When Will the NAACP Truly Help Their People?

Screen Shot 2014-11-11 at 4.26.49 PM

November 11, 2014 By Lloyd Marcus

Upon reading a post election article in which the NAACP is all fired up about supposed black voter suppression, my response was when will these people ever seriously do something to help black people? Folks, I am sorry, but the NAACP and others in their civil rights syndicate are a despicable bunch. All they really care about is furthering Liberalism and increasing their political power. They are disgusting.

In their typical we know we can count on the MSM to help us “play” black voters and portray Republicans as the modern KKK, the NAACP and their race-baiting posse are insisting that the newly elected congress pass a robust Voting Rights Act Amendment.
Yes, heaven knows we black folks desperately need that. Why waste time and resources on fixing trivial things like black on black crime, blacks aborting themselves into extinction, epidemic high school dropouts, black baby daddies outnumbering fathers and record high black unemployment under Obama? Let’s triple down on our efforts to create victim mindsets in blacks and racial hate. That will surely empower and enhance the lives of blacks.

Every time the NAACP and their MSM suck-ups launch another of their deplorable whitey-is-out-to-get-cha narratives such as black voters were disenfranchised during this election, it is shrouded in a we’re-smarter-than-you arrogance. Not only are these vile people feeding us a load of crap, they are superior about it.

Charlie Rangel tried to scare blacks to the polls by saying that the GOP wants to return blacks to slavery in America. This is trash folks. This evil little man is a disgrace.

First Lady Michelle Obama tried to bribe blacks with a reward of fried chicken for their vote. Heck, why didn’t Michelle throw in permission for blacks to indulge in an extra large slice of watermelon for dessert? A white politician making the same offer to blacks as Michelle would be tarred, feathered and run out of DC on a rail. When will black Americans wake up and smell the condescension, manipulation and exploitation coming from the Democrats; fronted by black traitorous operatives.

I could go on and on about black traitors in the Democratic Party screwing their own to please their socialist/progressive liberal massas. But why keep repeating what I have written in countless articles?

Let’s talk about the broken promises, unfulfilled and wasted lives resulting from black leaders selling out their own to the Democrats’ enslaving big government programs for 30 pieces of political silver. Real people. Real lives.

My late cousin Poochie (Lawrence) comes to mind. He was the eldest in my Aunt Bummie’s cradle-to-grave welfare household; five fatherless sons. Poochie was the lone survivor who broke free from the government welfare system. Miraculously, Poochie worked his way through college and achieved great success. His four siblings all died young on welfare; drugs, AIDS, serial out of wedlock impregnating and crime. An idle mind truly is the Devil’s workshop.

Urban blacks are finally beginning to smell the betrayal of so-called black advocates, white liberal socialist/progressives, the Democrats and Obama.

A talent agent once told me that he had seen numerous black kids with Michael Jackson talent living in the projects. According to this agent, kids in the projects were doing the moonwalk before Michael brought it to the national stage. Fatherless households, drugs, teen pregnancies, quitting school and crime prevents many black youths from fulfilling their God given talents, gifts, potential and dreams.

Meanwhile, black Democrat operatives are running around trying to destroy and silence non-whiny successful blacks; laser focused on delivering blacks to the polls every election cycle scared and angry at whites.

Presuming that blacks are clueless idiotic sheep, the best the Democrats are offering blacks is a promise to stop white cops from shooting them at will, preventing the GOP from reinstating black slavery, lighter sentences when they are caught dealing drugs, free Obama phones, food stamps and more crumbs. Oh, and permission to eat fried chicken, if they are really good.

Black retired gifted neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson gained international fame for his groundbreaking work separating conjoined twins. Carson came from humble beginnings raised by a single mom. What if Carson was among the extremely high number of black abortions? Could a brilliant black baby destined to cure cancer have already been aborted?

Why on earth do blacks in the Democratic Party and Obama celebrate, protect, fund and vehemently defend Planned Parenthood who have a disproportionate high number of offices in black communities?

Blacks kill their babies in higher numbers than other races. Why are so-called black leaders so high on abortion? The answer is socialist/progressives entrenched in the Democratic Party believe babies contribute to destroying the planet. Blacks who supp at the socialist/progressive’s table sacrifice black babies for their seats, keeping massa happy.

