*( HUMA ABEDIN, HILLARY’S BEST GIRLFRIEND)* Huma Abedin’s DEEP Brotherhood Infiltration Intersects Hill’s “Disappearing” Emails:Follow The “Arab Spring” Jihad…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

https://youtu.be/BqO0b_VcQ_Q

Screen Shot 2015-04-01 at 11.00.10 AM

(Huma Abedin’s Mother, Saleha, a high up Muslim Sisterhood leader, stands to the right – via the computer screen – of Hillary Clinton as Hill gives her autograph to students at Dar al-Hekma college for women in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia)

AT the inception of this site (June 2012) a few “notables” were featured, and it was not for nothing. In fact, as such, Huma(la) Abedin and Hill were front and center right out of the gate. The following commentary (June 25, 2012) was written:

While attending a conference in 2007 at Columbia University (aka Bir-Zeit University) under the auspices of SPME (Scholars For Peace In The Middle East), this American-Israeli engaged in a most interesting discussion with a highly connected individual, who shall remain nameless.

NOW that Egypt has elected its first Muslim Brotherhood President the above discussion comes full circle and bears telling. The person referred to was (and still is) highly intertwined with NYC Democratic political figures (don’t be so shocked…have friends/contacts from the other side!), and often revealed tidbits which would seem shocking on the face of it, but one way or another proved to be true. There was no reason to believe that this time would be different.

IN no uncertain terms it was made known: Hillary Clinton is deeply involved with her Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin. Draw your own conclusions, as to what is meant by “deeply”. The discussion centered around the possibility of another Clinton Presidency, at the time a very real possibility. In any case, the individual was asking me if going public was in the best interests of the United States, in light of Abedin’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood ! You read this right. At first blush the thought was that there was a lack of communication between us, but then decided to ask the individual to repeat said charge. Nothing changed…

IN this regard, fast forward to 2015 via the explosive news that “Madame” Hill wiped her computer clean of “private” emails. Okay, we get that. But in order to understand the core reason why it is imperative to dig to the bottom of this grave breach of ethics (and possible criminality), first and foremost, we must expose Huma Abedin’s VERY deep Brotherhood ties. They wend to the tippy top of the Islamist spear. She is a main Brotherhood implant, as well as Hill’s joined-at-the-hip mate. That close.

IN tandem, Hill and Bill are up to their necks in Brotherhood dealings, chiefly via Billy boy’s William J. Clinton Foundation and its financial trail. As a matter of record, a previous high level employee of the Foundation, a major Brotherhood operative, has been arrested (abroad) on terror charges! Yup. 

EMBLEMATIC of said treachery, please segue to enough proofs to choke many horses.

PROOF ONE:

BESIDES, how much more evidence does Congress require to fully “investigate” Huma Abedin? Moreover, the trail leads directly to Hill and Bill too. Enter, the House of Saud!

PROOF TWO:

NOT only that, but what about their linkage to Benghazigate via Al-Qaeda? Now, that’s enough reason to create alternate email accounts, you think? Never ending.

PROOF THREE:

YET, put on your thinking caps and figure out how Hill became “acquainted” with the Brotherhood’s main spiritual adviser, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi!

PROOF FOUR:

BUT there’s more…and this time, HUSSEIN Obama’s half bro’, Malik Obama, is a key player. Deeply connected to the Brotherhood, he also ties into Huma and Hill. What are the chances….

SO it is under this umbrella of Islamist treacheries that Hill and Huma felt compelled to hide their State Dept-driven Brotherhood operations, and much more still awaits to be uncovered. Nation- shaking.

Scandal: The email plot thickens with news that Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff also used a private email account on the Clintons’ server to conduct government business.

Watchdog group Judicial Watch, which doesn’t like being lied to or jerked around any more than the House Benghazi Select Committee does, has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of State seeking all communications, including emails, between Secretary of State Clinton and Huma Abedin with Nagla Mahmoud, wife of ousted Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi between Jan. 21, 2009, and Jan. 21, 2013.

The lawsuit — which also seeks a thorough search of Clinton’s newly discovered private email accounts connected to a home-based server to exclusively conduct government business — comes alongside the issue of subpoenas by the Benghazi Select Committee. Both have long been curious about the scarcity of produced emails with Clinton’s name on them.

Abedin, perhaps best remembered as the wife of disgraced former congressman Anthony Wiener, is a longtime Hillary friend and confidante. She served as Clinton’s deputy chief of staff at the same time she worked as a consultant to the Clinton Foundation and a New York advisory firm tied to the Clintons, one that did business before the government….

