BREAKING: Kanye West Announces He’ll Leave The United States Because Of Racism

Screen Shot 2014-07-29 at 12.12.01 PM

Yep, the United States is so racist that Kanye West was able to become a multi-multi millionaire here. He probably does need to travel more to find out how little racism affects success in the United States compared to most of the rest of the world. This reminds me of when Johnny Depp said he and his family were moving to Paris, France because the United States was too violent. Then the reality of Muslim riots in Paris with many cars being burned each night set in. Remember that? Yeah, after a few years Depp moved back to the States. Kanye West leaving the U.S. because it is so racist? The U.S. is so racist that it allows you to come and go as you please on your own private jet Kanye. What an elitist ignoramus.


Recently, rapper and egomaniac Kanye West made headlines after a racist comment was directed at his fiancé Kim Kardashian. The incident led to Kanye punching a teenager in the face.
According to reports, Kim was entering a medical building in California when the teenager called her a “n-word” lover. After being told that he should not use the word, the teenager allegedly threatened to murder Kim.
When Kanye heard of the news, he walked up to the teen and punched him in the face. Now, it appears that the rapper is threatening to leave the United States, claiming that he is dreading explaining to his daughter the negativity in American culture, society, and history.
According to West, “we’ve got enough money to buy our own island or some sh*t. I’ll be damned if I raise my daughter around ignorance and flat-out blatant racism.


Melissa Harris-Perry exemplifies network’s plummeting ratings


MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry exemplified why the network’s ratings continue to plunge when she compared opponents of illegal immigration to advocates of race segregation.

During a segment on her Saturday show, the host likened Texas Governor Rick Perry’s decision to send National Guard troops to the border to Arkansas Governor Orval Faubas’ move to use Guard troops to prevent black children from attending Little Rock Central High School, which was racially segregated, in 1957.

“Rick Perry was preceded in his call to send armed troops to confront children by Arkansas Gov. Orval Faubus, and he, of course, called the National Guard to stop the Little Rock Nine from their first day of school at Central High,” said Perry.

“The presence of children on buses integrating Boston schools in 1974 didn’t stop white crowds from confronting them with slurs and threats of violence. Nor did it give pause to the adults who hurled objects and insults at 6-year-old Ruby Bridges on the day she became the first African-Americans child to desegregate an elementary school. And so when we look to children seeking safety at our borders and see instead an invasion to be defended against, a contagion to be contained or a drain on resources that we just don’t want to share – that is a side of history on which we are choosing to stand.”
“Not only is Perry’s comparison between Governor Perry and segregationist Orval Faubas highly offensive but it is historically inaccurate,” writes Jeffrey Meyer. “The Arkansas Democrat deployed the National Guard to prevent African-Americans who were citizens of the United States from accessing public schools. In contrast, Governor Rick Perry called on the National Guard to help stop the flood of non-U.S. citizens from entering the country illegally, which is in no way comparable to the treatment of African Americans during the days of segregation.”

This is by no means the first time that Perry has courted controversy by offering views seen as abhorrent by her ideological adversaries. Last year, the host produced a video promo for the network in which she argued that children no longer belong to their parents and are part of the collective community.

Perry’s rhetoric won’t come as a surprise to those who have tracked MSNBC’s continuous use of race-baiting as a means of demonizing conservatives and libertarians.

Last year, MSNBC pundit Michael Eric Dyson, who previously argued that it is impossible for black people to be racist, said that Americans would not understand racism until white kids were being killed in the same numbers as blacks.

The network’s hosts and contributors have routinely argued that vehement criticism of Barack Obama, including use of words like “socialist,” is code for racism.

Perry herself was forced to apologize last year when members of her show panel mocked Mitt Romney and his family for adopting a black baby.

The network’s reliance on such tactics has not abated despite plummeting ratings. Following the release of figures last year that showed MSNBC had lost over half of its viewers in the previous 12 month period, the network lost a further 24% of its audience.

VIDEO: Black Conservatives Not Welcome @ Annual NAACP Convention

Video Uploader: “Black conservatives are not welcome at the NAACP. In this video, Black conservatives are met with hostility by a member of the NAACP during their annual convention at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas. The NAACP member confronting the Black conservatives would like them removed from the conference because she doesn’t feel they have a right to voice their opinions which run counter to NAACP Progressive ethos.”

NAACP, Leaders Worry Lower Black Turnout Will Impact Voter ID Laws

Screen Shot 2014-07-23 at 4.22.14 PM

By Joseph R. Carducci
July 23, 2014

Here we go again, folks. This is just another example of how the NAACP and civil rights leaders really don’t care about the people they claim to represent. In fact, this shows just how hypocritical they are and willing to sell out the black community in exchange for a little bit of power, influence, and money.

