The videos in this post contain strong language and disturbing content; viewer discretion is advised.
The Right Scoop also alerted TheBlaze to an additional video in which King Noble proclaims white people are responsible for the future killings of whites, which he said will happen more frequently. Watch:
Original story below.
An apparent Black Lives Matter activist reportedly delivered a shocking and violently racist rant during a live Internet broadcast on BlogTalkRadio Tuesday night, declaring it is “open season on killing whites and white police officers.”
The host, who goes by “King Noble,” associates himself with the Black Lives Matter and “f*** yo flag 911” movements.
“To me, what the Houston, Texas, brutal execution before the public represents to me is it’s open season on killing whites and white police officers — and probably killing cops period,” he said. “It’s unavoidable, inescapable. It’s funny that that now we are moving to a time where the predator will become the prey.”
After claiming that blacks can win a “race war” against whites and praising the execution of the Texas deputy, “King Noble” then made a sickening prediction.
“Today, we live in a time when the white man will be picked off, and there’s nothing he can do about it,” he said. “His day is up, his time is up. We will witness more executions and killing of white people and cops than we ever have before.”
The host added, “It’s about to go down. It’s open season on killing white people and crackas.”
When a scared, destitute stranger and his entire family from a foreign country enter your home uninvited and demand you take care of them for the unforeseeable future (like feeding them, housing them, providing their medical care etc.) surely you comply. You must! Because compassion. Wait, you don’t let strangers into your house and provide for them for all of time? RACIST.
The Netherlands have gotten realistic about these “asylum seekers” and how long they can stay free of cost. Why? A number of reasons. Obviously because the Dutch are racists who don’t have hearts and cannot show any kind of goodwill towards these poor people flooding across their borders from Syria and Libya. The other reason is because, well, the Netherlands can’t afford to let foreigners mooch off the government dole. But you won’t see the second reason in the leftist media much. Remember, facts are secondary to feelings.
Prime Minister Mark Rutte has defended the measures, saying it was “crazy” to offer indefinite assistance to those who failed to qualify as refugees.
“We are talking about the group that can go back, whose governments would take them back, but they don’t want to go back,” he said.
In Britain, more than 60 per cent of asylum applications are rejected. Most people then have a right to an appeal, but the majority still receive negative decisions. The cost of then ejecting people forcibly is expensive, leading to accusations that the Government is deliberately making life as difficult as possible for failed asylum seekers to force people to leave.
Of course the UN, who doesn’t let foreigners in their symbolic houses either, has said all of this Netherlands not allowing a free flow of immigrants into their country and mooch off the government stuff, is just wrong. Because, you guessed it… racism. What else?
But the changes have been criticised by charities and the UN itself, whose Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination said the basic needs of migrants should be provided unconditionally.
“As long as they are in the Netherlands, they have to enjoy minimum standards of living,” said Ion Diaconu, who helped write a UN report criticising the Dutch policy proposal.
That’s right. Not giving foreigners free stuff is racist. Remember that when a foreigner breaks down the door to your home and demands asylum.
If you defend your household? Well that’s double-secret racism. Because, tolerance.
by BEN SHAPIRO
Details continued to emerge about the behavior and history of black, gay Virginia shooter Vester Flanagan II, aka Bryce Williams, in the aftermath of brutal slaying of two white journalists on live television on Wednesday.
Williams’ blackness and homosexuality are relevant only because Williams used them as rationales for the murders, explaining in a 23-page manifesto that he felt justified in his murders because of racism and homophobia. He said he wanted a “race war” and, on Twitter, specifically accused Alison Parker, one of his victims, of racist comments.
Naturally, some on the left bought Williams’ version of events. Sally Kohn of CNN tweeted that Williams “was mentally unstable AND appears to have acted out of sense of victimization i have no reason to believe not justified.”
