Finnish politician suggests sterilizing African immigrants ‘to avoid total collapse’ in Helsinki *(ABOUT TIME SOMEBODY SAID SOMETHING)*

Screen Shot 2015-05-28 at 5.46.04 PM

A City of Helsinki deputy councilor has come under fire after he publicly stated in a Facebook post that African men who come to Finland as refugees should not be allowed to have more than three children, and should be sterilized instead.

According to Olli Sademies, 67, the problem with African immigrants is that they have too many children. So forced sterilization is the way to tackle it, he suggested.

“Migrants put to the test our social security,” Sademies wrote. “Africa’s social security is based on a large number of children, which enables some children to live longer and take care of their parents.”

In order “to avoid total collapse” of a similar system in Finland, African refugees should be restricted, Sademies said. “Three children maximum. It would require the forced sterilization of African men, which will effectively discourage them from trundling into our country,” he wrapped up.

Screen Shot 2015-05-28 at 5.47.59 PM

The Finns Party that Sademies is a member of has rushed to distance itself from the controversial statement.

Party Secretary Riikka Sjunga-Poutsalo said on Twitter that Sademies’s comments are only his own views, not those of the party.

Seppo Kanerva, who leads the group of Finns Party councilors on the Helsinki council, slammed Sademies’ remarks.

“What he’s written is completely mad,” Kanerva told Yle’s Swedish language news service, according to Yle in English. “It’s fascism. Hitler thought in the same way. I don’t understand why he wrote that.”

The politician told Helsingin Sanomat daily he stands behind his words.

“This is a way to tackle the problem, and I wait for better suggestions. Tell us what would be better!” he told the HS.

In 2012, a Finns Party parliamentary assistant Helena Eronen raised eyebrows when she suggested on her blog on the Uusi Suomi website to make it compulsory for immigrants to wear armbands.

“If every foreigner was obliged to wear a mark on their sleeve stating their country of origin, then the police could see at a glance that ‘aha, there’s a Muslim from Somalia’, or ‘aha, that’s a beggar from Romania,'” Eronen wrote, as cited by the Helsinki Times.

Read more

Phew – what a racist! Media watchdog slammed after exonerating Katie Hopkins’ migrant slurs

Earlier this month, over 300,000 people signed an online petition calling for the Sun to sack columnist Katie Hopkins, who described African migrants as “cockroaches.” The article, published just five days after 400 people died when a migrant boat capsized in the Mediterranean Sea last month, provoked public outrage.

“NO, I don’t care. Show me pictures of coffins, show me bodies floating in water, play violins and show me skinny people looking sad,” she wrote. “Make no mistake, these migrants are like cockroaches. They might look a bit ‘Bob Geldof’s Ethiopia circa 1984,’ but they are built to survive a nuclear bomb. They are survivors.”

The UN’s human rights chief, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, commented that UK tabloids like the Murdoch-owned Sun that published Hopkins’ comments, bring back the dark days of the Nazi media.

“The Nazi media described people their masters wanted to eliminate as rats and cockroaches,” the UN high commissioner for human rights, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein said in April.

Petition calls for ‘right of return’ for white South Africans to Europe


Threatened by ‘ethnic cleansing and persecutions’ from government

    The petition states South Africans of European descent are facing “ethnic cleansing and persecution” from the South African government.

    The petition was started one week ago by a Brazilian man, Rodrigo Herhaus de Campos, who states: “Over 4,000 white farmers have been brutally murdered, often including torture and rape and mutilation. Many white South Africans today live in poverty and squalor as a consequence of the ANC government’s Black Economic Empowerment policy which shuts whites out of the labor pool.”

    Citing the “Israeli government’s policy of allowing all Jews the right to return to Israel,” the petition says, “[I]t is not only advisable but morally obligatory that Europe should allow all white South Africans the right to return.”

    The petition also calls for extending the same rights to whites living in Zimbabwe and Namibia.

    But the move has caused controversy in both Europe and South Africa.

    On May 23, the U.K. Express published a story with the headline, “Europe could be overrun with white South Africans who ‘have the right to return.’” A few days later, the story’s headline was changed to “White South Africans ‘fearing for their lives’ ask EU for right to ‘return.’”

    In South Africa, a small political party, the Front Nasionaal Suid Afrika, has been designated the “liaison” for the effort. But other South Africans are outraged and strongly opposed to the petition.