So, right on NAACP, push forward with you scheme to shame Congress into passing your absurd unnecessary politically calculated Voting Rights Act Amendment.

Meanwhile, black lives are going down the toilet thanks to your failed government programs and refusal to seriously deal with real issues. And may God have mercy on your wretched souls

The Obama Effect: First Time the President’s Home State Governor has Lost Re-Election Since 1892

Screen Shot 2014-11-06 at 10.35.06 AM

By Jennifer Burke

In a stunning rebuke of both Barack and Michelle Obama in Illinois, Republican candidate and businessman, Bruce Rauner, defeated Democrat incumbent Pat Quinn for the governorship. With 99.5% of the districts reporting, Rauner has prevailed winning 50.7% of the vote to Quinn’s 45.9%. This despite the fact that Michelle Obama traveled to Illinois to stump for Quinn on Saturday, November 1.

During her visit to Chicago to campaign on behalf of Quinn, Michelle Obama encouraged voters to get out and vote for Quinn, stating that for her, this race is personal. She shared that she believed Quinn would make the investments necessary in education in order to build a stronger middle class. However, a group of two dozen black ministers from Chicago disagreed on this point with the First Lady.
Rauner’s campaign had received strong backing from and the endorsement of these black pastors who had grown tired of Quinn’s broken promises. Frustrated with continued high unemployment and underperforming schools, these pastors were impressed by Rauner’s personal commitment demonstrated to education. They applauded Rauner for using his personal fortune to improve schools within the black community.

The Chicago Tribune, the major newspaper in Obama’s hometown, also endorsed Rauner. The Tribune said that Rauner could do what Quinn failed to do, which is to make Illinois competitive again.

From the get-go, Rauner has campaigned on the urgent need to shatter the self-serving political power structure in state government and promote a dramatically different agenda to get Illinois growing again. He knows that the answer isn’t more tax increases. Unlike the ruling class in Springfield, he doesn’t see employers as enemies useful only to be milked. He wants government to be of a size taxpayers can afford.

This victory by Rauner is a huge one since, according to NBC’s Chuck Todd, it is the first time the president’s home state (IL) governor lost re-election since 1892.

At his victory celebration, Rauner asked his supporters, “Are you ready for a new direction? Are you ready to bring back Illinois? This election is about bringing back our great state.”

Despite the large margin of victory. Democrat incumbent governor Quinn refuses to concede until, he says, every vote is counted.

In Illinois: Rauner declares victory, Quinn won’t concede

Screen Shot 2014-11-05 at 10.25.14 AM

Screen Shot 2014-11-05 at 10.26.50 AM

By Rick Pearson, Bob Secter, Monique Garcia, Jeff Coen,
Clout Street

Rauner claims victory in governor race, but Quinn not conceding
Rauner tells supporters, “This is your victory”
Gov. Quinn refuses to concede as Rauner claims win
Republican Bruce Rauner claimed victory Tuesday night in the Illinois governor race as voters moved to end a dozen years of one-party Democratic rule following a vicious campaign that set records for political fundraising.

“This is your victory. This is a victory for every family in Illinois,” Rauner told cheering supporters gathered at the Chicago Hilton and Towers.

The Republican said the election was “a historic time in Illinois,” adding that he had placed phone calls to House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton — two Democrats he vilified during the campaign as part of a “corrupt” political system controlling Springfield.

“I said to them this is an opportunity for us to work together, this is an opportunity for us to come together on a bipartisan basis,” Rauner said as some in the crowd booed the mention of the Democratic leaders.

Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn, however, refused to concede in his bid for a second elected term, arguing that there were enough votes yet to be counted to possibly reverse the outcome.

“I don’t believe in throwing in the towel while votes are being counted,” Quinn told supporters. “We will never yield until all the votes are in.”

With 99 percent of the state’s precincts reporting, Rauner had 50 percent of the vote to Quinn’s 46 percent. Libertarian Chad Grimm had 3 percent of the vote.

