President Obama and the UN Scheming to Islamize the West!

Screen Shot 2015-10-02 at 12.06.08 PM


In case you think that the recent flood of Muslim invaders into the West is purely Barack Hussein Obama’s idea, then perhaps you may need to dig a little deeper and understand that this is all part of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees’ “Transformative Agenda” via the influence of the Socialist International (SI). This agenda is nothing short of Balkanizing Europe and the united States and making our lands filled with chaos, terrorism, strife and wickedness.

The New American reports:

UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) executive director Anthony Lake are the UN point men working closely with the Obama State Department. The active leadership of both these individuals in the U.S. and EU refugee policies is cause for alarm. Even more alarming is the fact that they are not the only troubling participants; the ranks of the UN officials involved in formulating refugee “solutions” are filled with persons — including from Communist China — who have neither the interests of the refugees nor the security concerns of the West in mind. Guterres is the former Socialist Party prime minister of Portugal and former president of the European Council. Perhaps most notably, he was, from 1999-2005, president of the Socialist International, the radical Marxist organization that includes many “former” communist parties that have rebranded themselves as “socialist” or “social democrat” — without significantly changing their politics or personnel.

Although virtually unknown to most Americans, the Socialist International (SI) has been exerting enormous political influence worldwide since the 1950s, especially through its dominant influence at the United Nations.

SI “ultimate objective … nothing less than world government”

The Socialist International membership includes more than 160 socialist parties from more than 100 countries, including from 54 nations where SI member parties are currently running the show or sharing power in a coalition government. At its 1962 Congress in Oslo, Norway, the Socialist International candidly proclaimed: “The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government…. Membership of the United Nations must be made universal.” The SI has never deviated from that objective, and has used its growing influence to push greater empowerment of the UN and its agencies, to the point that the UN is now on the brink of becoming a world government.

SI called on the European Union to reach a speedy agreement to handle in a “fair and humane” way the flow of refugees and asylum seekers from the Middle East. The organization added, “While it is important to recognise that this is an issue of global dimension and requires that countries from all continents assume their fair share of responsibility, it is crucial for Europe today to act in line with the values, the spirit of solidarity and of common progress upon which the EU was founded with the participation of our movement, and in keeping with its moral and legal obligations.”


Obama-and-refugees-1024x536First, how does SI claim anyone must “assume their fair share and responsibility”? Where did that idea come from? Second, what is this claim of “common progress”? Take a look at the Middle East and take a look at the West. There are light years of difference between the progress of one and the living in the Dark Ages of the other, and that has been the result of choosing to do so. The West has been based upon the Christian faith, teaching victory in Christ over the nations and subduing the enemies of Christ through the Gospel. The Middle East, for the most part, has been subdued by the teachings of Allah. We all see what that has resulted in.

SI continued their appeal to the world, “The Socialist International remains committed to promoting political solutions to this crisis, convinced that political action is the only way to achieve the conditions necessary for peace, democracy and equality. This position has been borne out at the numerous meetings of its Migrations Committee, its regional committees and its Councils, the most recent of which, held at the UN headquarters in New York, adopted unanimously a Charter for the Rights of Migrants, Refugees and Asylum Seekers to which all its member parties worldwide subscribe.”

“At the SI Council meeting held at the UN in Geneva in December 2014 António Guterres, UN High Commissioner for Refugees and former President of the Socialist International, warned that the humanitarian system was reaching breaking point,” SI noted. “He also stressed the crucial need to tackle the root causes that create humanitarian problems, which urgently needed to be addressed from a political perspective.”

Others on the UN’s Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC), who are behind the scenes and have been pushing this agenda include Helen Clark, Dr. Margaret Chan, and Anthony Lake.

The New American points out what these people and the State Department have been up to.

The collaborative relationship between the U.S. State Department and the UNHCR (including IASC, on which Antony Lake, Antonio Guterres, et al serve) is spelled out formally in the State Department document : “2014-2015 Framework for Cooperation Between the United States Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.”

That document begins: “The Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration at the United States Department of State (hereinafter referred to as PRM) and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (hereinafter referred to as UNHCR) have been working in formal partnership through a Framework for Cooperation since the year 2000 to provide protection, humanitarian assistance, and durable solutions to UNHCR’s beneficiaries.”

It continues: “They have a unique relationship: PRM has long been UNHCR’s top donor, while UNHCR has been PRM’s largest multilateral partner. PRM and UNHCR renew their bilateral Framework for Cooperation biennially to advance shared objectives.”

Ultimately, we can assume there is a greater end game than just being good “humanitarians,” and once this is in place and the chaos ensues, the UN will be called on to invade and “keep the peace.” This eventually seeks to be a predecessor to a one world government. If you are like me, you would like to see the complete defunding of the United Nations by the united States and the removal of that organization and all its tentacles from American soil.

Here’s more:

From Freedom Outpost

Politics: 9 simple charts that demonstrate the disaster of Obama’s economic policies

Screen Shot 2015-09-30 at 5.28.07 PM


Recovery? Er, no . . .