    Angel Jones, founder and CEO of the corporate headhunting firm Homecoming Revolution, described her reaction as “fury” in an appearance on the South African Broadcasting Corporation. And the South African website IOL, which represents a group of South African newspapers online, dismissed Herhaus de Campos’ statistics about farm murders as “dubious.”

    But some experts argue whites in South Africa are specifically targeted for violence. Commentator Ilana Mercer, who was born in South Africa and lived for some years in the country, believes the torture and mutilation of white murder victims shows evidence of racial hatred.

    Mercer, a WND columnist and author of “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa,” told WND: “The figures I’ve looked at show that in proportion to their percentage in the population, whites are likelier than blacks to be targeted. Now this differential could be chalked down to the fact that whites are likelier to be wealthier. Nothing, however, explains the manner of death reserved for these victims.

    “When attacked, whites, especially farmers and rural folk, are slaughtered in ways that would do Shaka Zulu proud; in ways that beggar belief. The telltale of racial hatred is seared into the mangled, mutilated bodies of over four thousand dead Afrikaner farmers and their families.”

    Journalist Alex Newman, author of the recent book “Crimes of the Educators: How Utopians Are Using Government Schools to Destroy America’s Children,” has written about South Africa for years and warns white South Africans face nothing less than genocide at the hands of an increasingly far-left government.

    Newsman, who lived in South Africa from 2004 to 2005, explained to WND: “While tragic that European-descent South Africans are in this situation, it is the reality, and the world must act. Radical South African President Jacob Zuma publicly sings songs advocating the extermination of whites in the only homeland they know. They are being openly dehumanized and slaughtered as the regime does nothing, or worse, encourages it.

    “The Communist Party-African National Congress (ANC) regime is going off the rails, and the world’s leading expert on genocide, Dr. Gregory Stanton, has already sounded the alarm bell about the planned extermination of South Africans of European ancestry.”

    Ilana Mercer’s “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa” is a polemical work anchored in history, reality, fact and the political philosophy of classical liberalism.

    Both Newman and Mercer charge Western leaders with hypocrisy when it comes to immigration.

    Mercer observes, “Over the objections of Europeans, unelected Eurocrats are planning to accept at least a million uneducated, poor, possibly illiterate, predominantly male, and by necessity violence-prone north-Africans, sailing from Libyan ports to southern Italy – but imperiled white South Africans claiming refugee status are regularly returned to South Africa.”

    Newman declares, “If Europe and the United States can take in tens of millions of refugees and immigrants from the Middle East, North Africa, Latin America, and every other place where there is trouble, they can certainly find space for a few million upstanding South Africans fleeing for their lives.”

    As Mercer notes, South Africa was once a haven for political dissidents, notably “for Jews like my grandfather who fled the Bolsheviks to build a life in South Africa.” Citing Polish and Czech refugees who “found a haven in South Africa when they fled Communism’s depredations,” Mercer asks, “Where’s the reciprocity?”

    Mercer warns whites in South Africa face a “slow-motion Zimbabwe” if they do not flee the country.

    “Zimbabwe is likely a harbinger of things to come. It’s instructive to understand that South Africa’s strongmen and their poor black constituents salute Robert Mugabe for giving greedy whites ‘a long-delayed and just come-uppance.’ When Mugabe took power in 1980, there were about 300,000 whites in Zimbabwe. Pursuant to the purges conducted by the leader and his people, fewer than 20,000 whites remain and of these, only 200 are farmers.”

    Mercer also claims whites face no economic future in South Africa, telling WND: “Although most farmland in South Africa is still owned by whites, the ANC government is working to change the landowner’s landscape. An extremely radical form of affirmative actions, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), means that racist labor laws make it hard for able white men to make a living.”

    Newman said, “South Africans of all races should be able to live in peace and freedom without persecution, racist laws barring them from the economy, and the grotesque farm murders that have become a fact of life for so many South Africans.”

    But absent those South African reforms, Newman says, “The West has a duty to allow these hard-working, Western-minded, Christian refugees to find a new place to call home, because these beleaguered people have gone through enough.”

    Mercer says America could use many of the white South African refugees, and explains: “As I describe in ‘Into the Cannibal’s Pot,’ there are no better farmers than the hardy Boers, currently operating under the most precarious conditions. Despite a life of graft and grief, most persist and persevere. These are just the kind of men and women whom America, once a frontier nation, needs.”