Vote tallies showed Rauner with about 180,000 more votes than Quinn, but the Democrat was pinning his hopes on delayed counting of early and mail-in votes in the Chicago area as well as provisional votes cast on Monday and Tuesday by newly registered voters whose qualifications still must be vetted by authorities.

A Rauner victory marks a stinging national defeat for President Barack Obama in his home state. The president, along with first lady Michelle Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, raised campaign cash and rallied voters for Quinn.

The voting came after as much as $100 million was spent between the two candidates, much of it on aggressively negative TV attack ads as each sought to portray the other as personally unsuitable to lead the nation’s fifth-largest state.

But in the end, voters opted to give the edge to the untested Rauner, a wealthy equity investor making his first bid for public office, rather than stay with Quinn, who took office in 2009 after the impeachment of the imprisoned Rod Blagojevich.

Perhaps the most immediate consequence of Rauner’s victory is to leave unsettled the fate of the state income tax rate, which is scheduled to drop from 5 percent to 3.75 percent Jan. 1, less than two weeks before the new governor will be sworn in.

Supporters of Republican candidate for governor Bruce Rauner watch election returns that show Rauner leading Quinn at Rauner’s election night celebration at the Chicago Hilton and Towers.
Quinn would have pushed lawmakers to make the higher rate permanent, arguing that any cut would knock a gaping hole in state finances. Rauner has said he wants the rate eventually reduced to 3 percent, but he has been vague about whether he thinks a drop to 3.75 percent is affordable in the near term.

In the run-up to Tuesday’s vote, Rauner said that if elected he would move quickly to try to prevent Quinn and the outgoing legislature from enacting legislation he opposes — potentially including greater protections for unionized workers — before he is sworn into office.

“There’s so much going on, especially in the lame-duck General Assembly. We’re going to go to work and make sure nothing bad happens during the General Assembly,” Rauner said on WGN Radio earlier this week about the return of lawmakers to Springfield on Nov. 19.

The apparent election of Rauner marked the first time Illinois voters chose a Republican for the state’s top job since 1998, when they tapped George Ryan for governor. Ryan, under criminal investigation, opted not to seek re-election and was later convicted on federal corruption charges, which led to Blagojevich’s win in 2002.

Ryan’s tenure had ended a string of 26 years of Republican governance in the state and the growing power of Democrats, who still control the General Assembly, had raised the prospect of Illinois remaining a firmly blue state for decades.

Quinn survived low job approval numbers in winning his first election for governor four years ago, but he was unable to withstand the expensive, withering attacks lobbed at him by Rauner, who raised a record $66 million since entering the contest in March of last year. Of that amount, $27.6 million came from Rauner’s own pocket.

The outcome was affirmation of key campaign boasts repeated often by Rauner. “I’ve been a success at everything I’ve done,” he liked to tell voters. He also vowed to “shake up Springfield.”

In a powerful demonstration of the ever-growing ability of big money to influence the outcome of elections, Rauner used his commanding cash reserves to build a winning political organization from scratch.

For the 65-year-old Quinn, however, the loss likely puts an end to an improbable political career that catapulted him from crusading gadfly and perennial candidate for an array of offices to become the state’s chief executive.

Rauner’s victory culminates a campaign that grew increasingly dark for both sides. The Republican accused Quinn of corruption while the Democrat portrayed Rauner as a tax evader. Quinn ran ads seeking to tie Rauner to controversial deaths at nursing homes run by a chain once owned by his investment company. Rauner hit back with ads blaming Quinn for deaths of youngsters being monitored by state child welfare officials.

Rauner declared Quinn “the worst governor in America” whose fumbling leadership had left the state “in a death spiral.” Quinn slapped Rauner as an “out-of-touch billionaire” who “made a fortune off the misfortune of vulnerable human beings.”

Those themes even carried over into campaign stunts. Rauner stationed a campaign aide dressed as Blagojevich outside Quinn campaign events. Quinn sent his own aide in a chicken suit to stand outside Rauner appearances, while Rauner swiped back by campaigning beside actual chickens.

Almost lost in the negativity was discussion of substantive strategies to deal with chronic financial problems weighing on state government.

As the incumbent, Quinn stuck to a stay-the-course position, arguing that his leadership has led to a slow but steady improvement in the state’s financial climate from the depths of the Great Recession and what is needed now is more of the same.