It turns out that Williams did have an unjustified victim complex. According to The New York Post, Williams took nearly everything as a racial insult. Trevor Fair, a cameraman at WDBJ, said Parker would say, “The reporter’s out in the field,” and Williams would respond, “What are you saying, cotton fields? That’s racist.” When a manager brought in watermelon for employees, Williams reportedly said, “You’re doing that because of me… You guys are calling me out because I’m black.” He even accused 7-Eleven of racism for selling watermelon-flavored Slurpees.
Bryce Williams may have been mentally ill. But he was the ultimate product of the left’s microaggression society, seeking offense everywhere and then lashing out at others based on a perceived sense of victimization. Some victimization is objectively true, but that doesn’t mean that all claims of victimization are. The notion that subjective self-assessment of victimization should take precedence over objective fact is deeply dangerous.
In The Atlantic’s September cover story, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education President Greg Lukianoff and New York University social psychologist Jonathan Haidt write about the rise of the “microaggression” culture on college campuses. “A movement is arising, undirected and driven largely by students, to scrub campuses clean of words, ideas, and subjects that might cause discomfort or give offense,” they say. They continue:
Microaggressions are small actions or word choices that seem on their face to have no malicious intent but that are thought of as a kind of violence nonetheless…. The recent collegiate trend of uncovering allegedly racist, sexist, classist, or otherwise discriminatory microaggressions doesn’t incidentally teach students to focus on small or accidental slights. Its purpose is to get students to focus on them and then relabel the people who have made such remarks as aggressors.
The effect of attempting to bar “microaggressions” on campus: a generation of mentally ill people. “Schools may be training students in thinking styles that will damage their careers and friendships, along with their mental health,” they write. Further, perceiving everything as a “microaggression” leads to the belief that any aggression against the supposed victimizer is justified – “microaggression” should be met with actual aggression.
Yet such a “microaggression” mentality has been extended to federal law:
Out of fear of federal investigations, universities are now applying that standard—defining unwelcome speech as harassment—not just to sex, but to race, religion, and veteran status as well. Everyone is supposed to rely upon his or her own subjective feelings to decide whether a comment by a professor or a fellow student is unwelcome, and therefore grounds for a harassment claim. Emotional reasoning is now accepted as evidence.
And such “microaggression” mentality – the idea that your subjective belief in your victimization at the hands of a racist-homophobic-sexist-transphobic-heteronormative-cisgender society – has been extended far beyond campuses. As riots raged in Ferguson over the completely manufactured story of Michael Brown’s killing – rioters suggested that Officer Darren Wilson executed Brown and that Brown raised his hands and surrendered, all of which was false — President Barack Obama explained, “there are still problems and communities of color aren’t just making these problems up.” Of course, members of the Ferguson community had made it up in the case of Michael Brown. But Obama continued, “Separating that from this particular decision, there are issues in which the law too oftenfeels as if it is being applied in discriminatory fashion.”
Feels, not is. That distinction embodies the entire leftist worldview: so long as someone has a subjective perception, we must treat that subjective perception as reality. If a man perceives himself to be a woman, we must all pretend that he is a woman; if a black person feels that he was victimized, we must treat him as a victim. Subjective perception rules over fact.
And so, today, a Chicago police officer has been placed under investigation and castigated by the Chicago Police Department for this video exchange with two black men he had pulled over:
BLACK MAN #1: “We don’t trust y’all. You heard about Mike Brown.”
OFFICER: “Mike Brown deserved it.”
BLACK MAN #2: “Mike Brown should’ve shot his ass in the face.”
Chicago PD responded with this statement: “CPD prides itself on fostering productive relationships with communities to help make Chicago safer. The comments in this video are troubling and do not represent the views of this department.”
Similarly, the Seattle Police Department was hit in 2011 with a Department of Justicefinding requiring new standards on policing, not due to racial discrimination – the DOJ admitted there was no “pattern or practice of racial discriminatory policing” – but due to the fact that “many community members believe that SPD engages in discriminatory policing.” Rioters in Ferguson riot because they perceive themselves to be victims. Rioters in Baltimore riot because they perceive themselves to be victims. Bryce Williams shot two innocent white people because he perceived himself to be a victim.
