OBAMA AUTHORIZES FIRST WAVE OF 9,OOO UN-APPROVED MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS FOR U.S. RESETTLEMENT

Screen Shot 2014-12-19 at 6.03.26 PM
The Obama administration assures us that these “poor, displaced peoples” have been hand-picked by the United Nations. Of that, I am 100% sure he is telling the truth.

GIVE ME YOUR POOR, TIRED, HUDDLED MASSES YEARNING TO LIVE IN AMERICA UNDER SHARIA LAW

Barack Obama has only two years left in his reign as America’s king, but boy oh boy is he planning on getting some stuff done. The US Department of State announced on its website that the Obama administration has approved over 9,000 Syrian Muslim immigrants, hand-selected by the United Nations, for admission into the United States as residents.

“We applaud the 25 countries that have agreed to resettle Syrian refugees, including some who will be accepting UNHCR refugee referrals for the first time. The United States accepts the majority of all UNHCR referrals from around the world. Last year, we reached our goal of resettling nearly 70,000 refugees from nearly 70 countries. And we plan to lead in resettling Syrians as well. We are reviewing some 9,000 recent UNHCR referrals from Syria. We are receiving roughly a thousand new ones each month, and we expect admissions from Syria to surge in 2015 and beyond.” source

For all you bright scholars out there, do the math. If 9,000 Muslim immigrants from Syria are let loose in the United States, how many of those 9,000 are either terrorist or have terror ties? And 9,000 is just the very beginning. The State Department clearly acknowledges that this number will surge dramatically in 2015 and beyond.

Aside from the obvious terror implications, what will all this resettlement cost per year? And here’s a better question – how come Obama didn’t resettle the displaced Christian refugees from Iraq? Now that is a question I would like an answer to…

DERSHOWITZ SAYS SONY HAS OBLIGATION TO RELEASE “INTERVIEW” FOR FREE ON INTERNET

Company and stockholders have duty to forego profit and “protect America’s freedoms”

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax on Friday Sony Pictures has an obligation to “go beyond profits” and release its controversial movie about the assassination of Kim Jong-un for free.

“We have to make sure that whoever did this pays a heavy consequence and they have to know that it can’t ever succeed and the best way to make it fail is for all the studios to get together now and to release the film free, on the Internet, so that not 10 to 20 million people will see it, but hundreds of millions of people will see it,” Dershowitz said. “North Korea or whoever is behind this has to learn, you try to censor in America more people will see your film than ever before.”

He said the company and it stockholders have a duty to forego profit and “protect America’s freedoms.”
It is estimated the company will lose $90 million if it fails to market the film.

The subsidiary of transnational Sony pulled the film after alleged hackers threatened to attack people who view it during the holidays. Cryptic messages urged people to “remember the 11th of September 2001.”

The U.S. concluded on Friday North Korea was responsible for attacking Sony Pictures with malware after the film was released.

There is, however, scant evidence the communist regime in Pyongyang is responsible for the hack.

“I still don’t see anything that in a court would convict North Korea beyond reasonable doubt,” security researcher Brian Honan told the BBC after the FBI said North Korea is responsible.

Muslim Complains About Bacon Sign; Restaurant Removes Citing Safety Concerns

Screen Shot 2014-12-19 at 3.41.48 PM

By Jennifer Burke

The American breakfast favorite is under attack in Vermont. After a Muslim woman complained in a community forum about a sign within her city with a picture of bacon, the restaurant who posted the sign removed it out of ‘respect for diversity’ and ‘concerns for safety.’

Breitbart reports that Sneakers Bistro, a restaurant located in Winooski, Vermont, placed an advertising sign in an area where local businesses were allowed to advertise in exchange for helping to maintain city flowerbeds. As a restaurant known for its breakfast, they posted a sign that pictured bacon along with the saying “Sneakers Yields Bacon.”