REGARDLESS, none of their Brotherhood-tied hullabaloo is “news” on this end, other than the revelation that separate email accounts were found. For heavens sake. Be that as it may, this investigative journalist welcomes the info that other sites are, at the very least, curious about the facts at hand. As mentioned, much of its basis reverts back to this site’s inception! No matter. Better late than never. Welcome to truth-land.

IN any case, as other outlets catch up to speed, let’s not forget that Huma’s “significant” other, ex Rep. Weiner, was a focal point at this site too, and for good (Islamic doctrinal) reason.

STILL, for one to understand the most revealing aspects to her infiltration and penetration, one must fully recognize exactly how Muslims are dealt with when they marry outside the faith to infidels. Not only that, what about an intermarriage with Jews, those their Quran (Koran) deem no better than “apes and pigs?”

Screen Shot 2015-04-01 at 11.04.08 AM

Sura 7:166 – But when even after this they disdainfully persisted in that from which they were forbidden, We said to them, “Become apes—despised and disgraced!” (Maududi)

Sura 2:65 – And you know well the story of those among you who broke Sabbath. We said to them: “Be apes—despised and hated by all.” 66 Thus We made their end a warning to the people of their time and succeeding generation, and an admonition for God-fearing people. (Maududi)

Sura 5:60 – Then say: “Should I inform you [People of the Book] of those, who will have even worse recompense from Allah than the transgressors? They are those whom Allah has cursed; who have been under His wrath; some of whom were turned into apes and swine; who worshipped taghut [the devil or idols]; those are the people who are in a far worse plight and who have turned farthest away from the Right Way.” (Maududi)….etc….

EVEN so, FOX recently reported the following, but let’s not put all our eggs in the Senate basket, as they tend to blow a lot of hot air.

Senate Republicans are renewing efforts to learn why Huma Abedin, a top assistant to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was allowed to keep working at the agency under a special, part-time status while also being employed at a politically-connected consulting firm.

The new requests are being made by Iowa GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, following revelations that both women used a private Internet server and email accounts for State Department correspondence.

Grassley says the earlier requests to the department have been largely ignored, so the new ones have gone to the department’s inspector general and to Secretary of State John Kerry, seeking their involvement.

HEY, Senate blowhards and schmucks: if you really want to ferret out the truth, don’t waste too much time on the minutia re her “status” at State, and said conflict of interest. Get to the meat…

YES, proofs do exist outside this site, some of which can be found below:

At what point does the compromising of the State Department by the likes of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s closest adviser Huma Abedin (who was conveniently on some sort of questionable hiatus at the time) and Rashad Hussain contribute to the attacks?

A culture at the State Department had been created whereby a diplomatic post in Benghazi was left completely unprotected, had a Muslim Brotherhood militia providing security, and had Ansar al-Sharia for next door neighbors. Yet, no one in Congress or the media is sounding alarm bells over Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the State Department?!

Aren’t some truths self-evident enough to draw logical conclusions?

There is a reason why both Abedin and Hussain should have been disqualified from consideration for jobs with the State Department (Hussain should have been fired in 2010 when he had to admit that he lied about comments he made at a MSA event in 2004). There connections to Muslim Brotherhood groups risked compromise and conflicts of interest….

MOST significantly, when 8 billion dollars worth of State Dept. monies is unaccounted for, and when Egypt’s gov’t accuses HUSSEIN Obama and Hill of a direct nexus to the Brotherhood, well, what else is there to say?

Both President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have found themselves formally charged as accessories to terrorism. Tied to the group of “moderate” Muslims belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood, the Egyptian government is accusing Obama and Clinton of aiding and embedding the terrorists – specifically, their slaughter of innocents.

RESULTANT to all of the above, the question isn’t: why did Hill and Huma keep (heretofore) hidden email accounts to conduct “personal” and official business? Rather, the core query is: how could Congress have ignored all the signals and warnings, particularly, after ex Rep. Michelle Bachmann brought forward a full-on list of evidence which proved that Huma Abedin’s attendant Brotherhood tie-ins present a clear and present danger?

READERS, if so inclined, press your reps very hard for related answers. The truth shall set America free of the Brotherhood’s death grip!

New questions about Huma Abedin’s “special” status

Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 3.13.20 PM

Senate Republicans are renewing efforts to learn why Huma Abedin, a top assistant to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was allowed to keep working at the agency under a special, part-time status while also being employed at a politically-connected consulting firm.

The new requests are being made by Iowa GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, following revelations that both women used a private Internet server and email accounts for State Department correspondence.

Grassley says the earlier requests to the department have been largely ignored, so the new ones have gone to the department’s inspector general and to Secretary of State John Kerry, seeking their involvement.