Gauging the economic performance of a president is a tricky thing for a lot of reasons, not least of which is the fact that so many statistics sound like apples-to-apples but really aren’t (like the U3 unemployment rate for example, which doesn’t tell you the change in labor force participation), and the fact that politicians cherry-pick statistics that don’t always mean what they want you to think they mean (like “jobs created”).

There is also this: Much of what happens in the economy is not controlled by politicians. That’s a hard one to swallow sometimes because we tend to want to assess presidents on the basis of things like “how he manages the economy” when in fact he does no such thing.

But he does make decisions on economic policies, and there are measurable statistics that can show us not only the results of these policies, but their larger impact on the economy as a whole. That doesn’t mean the president controls everything, but it does show how he can impact things. Over at The Federalist Papers, Jason W. Stevens has put nine such charts together in a wonderful Brady Bunch-style assemblage that really gets to the heart of how horrendous Obama’s decisions have been, and how many problems we now have to solve as a result of them.

It ain’t pretty, but here you go:

Screen Shot 2015-09-30 at 5.32.03 PM

Any way you look at it, Obama’s policies have failed to improve things. If you had to pull out only one of the nine, I’d proably choose the one that shows the decline in median family income. That’s just a stunning indictment of everything Obama claims his policies are supposed to accomplish. But dishonorable mention would have to go to health insurance costs, which are soaring precisely because Obama decided to intervene in a market that was working OK but suffering from too much federal manipulation – only to see Obama introduce even more federal manipulation in the form of unrealistic coverage standards and insane restrictions on insurers’ discretion concerning who gets covered.

By the way, that’s directly retired to the rise in debt. Even with the subsidies, the rising premiums are costing people more, but liberals would have you believe the subsidies make the rising premiums no big deal. Except that the same taxpayers who can’t afford the premiums also can’t afford the higher taxes necessary to fund them, not to mention the additional debt they are causing the nation to incur.

But those are just lowlights. The entire picture demonstrates just what a sharp left turn U.S. economic policy has taken under Obama, and exactly what the result has been. We’re printing and borrowing more money, spending much more, regulating health care more closely – and none of those who are supposed to be benefiting from any of this are seeing that happen.

Kudos to Stevens for putting it together, and to the Heritage Foundation for the accompanying commentary you can see at the link. If you really want a sense of where we stand economically, you can look at thousands of different charts. But if I were you, I’d start with these four.

Watch Hillary Supporters Get Tricked Into Endorsing Trump [VIDEO]


Jimmy Kimmel sent a camera crew out to Los Angeles to find Hillary Clinton supporters and ask them about her tax plan, but what they didn’t know is that they were being asked about Donald Trump’s plan instead, and the late night host tricked them into endorsing Trump.

In the clip, the cameraman asks the Clinton supporters if they agree with her policy to cut corporate taxes and get rid of the alternative minimum tax — all Trump’s ideas — and every person agrees.

Just wait until you see their faces when they find out it’s not hers.

Read more:

14 Things That Would Happen if Illegals Left the Country


[portions by Frosty Wooldridge, others added by an unknown author. Tina Griego, of the Denver Post, however, did not write it, and gets annoyed when people say she did]

What if the illegals left?

Somebody really did their homework on this one. Best on the subject to present date.

What if 20 Million Illegal Aliens Vacated America?

It’s a good question… it deserves an honest answer. Over 80% of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration stopped. But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America? The answers I found may surprise you!

In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico, it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested. Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language again.

In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and grandchilds would move back “home,” mostly to Mexico. That would save Colorado an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually in taxes that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration costs. It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone.

Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.

Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67% dropout/flunk rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from our gridlocked cities in Colorado. Denver’s 4% unem ployment rate would vanish as our working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.

In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State back to America, the rule of law, and English.

In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.

If 20 million illegal aliens returned ‘home,’ the U.S. Economy would return to the rule of law. Employers would hire legal American citizens at a living wage. Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn’t be working off the books. That would result in an additional $401 billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local, state and city coffers.

No more push ‘1’ for Spanish or ‘2’ for English. No more confusion in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids. Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.

We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.

In cities like L.A., 20,000 members of the ’18th Street Gang’ would vanish from our nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans! No more foreign rapists and child molesters!

Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded highways and gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal aliens!

America’s economy is drained. Taxpayers are harmed. Employers get rich. Over $80 billion annually wouldn’t return to the aliens’ home countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America ‘s economy which currently suffers an $8.7 trillion debt. $8.7 trillion debt!!!

At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86 hospitals in California, Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act. Americans wouldn’t suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country – brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders.

Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities. It would also put the ‘progressives’ on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11% of our greenhouse gases.

Over one million of Mexico’s poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville, Texas, to San Diego, California, in what the New York Times called, ‘colonias’ or new neighborhoods. Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without sewage, clean water, streets, roads, electricity, or any kind of sanitation.