Rauner dismissed that as disastrous and promised to cut taxes and prime the state for explosive job growth with reduced regulation. However, he outlined few details about how he planned to accomplish those goals and still make ends meet.

As governor, being vague will no longer be an option. There is much on the table for Rauner, who has said he’ll push a pro-business agenda and spent the primary attacking public employee union bosses. Sitting on the other side will be Speaker Madigan, whose Democrats rely on significant financial and campaign support from organized labor.

Rauner spent much of the campaign castigating Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike as being part of a “corrupt” system in Springfield. Even before the election, some Republican lawmakers privately chafed over Rauner’s leadership style and proposals such as an expansion of the state’s sales tax to some services as contradicting GOP philosophy.

Midterm Elections,

“It’s going to happen a lot,” Rauner said of top legislators telling him “no.” But just as he sought late in the campaign to downplay the harsh rhetoric that he used in the beginning days, Rauner maintained his background in equity investment showed he was a “team builder” who also has worked with Democratic Chicago mayors and aldermen.

Rauner’s transition to governor actually began months before Election Day, said one campaign insider who was not authorized to speak publicly, with a closely held assemblage of veterans from previous Illinois Republican governors and GOP insiders. Their work included shaping the potential personnel of a Rauner Cabinet.

Rauner said throughout the campaign that he was taking policy advice from associates of former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and help from Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s aides. Earlier this week, the Illinois Republican said that part of his immediate work was to “assemble a superstar ‘A’ team to turn the government around.”

“This matters so much to me, I’m just on a mission. I’m going right to work,” he said.

Rauner, a twice-married father of six whose wife runs an early childhood education initiative, has become a polarizing force in the struggle to improve education. A supporter of charter schools and vouchers to help subsidize private school tuition, Rauner also has been highly critical of teachers unions.

During the campaign, Rauner noted his upbringing by mainly mentioning the modest life of his grandfather, who worked for a dairy. He reminisced about growing up in a small Deerfield ranch house but did not discuss that parts of his youth were spent in Lake Forest and Scottsdale, Ariz.

In discussing his father, Rauner said he was an electrical engineer at Schaumburg-based Motorola but often did not note that the elder Rauner also was a lawyer who ran the patent department at the electronics giant and rose to its senior vice president.

Rauner graduated from Dartmouth and then earned a graduate degree in business at Harvard University. Not long after Harvard, he joined a new equity investment firm in Chicago that would grow into a multibillion-dollar enterprise and eventually carry his name.

Rauner chaired GTCR Golder Rauner for a quarter-century before leaving in 2012. Through GTCR, Rauner became wealthy quickly and also gained prominence in the city’s business community.

Mayor Richard Daley named Rauner to head the city’s nonprofit convention bureau. Daley’s successor, Rahm Emanuel, was helped by Rauner, who underwrote education initiatives including a $2 million donation for a bonus fund to reward principals.

Rauner has said he met Emanuel when the future mayor was making millions as an investment banker and brokered GTCR’s purchase of an alarm company.

Remember When Obama Was The Messiah?

Screen Shot 2014-11-02 at 3.19.37 PM

Education Editor

This week, the man who once filled arenas like a rock star suffered the indignity of Wisconsin Democrats walking out on him as he stumped for another struggling Democrat, Mary Burke. Obama’s visit to Wisconsin coincided with the disappearance of Burke’s modest lead in statewide polls. She now trails her opponent, Scott Walker, by seven points.

The very same thing happened in deep-blue Maryland last week, where the bleachers reportedly began emptying while Obama was giving a speech. The Republican gubernatorial candidate then enjoyed a nine-point polling boost.

Adding still further to Obama’s misery, a new nationwide poll from Harvard’s Institute of Politics shows his Svengali-like hold over America’s 18-to-29-year-old voting cohort has finally loosened.

Here, then, is a fond tribute to those halcyon times when a bunch of dupes waxed ridiculously about Obama as if he was some kind of worship-worthy deity, not a crappy leader with no experience.