Grassley’s probe started in 2013, when he requested all communications between Abedin, after she switched from a full-time deputy chief of staff for Clinton to a part-timer, then started working for Teneo, a consulting firm that says it “brings together the disciplines of government and public affairs.”

 FULL REPORT HERE:

Senate GOP asking new questions about emails for Clinton and Abedin, who had special employment status | Fox News.

Senate GOP asking new questions about emails for Clinton and Abedin, who had special employment status

Senate Republicans are renewing efforts to learn why Huma Abedin, a top assistant to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was allowed to keep working at the agency under a special, part-time status while also being employed at a politically-connected consulting firm.

The new requests are being made by Iowa GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, following revelations that both women used a private Internet server and email accounts for State Department correspondence.

Grassley says the earlier requests to the department have been largely ignored, so the new ones have gone to the department’s inspector general and to Secretary of State John Kerry, seeking their involvement.

Grassley’s probe started in 2013, when he requested all communications between Abedin, after she switched from a full-time deputy chief of staff for Clinton to a part-timer, then started working for Teneo, a consulting firm that says it “brings together the disciplines of government and public affairs.”

A July 2013 letter from the department to Grassley, provide by the senator’s office, states Abedin worked full-time from January 2009 to June 2012. It also states Abedin did not list outside employment upon ending her full-time employment and that the department retained her as an adviser-expert at the hourly rate of a SGA GS-15/10.

The most recent available federal documents show the rate as $74.51 with a maximum pay of $155,500 annually.

“A number of conflict-of-interest concerns arise when a government employee is simultaneously being paid by a private company, especially when that company (is) Teneo,” Grassley said in the March 19 letter to Kerry that also raised concerns about Abedin and other department employees appearing to have been “improperly categorized” as special government employees, or SGEs.

Grassley says he specifically wants to know “what steps the department took to ensure that … Abedin’s outside employment with a political-intelligence and corporate-advisory firm did not conflict with her simultaneous employment at the State Department.”

The letter to department Inspector General Steve Linick also questions whether the department’s “excessive” use of SGE designations undermines ethics standards and if Clinton and Abedin’s private emails have the potential to impede the department from fulfilling Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, requests, over which the upper chamber’s Judiciary Committee has legislative jurisdiction.

Grassley says the department’s answers have so far been “largely unresponsive” and points to a November 2014 response that in part states “an individual may receive an SGE designation if he or she is joining the department from the private sector or is coming from another government position.”

However, Abedin came neither from the private sector nor another government position, Grassley argues.

“She converted from a full-time employee … with seemingly little difference in her job description or responsibilities,” he wrote.

Grassley also argues that the purpose of the SGE program is to help the government get temporary services from people with special knowledge and skills whose principal employment is outside the government.

However, Abedin essentially kept the same job and was subsequently hired by Teneo and the Clinton Global Initiative.

“It is unclear what special knowledge or skills Ms. Abedin possessed that the government could not have easily obtained otherwise from regular government employees,” Grassley wrote.

The State Department says Abedin was an SGE until February 2013, essentially doing the same job that she did as a full-time employee, advising on Clinton’s schedule and travel. It also states she reviewed department ethics guidelines but was allows to work part-time without a new security clearance.

Grassley also says the department’s current use of the SGE designation “blurs the line between public and private sector employees” and that department employees getting full-time salaries for what appears to be part-time work is “especially troubling.”

“The taxpayer deserves to know,” Grassley wrote.

HILLARY CLINTON WIPED EMAIL SERVER CLEAN, REFUSES TO TURN IT OVER *(AND BECAUSE THOSE WHO RUN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY ARE SO STUPID, HILLARY WILL BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT.)*

Screen Shot 2015-03-28 at 5.05.53 PM

Clinton has refused to turn her email server over to an independent third party and claims she has wiped the server clean

By Stephen Dinan – The Washington Times 

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has refused to turn her email server over to an independent third party and claims she has wiped the server clean, dealing a setback to the special investigative committee looking into the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack, the probe said late Friday.

Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy said the whole House will have to decide what the next steps are in the push to pry information from Mrs. Clinton, but said she will likely have to appear and testify on her decision-making about her emails, setting up another dramatic showdown between the former first lady and her congressional critics.

“Not only was the secretary the sole arbiter of what was a public record, she also summarily decided to delete all emails from her server ensuring no one could check behind her analysis in the public interest,” Mr. Gowdy said in a statement excoriating Mrs. Clinton’s actions.

Mr. Gowdy said Mrs. Clinton’s response to his subpoena was to re-transmit several hundred pages of emails that the State Department has already turned over.

Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, the top Democrat on the Benghazi probe, said that proves Mrs. Clinton has already produced all of her official records concerning the terrorist attack.