    But she also says Americans need to pay attention to South Africa for more ominous reasons.

    “The situation in South Africa is coming to a theater near you. In South Africa, white taxpayers constitute a minority with no say in government. South Africa is a dominant-party state.

    “And because of centrally planned, mass immigration from the Third World – the mass importation of undocumented Democrats – the U.S. is on the verge of becoming a dominant-party state, where a disenfranchised minority supports the majority.”

    Mercer also warns black violence against whites is already a reality in the United States.

    If white South Africans, particularly Afrikaners, are not able to leave South Africa, Newman says one alternative is for “the Afrikaner nation to exercise its inherent right of self-determination.”

    In a Feb. 7 article for National Review Online, Josh Gelernter suggested a similar solution, calling for “endangered South Africans” to “set up a Singapore-style city state.”

    If Afrikaners and white South Africans generally are not given a safe haven either in Africa or in the West, warns Newman, “a tragedy of monumental proportions is just around the corner.”

    Summarizing the precarious position of South African whites, Newman said, “I just hope the world will open its eyes before it is too late.”



Screen Shot 2015-05-28 at 10.49.21 AM


Reports from Iraq indicate the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) burned an 80-year-old woman to death after she failed to obey Sharia law.

The vicious act occurred in a town just 12 miles south of Mosul. Sa’ed Mamuzini with the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) told the media the Christian woman hailed “from Kremlis in the Nimrud area of the Hamdaneya sub district, east of Mosul.”

The news comes only a day after ISIS allegedly burned a 20-year-old woman alive “because she refused to perform an extreme sex act.” Zainab Bangura, the United Nation’s representative for sexual crimes in war, interviewed people displaced by ISIS.

“They commit rape, sexual slavery, forced prostitution and other acts of extreme brutality,” Bangura asserted. “We heard one case of a 20-year-old girl who was burned alive because she refused to perform an extreme sex act. We learned of many other sadistic sexual acts. We struggled to understand the mentality of people who commit such crimes.”

ISIS stormed into Iraq and Syria in 2014, leveling historical monuments and kidnapping females as it establishes its caliphate. Yazidi populations have suffered the most under the hands of ISIS terrorists, who interpret the Yazidi worship of the Peacock Angel as “devil worship.”

“After attacking a village, [the Islamic State] splits women from men and executes boys and men aged 14 and over,” she explained. “The women and mothers are separated; girls are stripped naked, tested for virginity and examined for breast size and prettiness. The youngest, and those considered the prettiest virgins fetch higher prices and are sent to Raqqa, the IS stronghold.”

In early May, Bangura spoke to journalists about her previous interviews with women ISIS forced into sex slavery. These women told her about the slave markets and females undergoing surgery to restore their virginity.

“Girls are literally being stripped naked and examined in slave bazaars,” she claimed, and said they were “categorized and shipped naked off to Dohuk or Mosul or other locations to be distributed among ISIL leadership and fighters.”

North Korean Experts Visit Iran’s Nuclear Sites

Screen Shot 2015-05-28 at 10.39.45 AM

A team of North Korean nuclear and ballistic missile experts visited a military site near Tehran in April amid talks between world powers and Iran over its nuclear program, media reported Thursday, citing an exiled Iranian opposition group.

Citing information from sources inside Iran, including within Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps, the Paris-based National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) said the seven person North Korean Defense Ministry team was in Iran during the last week of April.

It was the third time since January that North Koreans had travelled to Iran, and a nine person delegation was due to return in June.

There have previously been unconfirmed reports of ties between the two countries on ballistic missile cooperation, although nothing specific in the nuclear field.

The IAEA, which for years has been investigating alleged nuclear arms research by Tehran, declined to comment. Iranian officials declined to comment.

North Korean officials were not available for comment.

Several Western officials said they were not aware of a North Korean delegation traveling to Iran recently.

North Korea said earlier this month that it has the ability to miniaturize nuclear weapons, a key step toward building nuclear missiles.

In October 2015 Pyongyang plans to launch a long-range ballistic missile.

Read more:

Ann Coulter: Time to End All Immigration for 10 Years *(THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS SHOULD LEARN SOMETHING FROM ANN)*

Screen Shot 2015-05-27 at 11.30.57 AM

by Warner Todd Huston

Ann Coulter is well known as a firebrand and frequently says things just coarse enough to get news out of it. But this time she has the left in a real tizzy by saying that we should end immigration for at least 10 years. Do you agree?

