PBS Moderators Ignore Clinton Scandals

Screen Shot 2016-02-13 at 11.17.55 AM



So let me get this straight: on the same day that the Washington Post reports that the State Department issued subpoenas to a family foundation bearing Hillary Clinton’s name as part of a federal investigation, the PBS debate moderators didn’t ask her about it.

While presidential candidates

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) 97% has been asked about a loan from Goldman Sachs and Donald Trump about bankruptcies in his past (legitimate questions in my mind), a federal subpoena to a foundation where Hillary Clinton recently served on the board doesn’t even warrant a murmur from Gwen Ifill and Judy Woodruff, two PBS journalists?

As the Washington Post’s investigative unit reported just today, the State Department Inspector General issued subpoenas to the Clinton Foundation as part of a federal investigation. (Why did the Inspector General issue the subpoenas? Did the Clinton Foundation refuse to turn over relevant documents? It’s unclear at this point.) What is clear is that the State Department felt the need to obtain internal documents from the Clinton Foundation as part of their investigation.

It’s also clear that the Clinton Foundation is of interest to the American people. All day it was a ten top trending subject of Facebook, which was the cosponsor of the debate. But it was never mentioned by the debate moderators.

In addition to the ongoing email investigation by the FBI, we now know that the bureau is also investigating the Clinton Foundation. How does this not warrant a single question by debate moderators?

Monumental journalistic malpractice is the only answer.

NEW ISIS VIDEO of English-speaking CHILD BEHEADING hostage and threatening AMERICA


Do they think Obama will respond? Obama lets Americans die — Benghazi, San Bernardino, Garland, Chattanooga ….

Right now, Obama and ISIS are debating who is the apostate and the true Muslim. Unbelievable.

“ISIS release chilling video of English-speaking child beheading hostage and threatening America,” The Mirror, February 4, 2016:

The child, who is thought to be around 14-years-old, calls on Western fights to meet him

A chilling ISIS video has emerged showing an English-speaking child beheading a hostage.

The gruesome video, filmed in the vile terror group’s slick style, was released onto the internet this afternoon and includes the child issuing a threat to the United States.

The horrifying execution comes at the end of the near 17 minute-long video, soon to be published here – which earlier includes an interview with the condemned man.

It begins with a child, with his young face in full view, leading a man in an orange jumpsuit through a wooded area.

He comes to a stop and has his hostage kneel in front of him.

ISIS boy pictured speaking English and killing rebel in orange jumpsuit


Gruesome: The victim is led to his death by the boy

The camera then stops on a razor sharp knife the child is holding by his side.

Read more: Distraught grandad of ISIS ‘Jihadi Junior’ says innocent youngster being used as propaganda by terror group

As Arabic music plays in the background, the child, who appears to be no more than 14-years-old, then speaks directly to the camera.

He says: “Oh America, these are the soldiers you armed and you spent money on to fight the Sharia of Allah.”

He later adds: “I wish to meet you on the hills of Dabiq”.

Although the child is speaking in English, it is not clear if he is British.

Have your say in the comments section below

The horrifying video concludes with the child taking a deep breath before pushing the kneeling man to the floor, standing over him and then cutting his head off.

As in other horrifying ISIS videos, the victim’s decapitated head is placed on his back as the camera pans away.

It is not the first time a juvenile has been used by the vile terror group.

ISIS boy pictured speaking English and killing rebel in orange jumpsuit


Weapon: The camera stops on the boy’s knife – which he later uses to murder the man

Footage released in early January shows a masked Briton carrying out the brutal murder of five men he accuses of spying for the UK.

The horror clip ends with a child from the UK hailing the deaths, saying: “We will kill the Kuffar (unbelievers) over there.”

The grandad of the English child seen vowing to kill Westerners on the earlier IS murder video has blasted the boy’s mum for letting him take part in the sick stunt.

Sunday Dare begged daughter Grace, who changed her name to Khadijah after converting to Islam and fleeing to Syria in 2012, to bring the youngster home from the war-torn country.

And he insisted the boy, called Isa and believed to be around five years old, is unhappy living with the IS thugs.