Obama halo Reuters Damir SagoljObama’s speeches “enmesh you in a grander moment, as if history has stopped flowing passively by, and, just for an instant, contracted around you, made you aware of its presence, and your role in it,” parochial Washington rube Ezra Klein spouted in January 2008 in The American Prospect. “He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh, over color, over despair. The other great leaders I’ve heard guide us towards a better politics, but Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves, to the place where America exists as a glittering ideal, and where we, its honored inhabitants, seem capable of achieving it, and thus of sharing in its meaning and transcendence.”

Rally with Barack Obama and Guest Oprah WinfreyIn December 2007, some 30,000 people showed up at a football stadium in South Carolina to see Obama and his campaign buddy, Oprah Winfrey. Both spoke like preachers on the old-time gospel hour — about Obama. “I give all praise and honor to God,” Obama said, according to Politico. “Look at the day the Lord has made.” Meanwhile, Winfrey spoke about a quasi-holy man. “We need a leader who’s going to touch our souls. Who’s going to make us feel differently about one another. Who’s going to remind us that we are one another’s keepers. That we are only as strong as the weakest among us.” The once-popular daytime talk show host also spoke about “The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman,” a novel and movie from the 1970s. This old woman would ask all children, “Are you the one? Are you the one?” “Today we have the answer to Miss Pittman’s question,” Winfrey confidently predicted. “South Carolina: I do believe he’s the one.”

AFP 522039319 A GOV USA MAToni Morrison, the most overrated novelist in human history (and the person who once called Bill Clinton America’s first black president), was an early rider on the Obama Messiah Express. In January 2008, she wrote a letter praising Obama for possessing “a creative imagination which coupled with brilliance equals wisdom.” He had an “un-embargoed” “moral center,” she gushed, according to the New York Observer. He had “courage instead of mere ambition.” Indeed, the novelist most famous for being forced upon a generation of American high schoolers babbled: “There have been a few prescient leaders in our past, but you are the man for this time.”

Obama Appears on “Hardball with Chris Matthews”MSNBC talking head Chris Matthews has semi-coherently called a multitude of things racist since the beginning of the Obama presidency including workfare, Sarah Palin, the Constitution, not liking Washington, D.C. and, in fact, scrutinizing Obama’s presidency. In February 2008, Matthews was hopelessly indoctrinated in the ways of Obama worship. “It’s part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama’s speech,” Matthews famously bleated, according to the Media Research Center. “My, I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often.”

US Democratic presidential candidate IllIn an almost textbook-perfect, dude-you-must-be-joking example of messianic Obama zeal, San Francisco columnist Mark Morford frothed in June 2008 that Obama “isn’t really one of us.” “Many spiritually advanced people I know (not coweringly religious, mind you, but deeply spiritual) identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment. These kinds of people actually help us evolve. They are philosophers and peacemakers of a very high order, and they speak not just to reason or emotion, but to the soul.”

Senate Dem Aide: White House ‘Has Sunk From Annoying To Embarrassing’

Screen Shot 2014-10-22 at 4.14.49 PM


Sure, the Democrats are taking the rest of us down with them. But that shouldn’t keep us from having a laugh at their expense as their world falls apart and they claw at each other’s throats. Tee-hee!

Josh Kraushaar, National Journal:

The relationship between the White House and Senate Democrats hit a new low Tuesday evening after the administration’s press office released a transcript of first lady Michelle Obama’s appearance in Iowa on behalf of Democratic Senate candidate Bruce Braley. The problem: The subject line of the e-mail referred to Braley as the “Democratic candidate for governor…”

Governor, Senator, whatever. Who can keep track? The White House has better things to do. Like booking Obama’s next tee time.

Indicating the sensitivity of the mistake, top Senate Democratic officials wasted no time lashing out at the Obama administration’s political team in response, suggesting it was acting like a junior varsity operation two weeks before the midterms…

“The ineptitude of the White House political operation has sunk from annoying to embarrassing,” one senior Senate Democratic aide told National Journal.

As for Obama’s claim that the lurkers support him in e-mail the Democrats fleeing from him in droves are actually big fans of his behind the scenes? My suspicions have proven correct:

Another Senate official told the Washington Post that Obama’s comments were “not devised with any input from Senate leadership.”