Ann feels that this country is fast deteriorating because of wave after wave of illegals and legals both who are refusing to become Americans but just think they can bring their failed, anti-American, foreign ideas into this country to tear us down. So, is Ann right? Should we put a halt to immigration for a while to allow those here some chance to assimilate?

“In order to change this country to one more favorable to crazy liberal policies, Democrats passed—and Republicans were hoodwinked into passing—this crazy 1965 immigration law that has changed the country in shocking and dramatic ways,” Coulter says, explaining her book’s premise and referring to legislation—sponsored by the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy—that abolished long-implemented preferences for immigrants from northern and western Europe over Africans, Asians and other third-world natives.

“This has been our law for 50 years now, and I blame the Republicans for idiotically continuing it,” she continues. “The Simpson-Mazzoli Act of 1986 [creating an easier path to citizenship for foreigners who illegally entered and settled in the United States] was a mistake. As for these idiot Tea Partiers or whichever conservatives are idol-worshipping Ronald Reagan, he was great for his time, but it was a different world. I don’t think he’s going down as the greatest president when he signed an amnesty law.”

Coulter—whose own ancestors arrived here from the Netherlands, England, Ireland and Germany starting in the 17th century, she says—argues that teeming hordes of new immigrants, especially from Mexico, vote overwhelmingly Democratic, so current immigration policy is really “an evil-genius plan to change the country. That’s what the Democrats get out of it. Obama never could have been elected in this country but for Teddy Kennedy’s immigration act. Never, never, ever, ever!”

Coulter’s politically quixotic prescription: a 10-year moratorium on all legal immigration; a complete dismantling of the immigration bureaucracy, not only government agencies and sympathetic elected officials but also outside advocacy groups; the erection of an impassable fence along the entire U.S.-Mexican border (in her book, she praises the Communist East Germans for effectively, sometimes lethally, preventing their citizens from breaching the Berlin Wall); and a return to pre-1965 policies that give preference to highly-educated, usually white Europeans.

Well, is this a good idea? Tell us your thoughts in the comments.

ISIS offers fighters free honeymoon, housing bonus, cash to start family

Screen Shot 2015-05-27 at 10.54.37 AM

Islamic State fighters looking to tie the knot are in luck – the militants are offering its members a free honeymoon and $1,500 towards their first home. The extremists are also encouraging jihadists to start families, offering a generous $400 per child.

Speaking to AP via Skype, Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) fighter Abu Bilal al-Homsi talked about the perks he receives from the extremist group.

Homsi is given an allowance for his uniform and clothes, and some household cleaning supplies, as well as a monthly food basket worth $65. In addition, he and his wife each receive a stipend of around $50 each per month.

Read more

ISIS rise provoked by outside interference into Middle East, North Africa – Putin

The group encourages its fighters to have children, offering a bonus of up to $400 per child. Foreign fighters are also given a one-time sum of $500 when they marry, which is aimed at helping them start a family.

There’s an opportunity for even more cash, but it requires marrying someone with desirable skills.

Homsi, 28, told AP that he received a rather large bonus because his new wife is a doctor and speaks four languages.

Praising his city and the IS, Homsi shared the story of his wedding and honeymoon, both of which took place in the IS stronghold of Raqqa.

Though the city may not seem like an obvious place to say ‘I do’, he insists it has everything two lovebirds could possibly want.

After Homsi and his wife were married, the two of them strolled along the Euphrates River, ate grilled meats, and enjoyed ice cream.

It’s not the first time that IS has tried to tempt people into the ‘benefits’ of living in the so-called caliphate.

Read more

Australian woman abandons kids to live with ISIS

Just last week, the extremist group released a ‘tourist guide’ which compared the caliphate to a holiday resort.

In February, the group released a 50-page e-bookoffering would-be jihadists advice on how to reach Syria to join the group.

But in its frenzy to paint the caliphate as a desirable place to live, IS glosses over the devastating atrocities it continues to commit.

It was reported this week that the group is committing sex crimes against girls.

“They are institutionalizing sexual violence…the brutalization of women and girls is central to their ideology,” Zainab Bangura, UN special representative on sexual violence in conflict, told the Middle East Eye, as quoted by the Independent.

The comments came after Bangura toured refugee camps, listening to victims’ firsthand accounts of what life is really like in IS-controlled territories.