A woman, who identified herself as Muslim, posted in a community forum that she was personally offended by the sign. The unidentified woman said the sign was “insensitive to those who do not consume pork.”

After it was brought to their attention, the owners of Sneakers Bistro removed the sign and posted the following message on their Facebook page.

Screen Shot 2014-12-19 at 3.41.48 PM

Screen Shot 2014-12-19 at 3.43.32 PM

According to local station WPTZ, the owners of Sneakers Bistro said they reached out to the individual who complained and regret any harm caused by their sign. The city manager , Katherine “Deac” Decarreau, seemingly praised the decision to remove the sign saying, ” The cool part of living in a diverse community is that it’s not always comfortable. It’s a fascinating place with lots of opportunities for conversation. The City has to pay attention to a lot of factors while acting within what we can regulate.”

Many residents did not agree with the removal of the sign. One resident expressed their sentiment stating, ““I respect her religion and her right to believe what she wants but I’m pretty sure the first amendment extends to bacon and the selling of it.”

No Liberal Feminist Outrage Over ISIS Slaughter Of 150 Women

Screen Shot 2014-12-18 at 3.29.03 PM

By Joseph R. Carducci, December 18, 2014.

This is yet another example of how the whole idea of Islamic Holy War, or jihad, is just a bunch of crap. It is also very interesting to see how the liberal media has been coddling the Islamic State, even after many of their brutalities have come to light. There has not even been any outrage by American feminists over how they treat women.

No Feminist Outrage Over ISIS’ Horrific Treatment of Women

You are probably familiar with the Islamic idea that by dying in a jihad the men will go immediately to paradise, where they will be given 72 virgins who will do all of their sexual bidding. Of course, the Islamic State has changed this, claiming to now have the authority to offer their soldiers as many as 144 virgins upon their death at the hands of the infidel (that’s you and me, by the way). Of course, we never hear any feminist groups in the West claiming just how discriminatory the Islamic faith is to women. Could you imagine if any Republican politician got up and said these same things? Oh my, how they would by lambasted by every feminist and women’s rights group in the country!

The Iraqi Ministry of Human Rights is now claiming the Islamic State has murdered 150 women simply for refusing to marry or perform sexual acts with their fighters. According to a Ministry Statement:

“At least 150 females, including pregnant women, were executed in Fallujah by a militant named Abu Anas Al Libi after they refused to accept jihad marriage. Many families were also forced from the province’s northern town of Al Wafa after hundreds of residents received death threats.”

ISIS Continues to Slaughter Women En Masse

The victims were also reportedly buried in mass graves in the city. On top of this, the Islamic State also slaughtered more than 50 people from the Al Bu Nimr tribe in the Anbar province, where fighting continues. This massacre also included at least six women and four children, who were publicly executed one by one after being lined up. Before this, they had also kidnapped 17 others and a separate massacre of 98 people had also preceded these events.

Lest you think this is entirely about Islamic differences or philosophy, it should be stated that members of this tribe are also Sunni Muslims, just like the prevailing belief of the Islamic State. It would appear the tribe is now seen as a threat.

‘True’ Islam

We already have heard reports that these supposedly pure militants who are concerned with the spread of ‘true’ Islam run brothels and keep sex slaves. And they have found at least one good use of Western women: to perform sexual jihad for their fighters. This was made public in a 2013 edict, claiming it was to ‘boost the morale’ of those engaged in the jihad.

These terrorist cowards have indeed set up brothels, some of which are being run by British women. They place kidnapped females in these places after capturing towns and cities, after they have already killed many others. And the worldwide jihad continues.

Just maybe this is indeed what true Islam is all about? Our Muslim President Obama has also filled his cabinet and advisers with Muslims as well. Is it any wonder why there has not been any real outcry against all of this brutality directed against women by the Islamic State? What do YOU think? Where are all the feminists….where is Hillary and the other liberal activists? Crickets, folks…now ask yourself why…