“It is time for the committee to stop this political charade and instead make these documents public and schedule Secretary Clinton’s public testimony now,” he said.

Mrs. Clinton said at a press conference earlier this month that she culled through more than 60,000 emails from her time as secretary and decided about 30,000 of them were public records that should have been maintained. She said the rest were private messages relating to her daughter’s wedding or her yoga class schedule, and she didn’t keep those.

But Mr. Gowdy said Mrs. Clinton’s lawyers informed him Friday that she “unilaterally decided to wipe her server clean and permanently delete all emails” from it.

He said it wasn’t clear when Mrs. Clinton made the final decision, but he said it appeared to have happened after the State Department asked her to turn over her government business messages in late October.

Mrs. Clinton rejected use of a government-issued email account during her four years as secretary, first relying on an account she used while a senator and then later setting up an email server at her home in New York and using an account on that to conduct all of her business, both public and private.

She insists she followed the law, which at the time didn’t require officials to use government-issued accounts but did require them to turn over all official records to be stored. Mrs. Clinton didn’t turn over those records until last December, after the Benghazi probe noticed she had used a private email and requested those records from the State Department, which then asked Mrs. Clinton for them. The law doesn’t set a date for turning over records.

Open-records experts, however, question Mrs. Clinton’s designation of her server as private, saying it was set up in order to do government business, and so it and the emails on it arguably belong to the government.

Mrs. Clinton’s email practices have put the Obama administration in a difficult position. Obama lawyers have admitted in federal court that for years, they were not correctly performing open-records searches because they didn’t have her emails, but they say they are unilaterally going back and doing those searches now.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/27/hillary-clinton-wiped-email-server-clean-refuses-t/#ixzz3Vil691ku

Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

BREAKING: DHS Official Gave Special Favors To Hillary Clinton’s Brother

Capture

CHUCK ROSS
Reporter
Alejandro Mayorkas, the former director of U.S. Customs and Immigration Services, favored projects championed by Nevada U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, and Hillary Clinton’s brother Tony Rodham, according to an explosive new report from the Department of Homeland Security inspector’s general (IG).

The IG concluded its investigation into whether Mayorkas, now the deputy secretary at DHS, “exerted improper influence” in the adjudication of the Employee-Based Fifth Preference (EB-5), which allows aliens to invest $500,000 in U.S. companies in order to gain residency for themselves and their families.

And indeed, the IG determined that Mayorkas did improperly exert his influence, and on behalf of companies with ties to Reid, McAuliffe, and Rodham.

“Mayorkas communicated with stakeholders on substantive issues, outside of the normal adjudicatory process, and intervened with the career USCIS staff in ways that benefited the stakeholders,” the report reads, noting that in each of those cases the outcome would have been different if not for Mayorkas’ intervention.

The report also noted that more than 15 USCIS employees at all levels conveyed “the same factual scenario: certain applicants and stakeholders received preferential access to DHS leadership and preferential treatment in either the handling of their application or petition or regarding the merits of the

The IG, which began its investigations in Sept. 2012, also found that the number and variety of witnesses was “highly unusual” and characterized Mayorkas’ level of intervention as “unprecedented.”

In one case, Mayorkas intervened on behalf of GreenTech Automotive, an electric car company controlled by Gulf Coast Funds Management. McAuliffe was chairman of Gulf Coast’s board while Tony Rodham was CEO.

In an unrelated case, Rodham’s position with Gulf Coast earned him a spot on the board of a gold mining company with interests in Haiti. Rodham met the owner of that company, VCS Mining, at an event for the Clinton Global Initiative, his sister’s charity.

The IG report shows that Mayorkas became involved in the Gulf Coast’s application in July 2010. He opposed USCIS employees’ decision to deny the company’s EB-5 visa applications, though staffers felt that the GreenTech project fell outside of the scope of the program and that it was “really not so good of a project.”

But McAuliffe pushed for EB-5 and continuously called and met with Mayorkas on the matter. According to the IG report, after Gulf Coast’s application was initially denied, Mayorkas took a deep and special interest in the project, telling staff that he would personally oversee it. During one meeting, he shocked staffers by saying that he would take materials related to the application home so that he could work on the case.

Many USCIS staff believed that Mayorkas’ interest in the project indicated that Gulf Coast was “wired in” to the agency.

In early 2013, Mayorkas backed off of his hands-on involvement with the application. But it was understood within the agency that he still hoped to see its application approved. On Jan. 29, 2013, Rodham sent Mayorkas sent an email regarded processing delays. Mayorkas forwarded the email to staff with a “high importance” designation, according to the inspector general.

Gulf Coast’s fourth amendment for application was approved in Feb. 2014.