So, in case you don’t know, the annual NAACP convention is happening in Las Vegas right now. Many of these black leaders have expressed concern about the dwindling African American turnout that seems to be a foregone conclusion in the upcoming November midterm elections. They are afraid this will lead to the expansion of voter identification laws, saying how these types of laws make it harder for their community to actually vote in elections.

The funny thing is that despite all of this concern, black voters turned out in record numbers during the 2012 elections. This helped Barack Obama to maintain control of the White House. Additionally, it is thought this was the first time in American history when black voters actually turned out in a higher rate than white voters. Of course, they also point to the fact that this was a presidential race. Going back to the midterm elections of 2010, we saw blacks voting at a much lower rate and this led to (or so these leaders will argue) the Republicans winning control of the House of Representatives along with many state and local offices.

Current polling data shows that black voters are much less enthusiastic than white voters. This also leads many to think more white and Republican voters are going to turn out. These sheer numbers could mean the Republicans will have a better than average chance at re-taking control of the Senate, while also maintaining (and possibly even extending) their majority in the House.

Obviously, this is an eventuality the NAACP and other black leaders want to avoid. After all, they certainly don’t want their own power and influence to languish under Republican leadership.

Many black leaders have also been arguing that the Republican control of the House and also many positions at the state and local levels, particularly in the south, have already led to a “wave of voter suppression laws” and voter identification rules. Jotaka Eaddy, the NAACP voting rights director, even told a panel that 22 states have passed laws to increase identification requirements before voters are allowed to actually vote.

Now, these very same black leaders are trying to scare their community members into thinking that Republicans are going to stamp out their right to vote. Of course, the best way to fight voter fraud is by increasing the identification requirements, since many times those who vote illegally have very weak or thin documentation. Certainly no one with a valid piece of identification is going to be denied their right to vote, yet this is what the brainiacs in the NAACP would have their members believe.

What has also impressed me about this kind of thing is the sheer lack of faith the NAACP and black leaders seem to express in their own community. They are basically saying they think black people cannot be expected to comply with simple voter identification requirements. How insulting!

What do YOU think? Is the NAACP doing a disservice to their own members? Is their opposition to voter ID laws really just a front for something else? Have many black leaders abdicated their responsibility and are no longer really effective in helping their constituents? Should voter ID laws continue to be implemented?

Widow of Cop-Killer Upset that he Didn’t Kill More Cops


July 15, 2014 By Greg Campbell

ZCampbell The widow of a man who ambushed a rookie police officer for, apparently, no reason is now upset that the focus of sympathy is on the slain police officer and not her husband and is also upset that her husband did not murder more police officers.

Ladies and gentlemen, buckle your seatbelts; this is a special kind of crazy…

Angelique Campbell told News 12 in New Jersey, “He should’ve taken more [officers] with him.”

Her husband, Lawrence, was wanted for a previous murder, waited outside a Walgreen’s after taking a security guard’s gun and ambushed and murdered 23 year-old rookie officer Melvin Santiago.

Authorities believe that the ambush may have been for notoriety as Lawrence Campbell allegedly told a bystander to “Watch the TV news later, I’m going to be famous.” The 27 year-old gunman was shot and killed when police responded.

Angelique, however, was not concerned with the needless slaying of a police officer by her criminal husband but was, instead, disturbed that people have focused their sympathies on the murdered officer’s family.

“Sorry for the officer’s family. That’s, you know, whatever,” Campbell told News 12. “But, at the end of the day, [Lawrence] got a family too. All they care about is the officer.”

Campbell made the comments at a makeshift memorial for her dead husband, where friends and families propped up photos and liquor bottle and messages such as “Thugs in Peace.”

“He was a good man. He looked out for everybody on the block,” stated Campbell’s friend, Barbara Jones.

Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop was outraged by the memorial and the words of the callous widow, saying, “It doesn’t get much lower than this. [The memorial] won’t be there for the duration of the day.”
While there has always existed a criminal element in society, this level of callous disregard for human life is purely nauseating and a symptom of a society led astray. A man who served his community was viciously murdered in cold blood for, apparently, nothing more than a desire to have his name in the paper and the response by his widow speaks to a “me first” ideology that is present in 2 year-olds and remains too prevalent in society.

BOMBSHELL! Black Pastor: Thad Cochran Bought ‘Hundreds or Even Thousands’ of ‘Black Votes’

BOMBSHELL! Black Pastor: Thad Cochran Bought ‘Hundreds or Even Thousands’ of ‘Black Votes’

July 1, 2014 By Matthew Burke

Republican establishment-backed Senator Thad Cochran has been accused of dirty tricks and unethical tactics in the Mississippi GOP Senate primary runoff on June 24, but the accusations have just leapfrogged from the unethical to the highly illegal, making the validity of the election results questionable.