The New York Times reported them to be America’s new ‘Third World’ inside our own country. Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonials. (I’ve seen them personally in Texas and Arizona; it’s sickening beyond anything you can imagine.)

By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico. We should invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own countries and/or make a better life in Mexico. We already invite a million people into our country legally annually, more than all other countries combined. We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation.

It’s time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our way of life.

Interesting Statistics!

Here are 14 reasons illegal aliens should vacate America, and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:

1. $14 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare to illegal aliens (that’s Billion with a ‘B’)

3. $7.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal aliens.

4. $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they still cannot speak a word of English!

5. $27 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.

6. $3 Million Dollars ‘PER DAY’ is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. That’s $1.2 Billion a year.

7. 28% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens.

8. $190 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.

9. $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.

10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that’s two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in t he US.

11. During the year 2005, there were 8 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from other terrorist countries. Over 10,000 of those were middle-eastern terrorists. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin, crack, guns, and marijuana crossed into the U.S. from the southern border.

12. The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.

13. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $65 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin, to their families and friends.

14. The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States!

Total cost a whopping $538.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR !

Grover Norquist blesses Trump’s tax plan, brings ‘Jobs, jobs, jobs’



Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s newly released tax plan was given a blessing Monday by the nation’s biggest anti-tax advocate, Grover Norquist, who said it would produce “jobs, jobs, jobs.”

As Trump revealed his plan at a press conference, Norquist’s influential Americans for Tax Reform released its review that Trump’s plan is “consistent” with the advocacy group’s “Taxpayer Protection Pledge.”

ATR said that the Trump plan overall budget neutral, and reforms some of the current tax code.

On Twitter, Norquist wrote: “The @realDonaldTrump tax plan cuts business tax from 35% to 15%. This makes us competitive worldwide. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs.”


But, ATR added that Trump’s plan isn’t perfect. “The most disappointing part of the Trump plan is that the tax system would move no closer to full expensing of business fixed investment. Businesses would still be saddled with the complex, distorting, and growth-inhibiting ‘depreciation’ regime where an asset is deducted over several or even many years,” said the analysis.

Below is ATR’s report just sent out:

ATR Analysis of Donald Trump Tax Reform Plan

By Ryan Ellis, ATR tax policy director GOP Presidential candidate Donald Trump released details of his tax reform plan today. It features a system with much lower tax rates than current law, and a broadened tax base for high income earners.

“Trump’s plan is certainly consistent with the Taxpayer Protection Pledge,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. “Trump has said he opposes net tax hikes and has made clear that the real problem is spending. This plan is a reform, not a tax hike.” The plan is not a tax cut, but is rather intended to be revenue neutral under a dynamic score.

Basic elements of the Trump tax plan include:

Carried interest: The plan “ends the current tax treatment of carried interest for speculative partnerships that do not grow businesses or create jobs and are not risking their own capital.” Partnerships that do not speculate but rather buy hard assets for the long run will not face a tax increase – for example, private equity firms. Private equity firms do not speculate, but rather grow businesses and create jobs. Most importantly, private equity partnerships risk their own capital, namely the capital provided by the pension funds, colleges, and charities which invest in them for long term investment returns. These types of investments are vital for workers with both traditional pensions and 401(k) plans, for the colleges Americans send their children to, and for the charities they support.

The carried interest tax hike in the Trump plan is intended to only apply to the type of funds Trump has always said they would apply to: “hedge fund guys.” Americans for Tax Reform opposes any change to the tax treatment of carried interest — including those on hedge fund guys — but is pleased that the usual target of this left wing ivory tower tax hike proposal — private equity partnerships–is held harmless in the Trump plan. This is not the case, for example, in Governor Jeb Bush’s plan.

As the rest of the GOP field prepares to release their tax plans, they should keep in mind the Left’s long term goal to tax ALL capital gains as ordinary income. That’s why this carried interest tax hike idea originated in the bowels of leftist academia, and is nearly universally supported by the progressive Left — it’s the camel’s nose under the tent toward taxing all capital gains at ordinary rates. Republicans and conservatives should not give aid and comfort to this long term strategy.

ATR has detailed the case against carried interest tax hikes with op-eds in USA Today and Forbes.

Tax rates: Individual tax brackets of 0, 10, 20, and 25 percent (the top rate today is 39.6 percent). The “zero bracket” would apply to married couples’ first $50,000 of income (half that for singles).Capital gains and dividends: By repealing Obamacare’s savings surtax, the capital gains and dividends rate is reduced from 23.8 percent today to 20 percent under the Trump plan.

It’s also important to note that with a top ordinary income tax rate of 25 percent, the carried interest tax rate hike on “hedge fund guys” is fairly modest, rising from 23.8 percent today to 25 percent under the Trump plan. ATR opposes this tax increase.Business tax rate: The tax rate on corporate and non-corporate businesses is 15 percent, down from 35 percent today for corporations and 39.6 percent for pass-through firms.

Death Tax: Repealed.

Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT): Repealed.

Marriage Penalty: Repealed.