Sunday, who also uses the name Henry, said he recognised the lad the moment he saw him at the end of a video in which British IS terror suspect Siddhartha Dhar, dubbed Jihadi John II, ordered the execution of five men accused of being British spies.

Little Isa declares: “We will kill kuffar (non-believers).”

Sunday said: “It’s ­propaganda. They are just using a small boy. He doesn’t know anything, he’s a small boy. They are just using him as a shield.

ISIS boy pictured speaking English and killing rebel in orange jumpsuit


Threat: The boy, thought to be around 10-years-old, speaks directly to America

“It’s my grandson. I can’t disown him. I know him very well.”

Speaking about 24-year-old Khadijah, who left home in Deptford, South East London with Isa and married a Swedish IS fighter, Sunday said he has spoken to his daughter recently.

But he added: “I keep on ignoring her calls because she has brought shame on to our family and to herself.

“My grandson doesn’t like it over there. I don’t trust her.

“I don’t want to be beheaded if I visit her over there.”

Asked what should happen to ­Khadijah, who has another son called Abdur Rahman said to be four, if she returns, he replied: “Let her face the music first.”

Khadijah’s mum Oyenike refused to comment on the video tonight.

But one neighbour said: “She is ­absolutely shocked by ­everything that has happened with her daughter and completely beside herself with worry.

“No doubt she will be even more concerned if her grandchildren are being put in danger.”

Sunday said his daughter told him she was going to study in Egypt but later rang him from IS controlled Syria.

She had allegedly been ­brainwashed by radicals at an Islamic centre attended by the vile killers of soldier Lee Rigby.

– See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/02/new-isis-video-of-english-speaking-child-beheading-hostage-and-threatening-america.html/#sthash.CiRWXN90.dpuf

Joe Scarborough: Hillary’s E-Mails Are ‘Safe To Talk About’ Now

Published on Feb 1, 2016

It only took the State Department to withhold 22 of Hillary Clinton’s emails for the media to report “about how advanced this investigation is” admitted Joe Scarborough on Monday’s Morning Joe. “Is it safe to talk about it now?” Scarborough recalled, referring to a conversation he had with a network executive.

Scarborough bragged that on Friday morning, before the news broke, they knew something big was coming down the pipe in regards to the FBI investigation of Hillary’s emails. “I mean, a couple people held their breath when we talked about it the other day. Everybody in the government, everybody in the media, everybody that runs anything is talking about how advanced this investigation is and nobody’s telling the American people about it.”


State Department Won’t Acknowledge That Clinton Emails Were Born Classified

Published on Jan 30, 2016

State Department spokesman John Kirby would not acknowledge on Friday a letter from the intelligence community’s inspector general stating that information on Hillary Clinton’s private server was classified at the time it was sent and received. Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge asked whether the State Department disagreed with the intelligence community’s determination that Clinton’s email contained information that was highly-classified when it hit the server. The Clinton campaign has argued that the information was only classified retroactively. “The ICIG’s letter from January 14, we’ve confirmed that it was the finding of the agencies who own the intelligence that they were top secret, even containing SAP information, when they hit the server,” Herridge said, using an acronym for Special-Access Programs, among the most closely-guarded secrets of government. “So this is a settled matter, this is not something that is still being pursued. Do you accept that?”

Kirby would not speak to the letter. “I’m not going to speak specifically to that letter or the ICIG’s findings. You’d have to talk to them about that,” Kirby said. Kirby insisted that the State Department would continue its review to determine if information in Clinton’s emails needed to be classified and redacted. “It is the State Department’s responsibility to make the final adjudication on classification,” Kirby said. Herridge said it was the responsibility of the intelligence agencies who own the information, not the State Department. “No, that’s not correct,” Herridge said. “The agency that owns the information has final say over the classification, not the State Department, and these declarations relate to intelligence that was not State Department intelligence.”

Kirby conceded that the State Department had accepted the intelligence community’s decision to upgrade the information in this case. “We did this at the request of the intelligence community. We’re owning the decision to upgrade it to top secret, to upgrade them to top secret. We’re owning that decision, that’s what I meant by that,” Kirby said.