“They [Cochran campaign] told me to offer blacks $15 each and to vote for Thad,” said Reverend Stevie Fielder, a black pastor from the First Union Missionary Baptist Church, told Charles C. Johnson, in a shocking interview on Monday.

Fielder told Johnson (listen to interview below) that he brought “hundreds or even thousand” of blacks to the polls after being convinced by the Cochran campaign that Tea Party challenger, Mississippi State Senator Chris McDaniel, was a “racist.” Fielder says he was also offered $16,000 to by the Cochran campaign to pull off the vote buying scheme, but the campaign broke their promise and refused to pay him after he delivered the votes.

“They said they needed black votes,” Fielder said about the Cochran campaign’s scheme to buy Democrat votes in order to rig the election in his favor.

According to the report from Johnson on his Got News site, the vote buying scheme was implemented by Saleem Baird of the Cochran campaign, and Kirk Sims, a legislative aide to U.S. Senator Roger Wicker, Cochran’s junior colleague from Mississippi:
Text messages released to Got News and a recorded interview with Reverend Fielder confirmed that Saleem Baird, a staffer with the Cochran campaign and current legislative aide to U.S. Senator Roger Wicker, and Cochran campaign manager, Kirk Sims, were involved in a $15-per-vote cash bribery scheme to target members of the black community.

“They said they needed black votes,” said the Reverend Fielder on the phone. He says Baird told him to “give the fifteen dollars in each envelope to people as they go in and vote. You know, not right outside of the polling place but he would actually recruit people with the $15 dollars and they would go in and vote.” Fielder said he received thousands of dollars in envelopes from Baird and distributed them accordingly. Fielder also says he went to the campaign office on another occasion to pick up $300 in cash and was among a room full of people who were doing the same thing he was.
Reverend Fielder showed Johnson text messages from his cell phone, claiming they were from Baird, coordinating the money delivery in exchange for votes in favor of 76-year-old Thad Cochran, a 42-year Washington veteran.

Fielder told Johnson that Saleem Baird personally delivered the cash “from the campaign” to bribe the black voters.

According to the Cochran campaign, Cochran received 35,000 Democrat votes in the Republican runoff, but only 6,700 more votes than McDaniel overall, indicating that Democrats selected the GOP Senate nominee for the State of Mississippi.

It is illegal under several provisions of Mississippi law and federal law for campaign officials to bribe voters with cash. Such actions are punishable up to five years in jail. (MS Code 97-13-1; MS Code 97-13-3 (2013) (Federal Code 18 U.S.C. 597, U.S.C. 1973i(c)) Voter fraud schemes are not unusual for Mississippi. In 1999 Mississippi’s attorney general reported massive voter fraud allegations throughout the Magnolia state. In 2011, a Mississippi NAACP leader was sent to prison for voter fraud, according to the Daily Caller.

“They sold me on the fact that he [Chris McDaniel} was a racist,” said Reverend Fielder, explaining that his motivation for cooperating in the scheme wasn’t the money, but was to keep a “racist” from being elected. Fielder admitted he had no information to indicate that McDaniel was a racist, other than the assurances he received from the Cochran campaign.

“I thought what I did was wrong,” Fielder said apologetically.

Will Harry Reid Tell This 100% Navajo Indian High School Their ‘Redskins’ Mascot is Racist?

Will Harry Reid Tell This 100% Navajo Indian High School Their ‘Redskins’ Mascot is Racist?

Red Mesa High School, located on the Navajo Reservation in Red Mesa, Arizona, is a public school in which nearly 100% of it’s students are Navajo Indian.

Their mascot and logo?

The “Redskins.”

Yes, that’s right, the eeeevil and raaaacist term, the “Redskins.” It’s exactly the same name the Washington football team, the Redskins, have called themselves for seven decades.

The high school’s website even has a a tab titled “Redskins News” and features this logo:


Oh my, how “racist” is this Harry! How could this be Harry?

Why would a 100% Native American school name use as their own mascot a “racist” term?

Maybe Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid should be asked this important question of the day.

Harry Greed and other white elitist communists latest distraction/obsession is with forcing the Washington Redskins to change their name because they’ve determined, after decades of being silent on the word, that the term “Redskins,” a term that was chosen to HONOR Native Americans, must now be banned.

As the Middle East implodes, Obama’s restocking enemy terrorists, more Americans are dependent upon government handouts and out of the work force than ever before, Americans are being targeted by the Obama IRS for their political beliefs, and a plethora of other important issues of the day, changing the name of an NFL team is the focus of anti–free speech Democrats.

But will Harry force Red Mesa High School to change their name too? But then after the anti-free speech Democrat forces them to change their mascot, will he then force them to take the word “Red” out of “Red Mesa High School?”

Because we all know that word is racist too, right Harry? Tell us which words we can and cannot say, will ya Harry?

h/t: Mark Levin Show