He doesn’t need anybody else’s input. He just says whatever he thinks will protect his ego and get him through the next five minutes. Other people’s concerns have nothing to do with it. Consensus reality has nothing to do with it.

The rest of us caught on years ago: Obama screws up everything he touches, and then he lies to cover it up. Now, less than two weeks before the midterms, even his ostensible allies can’t escape it anymore.

Enjoy their mounting panic.

White House Caught Doctoring Transcript of Obama’s Speech


Administration “effectively lying to the American people”

by Paul Joseph Watson | October 21, 2014

Amidst a debate about White House control over pool reporters who have to get approval before submitting their stories, the Obama administration has been caught doctoring the transcript of remarks made by President Obama during a DNC fundraiser.

The official White House transcript of the speech significantly amends the following passage;

“One of the nice things about being home is actually that it’s a little bit like a time capsule. Because Michelle and I and the kids, we left so quickly that there’s still junk on my desk, including some unpaid bills (laughter) – I think eventually they got paid — but they’re sort of stacked up. And messages, newspapers and all kinds of stuff.”

The version that appeared in the official transcript excised the part relating to unpaid bills to read, “there’s still junk on my desk, including some — newspapers and all kinds of stuff.”

The White House later claimed that the words did not appear in the transcript because the stenographer did not hear the omitted phrase. The transcript was subsequently amended with the word “inaudible” in place of the missing phrase.

As veteran White House reporter Keith Koffler notes, “Somehow, it wasn’t inaudible to the White House pool reporters, who picked up on the discrepancy between what was said and what was in the transcript.”

Koffler charges that the administration is outstripping even the Bush White House for propaganda on this front, accusing them of “effectively lying to the American people.”

The controversy arrives amidst an ongoing altercation between White House pool reporters and the Obama administration over freedom of the press.

Under the current system, the White House is able to demand changes to pool reports before distributing them to news outlets, federal agencies, and congressional offices.

The Obama administration has on numerous occasions asked the reports to be changed, prompting the White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) to set up a replacement distribution model which is now gaining traction and threatens to derail the Obama administration’s control over pool reports.



CDC compares spread of Ebola to AIDS while White House talks fashion


The White House somehow found the time to host a fashion show despite government officials admitting they are completely unprepared for an AIDS-like Ebola pandemic in the U.S.

Even though a customs agent admitted his department is not trained or equipped to deal with individuals infected with Ebola and the Secretary of Health and Human Services revealed there may be others with Ebola in the U.S., in addition to a mainstream reporter admitting “we’re screwed,” the Obama administration still held the “Fashion Education Workshop” on Wednesday in the largest room in the White House.

“All right, we’re just going to break this up one moment and just say, is this not cool?” Michelle Obama said to those in attendance. “I mean, come on. You’re in the White House. There are some of the most impressive people in fashion here to teach you all, and to reach out and to mentor you.”

“And there’s food. What more could you ask for?”

Perhaps a temporary ban on travelers from Ebola-struck countries, for one? Or health officials who actually follow proper disease protocols meant to prevent a deadly virus such as Ebola from spreading?

Right now Ebola is spreading with an intensity not seen since the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s.

“I would say that in the 30 years I’ve been working in public health, the only thing like this has been AIDS,” Dr. Tom Frieden, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said to the United Nations.

Yesterday the first confirmed case of Ebola in the U.S., Thomas Eric Duncan, died in a Dallas hospital and others are showing symptoms of Ebola, including a Dallas Co. Deputy Sheriff who was ordered to enter Duncan’s apartment without protective gear.

Two other deputies are feeling sick, according to Scott Guiselman, President of the Dallas Sheriff Fraternal Order of Police.

“We were not provided with Hazmat suits or anything like that,” he told CNN.

And this wasn’t a freak accident but rather the norm in the government’s response to Ebola, which is unlikely to improve if the White House’s preoccupation with a fashion show is any indication.

Even the recently announced “fever screenings” at five U.S. airports are nothing more than security theater because the screenings can be beaten with Ibuprofen which reduces fever.

“The fever-screening instruments run low and aren’t that accurate,” Sean Kaufman, who previously worked with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said. “People can take Ibuprofen to reduce their fever enough to pass screening, and why wouldn’t they?”