Leftism requires widespread perception of victimhood, because without that perception of victimhood, no government corrective would be required. There’s only one problem: glorifying self-appointed victims makes them more common. It encourages people to find their victimization. Then, once self-appointed victims have punched their ticket for first class seats on the politically correct train, they feel justified in criminal activity – and sadly, leftists often grant them the freedom to pursue that criminality. Bryce Williams subjectively appointed himself one of those victims, and then used that status to murder his real, objective victims.
Shooter shot the deputy in the back of the head and then three times in the back
HOUSTON, Texas — A Harris County Sheriff’s Deputy was shot execution style at a gas station while reportedly in full uniform. The deputy was filling up his patrol car. Witnesses told Breitbart Texas the shooter shot the deputy in the back of the head and then three times in the back. This tragedy comes within days of a group of Black radicals calling for “lynching whites and killing cops,” as Breitbart Texas recently reported. Witnesses also told Breitbart Texas that the shooter was a black male.
The shooting occurred late Friday evening in Northwest Harris County just outside of Houston. One witness who spoke to this writer said he knew the deputy personally and had just spoken with him about five minutes before the shooting.
He said he saw the man shoot his friend and speed off in a red pickup truck. He said he followed the truck for about two miles until he lost it at a major highway intersection. The truck turned onto Highway 6 from West Road and disappeared.
Deputies in the area confirmed they were indeed searching for a red Ford Ranger pickup truck.
Two teenage girls told Breitbart Texas they saw the shooter fire one shot into the back of the head of the deputy who was simply getting gas for his vehicle. After the deputy fell, they heard three or four other shots. According to the first witness, those shots were fired into the deputy’s back.
The execution of the deputy came just days after black radicals went on an internet radio show hosted from Texas and called for the lynching of white people and the killing of cops to “turn the tide” against blacks being killed by cops. Breitbart Texas reported on Friday morning the details of the radio show and the comments that were made.
One black man spoke up saying they needed to kill “cops that are killing us. The other black male on the show said, “That will be the best method right there.”
The shooter is described as male, dark complexion, five-foot-ten to six-foot. He was said to be wearing a white t-shirt and red shorts.
Witnesses said a LifeFlight helicopter came and picked up the deputy to take him to the hospital, but they believe he was dead at the scene.
The first witness showed this reporter a photo of the deputy with his children. He was highly emotional as he was speaking. “He was the best guy you can imagine as a friend,” the witness said. “He was always coming to me and asking if he could do anything for me.”
Breitbart Texas will follow this developing story.
Surveillance footage clearly shows suspect is African-American
by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON | AUGUST 29, 2015
Some media outlets are refusing to identify the race of the suspect involved in the murder of a sheriff’s deputy in Houston last night, despite the fact that he is clearly black.
At around 8:30pm last night, Deputy Darren Goforth was pumping gas into his vehicle in full uniform before he was approached by a man who shot him from behind multiple times.
“Police described the suspect as a dark-complexioned male who is believed to be between 20 and 25 years old, and stands about 5-foot-10 to 6-feet tall,” reports the Associated Press.
Surveillance footage of the suspect clearly shows that he is black.
Are we at a point now in America where it is politically incorrect to identify the race of wanted murderers?
If the killer was white, would the AP describe him as a “light-complexioned male”?
The murder took place just days after a group of black radicals called for “lynching whites and killing cops,” and less than 72 hours after Bryce Williams gunned down TV reporter Alison Parker and cameraman Adam Ward live on air.
In his manifesto, Williams said the murder was his contribution to starting a “race war” in America.
Until the suspect in last night’s shooting has been caught it will be impossible to determine his motive, but the random nature of the incident suggests there’s every chance it could be related to ongoing racial tensions that have been fueled by both the media and the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement.
“We’ve been warned of things like this, because of public sentiment nationally and events over the last few years,” said Bob Goerlitz, president of the Harris County Deputies Organization. “It’s just horrific. That’s the only way to describe it.”