe and reporting on leaks concerning their un-official agendas. “Evil is done under the cover of darkness, good works are done in the sunshine.”

But surely, you ask, the top cable news network in the country, CNN, can devote at least a fraction of time or webspace to cover this important meeting? Nope. Are you kidding? They’re busy worrying about the next Clippers owner.

cnn2

To be fair, one of their hired propagandists, Jake Tapper, did do a superficial, surface report on the conference – last year – putting Bilderberg protestors on the same level as “bigfoot believers” and labeling Alex Jones a “provocateur.”

But surely the newspaper that carries “all the news that’s fit to print” would deem a meeting of elite power brokers “news”? Nope. Not this year.. Maybe that’s because some of its editors have attended past meetings.

“On its face, it makes no sense the corporate media would ignore and fail to report a confab comprised of newsworthy royal elites, chancellors, prime ministers, presidents, ambassadors, secretaries of state, Wall street bankers and investors, CEOs of transnational corporations, and corporate media executives,” writes Kurt Nimmo. “It makes no sense — that is until you realize the corporate media is owned and directed by this very same elite. In the past, darlings of the corporate media have attended Bilderberg meetings, including the late Peter Jennings of ABC, Joseph C. Harsch of NBC, the “liberal” Bill Moyers of PBS, the ‘conservative’ William F. Buckley, Jr., Robert L. Bartley of the Wall Street Journal, the neocon William Kristol, Thomas L. Friedman of the New York Times, the late Katharine Graham of the CIA’s favorite newspaper, the Washington Post, Leslie Stahl of CBS, and many others. Many are also members of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission.”

“Jim Tucker puts it best,” writes Michael Collins Piper for American Free Press. “If 140 of the world’s best known baseball players or movie stars gathered secretly under armed guard at an exclusive resort for an entire weekend, every major newspaper and magazine and all of the tabloids would be on hand, clamoring to get inside, demanding to know what was going on behind those closed doors. All of the television gossip shows would be chatting about it regularly. The whole world would know about that secret meeting in a heartbeat.”

Besides a limited number of American sites, and American sites owned by foreign governments, mainstream Bilderberg coverage this year has hovered around zero, a further indication of the dying dinosaur media’s increasing irrelevance.

But even if journalists ventured to Denmark, which Infowars reporters did, they wouldn’t get very far. Taxpayer-funded armed security details keep a 24-hour guard, huge eyesore fences block nosy journalists out and invitees are strictly forbidden from revealing anything discussed at meetings. Secrecy always trumps transparency at Bilderberg.

“I don’t think they’re happy about it, they prefer nothing at all, no publicity, they prefer absolute secrecy,” Tucker said in an interview, commenting on Bilderberg’s sentiments toward the growing media interest garnered in recent years.

The Bilderberg Group recently worked up the courage to put up a website.

wayback2

This gesture was in all likelihood spurred by incessant coverage from independent media, but it could also mean the group is now confident enough in their plans to move out from behind the curtain.

One thing’s certain.. Vice President Biden’s frequent hat tips to the “New world order” aren’t particularly reassuring.

But then again, maybe there is hope after all:

Former U.S. Diplomat: Send U.S. Ground Troops to Ukraine

Former U.S. Diplomat: Send U.S. Ground Troops to Ukraine

CFR member wants to heighten tension with Russia

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 15, 20145

A former U.S. diplomat and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, James Jeffrey, is calling for U.S. ground troops to be injected into the brewing civil war in Ukraine. Jeffery is a visiting fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a beltway think tank controlled by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and associated with the neocon wing of the Republican Party.

“The best way to send Putin a tough message and possibly deflect a Russian campaign against more vulnerable NATO states is to back up our commitment to the sanctity of NATO territory with ground troops, the only military deployment that can make such commitments unequivocal,” Jeffrey writes for The Washington Post, an establishment newspaper often used by neocons to push pro-war propaganda and the concept of American exceptionalism, the philosophical basis for imperialism and warmongering.

Jeffrey believes a relatively small number of U.S. ground troops deployed to Eastern European nations would result in a generalized mustering of troops in those countries. This would likely result in heightened tension and the possibility of confrontation with Russia.

Few in Congress have suggested sending troops into Ukraine. Arizona Senator John McCain and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, however, have suggested supporting the coup government by sending weapons.

“We call on President Obama, together with our NATO allies, to immediately fulfill the Ukrainian government’s request for military assistance,” the neocon duo stated on March 28. “This assistance should include small arms, ammunition, and defensive weapons, such as anti-armor and anti-aircraft systems – as well as critical non-lethal support, such as protective equipment, medical supplies, spare parts, and intelligence sharing.”

In addition to providing arms to the unelected junta, McCain and Graham said the Crimean referendum “must be a wake-up call to NATO. The alliance must urgently conduct contingency planning and military exercises to deter aggression and defend alliance members. We must shift additional NATO assets and capabilities eastward to support these contingency plans. We must increase NATO’s cooperation with, and support for, Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and other non-NATO partners.”

A poll conducted in early March shows a vast majority of Americans oppose sending troops to Ukraine. Only 12 percent support putting American troops on the ground, while 17 percent support air strikes, according to the CNN/ORC International poll.

This article was posted: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 at 2:15 pm