The TRUTH About Violence in the USA That Al Sharpton and Barack Obama DO NOT Want You To Know

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 6.21.47 PM

BY WARNER TODD HUSTON

The media and liberal activists (I know, one and the same, right?) are pushing the claim that blacks are the victims in America today, but the truth is that blacks commit 25 times more violent assaults than whites do. The real criminal statistics is something that Al Sharpton and Barack Obama really don’t want America to know.

Here are the facts that race pimps like Obama, Sharpton and Jesse Jackson don’t want you to know…

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 6.24.00 PM

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 6.24.46 PM

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 6.25.56 PM

The truth is far, far different than the media and the left are telling you!

Why is the FBI Sending Agents Door-to-Door to Ask Coloradoans About Jade Helm?

BY WARNER TODD HUSTON

Why is the FBI going around door-to-door asking people about the military’s Jade Helm exercises? That is what Colorado resident James Casale wants to know.

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 6.06.15 PM

If you are unaware of the US government’s Jade Helm exercise, it has alarmed citizens throughout the south west.

The exercise is supposed to be a training exercise for members of various “elite branches” of the US military, but many feel it is really a way to train the military to attack our own citizens.

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 6.07.10 PM

Now comes the FBI likely looking to infidels to arrest…

Casale was startled by the whole thing. Here is what he wrote as a little background on the day he made the video recording.

Three minutes before they knocked. I totally thought my brother was knocking and messing with me. When I got to the door I seen their badges. They said, “Just here as a knock and talk about a concerning phone call.” So I used my dog as an excuse to grab my cell phone and pray for wisdom, insight, and courage. So I can’t take the credit for staying calm. I did call my state officials in Nebraska to see if they had gotten anything asking for my states participation. Never called the FBI or any Fed’s for that matter.

Now, notice in the video that the FBI agents (if that is what they really are) weren’t taking any notes. That means that they weren’t really investigating anything about Jade Helm and were really snooping into Mr. Casale with the possible intent of arresting him if they could justify it.

After all, the FBI IS THE GOVERNMENT and if they needed to know anything about Jade Helm they could just ask their bosses!

So, what do you think? Is Jade Helm something to worry about?

Majority of Democrats–and an Increasing Percentage of Republicans–Support Sharia Criminalizing Free Speech

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 5.44.50 PM

This is the fight. This is where we make our stand.

The Democrats are the party of treason. So this is expected, but the Republicans must be taken to the woodshed on this.

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 5.46.59 PM

“THE HORROR: Majority of Democrats–and an Increasing Percentage of Republicans–Support Criminalizing Free Speech,” By Pundit, May 22, 2015 

John Sexton reports: A new poll shows that a majority of Democrats want to limit free speech with laws that would prohibit so-called “hate speech.”

The YouGov poll published Wednesday found that 51 percent of Democrats favor imposing legal limits on free speech while just 26 percent of Democrats oppose the idea…(more)

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 5.48.21 PM

A clear example of this desire to limit speech can be found in the New York Times editorial

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 5.50.21 PM

board’s reaction to the attack in Garland. In a piece titled, “Free Speech vs. Hate Speech,” the Times criticizes Pam Geller, the organizer of the cartoon contest and the intended victim of the attack. Speaking of Geller, the Times wrote, “she achieved her provocative goal in Garland — the event was attacked by two Muslims.” 

The Times goes on to argue that no amount of violence—not the Charlie Hebdo attacks, not the theatrical brutality of ISIS, not even 9/11—can justify “provocations” (i.e. cartoons) of Islam. This is the severely limited view of the 1st amendment the left-leaning NYT has already embraced. 

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 5.51.51 PM

In contrast, the opposing view, held by most Republicans and independents according to this YouGov poll, is probably best exemplified by a piece Eugene Volokh published at the Washington Post: 

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 5.53.18 PM

I keep hearing about a supposed “hate speech” exception to the First Amendment, or statements such as, “This isn’t free speech, it’s hate speech,” or “When does free speech stop

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 5.54.36 PM

and hate speech begin?” But there is no hate speech exception to the First Amendment. Hateful ideas (whatever exactly that might mean) are just as protected under the First Amendment as other ideas. One is as free to condemn Islam — or Muslims, or Jews, or blacks, or whites, or illegal aliens, or native-born citizens — as one is to condemn capitalism or Socialism or Democrats or Republicans….(read more at Washington Post) – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/05/majority-of-democrats-and-an-increasing-percentage-of-republicans-support-sharia-criminalizing-free-speech.html/#sthash.v0JIr5P2.dpuf

AP: Hillary Clinton Received Now-Classified Benghazi Info on Private Email Server, Documents Show

Screen Shot 2015-05-22 at 5.38.57 PM

BY LISA LERER AND MATTHEW LEE, ASSOCIATED PRESS

 

WASHINGTON (AP)   – Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton received information on her private email server that has now been classified about the deadly attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi.

The email in question, forwarded to Clinton by her deputy chief of staff Jake Sullivan, relates to reports of arrests in Libya of possible suspects in the attack.

The information was not classified at the time the email was sent but was upgraded from “unclassified” to “secret” on Friday at the request of the FBI, according to State Department officials. They said 23 words of the Nov. 18, 2012, message were redacted from the day’s release of 296 emails totaling 896 pages to protect information that could damage foreign relations.

Because the information was not classified at the time the email was sent, no laws were violated, but Friday’s redaction shows that Clinton received sensitive information on her unsecured personal server.

No other redactions were made to the collection of Benghazi-related emails for classification reasons, the officials said. They added that the Justice Department had not raised classification concerns about the now-redacted 1 1/2 lines when the documents were turned over to the special House committee looking into the Benghazi attack in February. The committee retains a complete copy of the email, the officials said.

It is at the end of a chain of communication that originated with Bill Roebuck, the then-director of the Office of Maghreb Affairs, that pointed out that Libyan police had arrested several people who might have connections to the attack. The redacted portion appears to relate to who provided the information about the alleged suspects to the Libyans. A total of five lines related to the source of the information were affected, but only the 23 words were deleted because the FBI deemed them to be classified.