“Dear John” Boehner, Conservatives are Breaking Up with You! | Three Percenter Nation (*NO MORE RINOS!*)

Screen Shot 2014-01-30 at 5.24.51 PM


Remember when you knew that it was time to “break up” with someone that you once felt something for but no longer shared those same feelings?

That’s why I’m writing my “Dear John” letter today to the Speaker of the House, John Boehner (R-Ohio).

I believe that my letter speaks for many conservative Republicans who believe that Boehner has lost his way. Having formed that opinion, it’s time for us to go our separate ways.

Please join me as I pen this letter to “Dear John”.

Dear John:

You are the Speaker of the House. That in and of itself says a lot about how others must have once valued your abilities to nobly carry out the requirements of such an austere office.

Your esteemed position was established in 1789 under the United States Constitution, during a time when the founding Fathers were highly respected and the Constitution was unquestionably the law of the land. It was created long before President Barack Obama was born and prior to his first “apology tour” around the world.

Your position is the second in the United States presidential line of succession, right after the Vice President and ahead of the President pro tempore of the U.S. Senate.

It’s a tremendous position of trust, honor, and power. The American people depend upon you to uphold that office with the dignity set forth in the Constitution and to represent them to the best of your ability.

While I can’t and don’t speak for everyone, I believe that you have failed the American people and have irrevocably lost their trust.

Several actions that you took have led me to this conclusion.

Who could forget the “Cromnibus” bill and the vote taken under your leadership, in which funding was extended for the Department of Homeland Security until February 2015 and funding for most of the federal government through September 2015, including Obamacare?

The bill did nothing, at the time, to block Obama’s illegal immigration actions which granted quasi-legal status, work permits and provided Social Security numbers to illegal immigrants.

Back in November 2014, right after the Republicans won the majority vote for both the House and Senate, you warned Obama against signing an illegal immigration executive order on amnesty and told him that the House was going to vote to repeal Obamacare.

You said then, “I’ve made clear to the president that if he acts unilaterally on his own, outside of his authority, he will poison the well and there will be no chance for immigration reform moving in this Congress, it’s as simple as that.”

It’s true, you did “vote” to repeal Obamacare, but Obamacare has not been repealed nor has it been defunded.

Additionally, Obama is closer than ever to getting his executive actions on amnesty up and running. You played a part in helping him achieve this goal when you separated the funding of the Department of Homeland Security from the issue of the executive order on amnesty.

Once again, you caved on DHS funding and this in turn gave the Democrats a long-term DHS funding bill with no immigration provisions, just like when you voted for “Cromnibus.”

If it weren’t for the court currently ordering a stay, Obama’s executive order on immigration would be in full-swing right now. Thankfully, we still have a functioning court for the most part, that can be utilized to uphold the Constitutional principles, at least for now.

You are not a leader, John! You are a “caver” and a pawn for the Democratic Party. Your comrades in politics have vowed to protect you from the “big bad” Republican Tea Party who also want to write you a “Dear John” letter but don’t have the votes to do it.

Know this, John: You will go down in political history as the Republican who helped the progressive left achieve their goals while assisting in causing the Republican Party to fail to fulfill its goals. In addition, you will be responsible for the loss of Republican Party members due to those having had enough of your apparent change of heart to represent your own party.

A principled and moral House Speaker would take the high road and admit that he no longer represents the Republican Party ideologies. He would then stepdown and turn over the position to someone who does. If you choose not to stepdown, which is most likely what you will do, then you must take the onus, along with Obama for “fundamentally transforming” this country to a place that Republican constituents do not support.

It seems that the philosophy to which you once aspired in 2013, may no longer hold any significance to you. A plaque on your desk then with words written in Latin, “Don’t let the bastards grind you down,” may be very telling as to what changed a man who came from humble beginnings and once lived a seemingly down-to-earth and blue collar life.

In closing, John, many people of the United States feel as I do and will join with me in no longer supporting the Republican Party financially or otherwise, until you have resigned as Speaker of the House. You have forgotten who you were elected to serve and conservatives have had enough.


We the People of the United States of America

Read more at http://threepercenternation.com/2015/03/dear-john-boehner-conservatives-are-breaking-up-with-you/

RIP OFF: Obama’s Amnesty Will Give Illegals $1.3 TRILLION in Free ‘Benefits’ Over Lifetime (AMERICA, YOU HAVE TO THANK THOSE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS FOR THIS.)*

Screen Shot 2015-03-18 at 3.03.00 PM

A new study shows that Obama’s amnesty will cost we the taxpayer $1.3 TRILLION for the free benefits his policy will give to illegals over their lifetime.


Here we have a budget that is already overspent, we have a president,Obama, who has created more debt than every single other president combined, and now he wants to make us spend $1.3 trillion more on his freebies to lawbreaking illegals? Isn’t that wonderful?

…if 3.97 million illegal immigrant parents earn legal protection, as Rector estimates, they will earn about $1.3 trillion in Social Security and Medicare payments over their lifetime, he says.

They also immediately are eligible for two cash welfare programs: the earned income tax credit and the additional child tax credit, and can retroactively apply for those benefits for the last three years. Together, Rector reports, the two tax credits can provide up to $7,460 in cash benefits each year for a lower-income family with two children.

Rector calculates the $7.8 billion in total tax credit cash payments to DAPA recipients per year is greater than what newly “on the books” working immigrant parents would pay in taxes.

It’s all just another part of Obama’s plan to destroy America.

Obama Takes in a Record $1,185,613,000,000 in Taxes–But STILL Running a $386B Deficit (HOW DO YOU THINK HE PAYS FOR THE FERGUSON THUGS AND THE OBAMAPHONES?)*

Screen Shot 2015-03-14 at 12.06.15 PM

Obama has taken a record amount of taxes from us in the last year. Yet he is still running the largest spending deficit in history, too

This out of control government spending is destroying us all.

Inflation-adjusted federal tax revenues hit a record $1,185,613,000,000 in the first five months of fiscal 2015, but the federal government still ran a $386,537,000,000 deficit during that time, according to the latest Monthly Treasury Statement.

Each month, the Treasury publishes the government’s “total receipts,” including all revenue from individual income taxes, corporate income taxes, social insurance and retirement taxes (including Social Security and Medicare taxes), unemployment insurance taxes, excise taxes, estate and gift taxes, customs duties, and “miscellaneous receipts.”

In constant 2015 dollars, the $1,185,613,000,000 that the federal government collected from October through February in fiscal 2015 was $94,803,620,000 more than the $1,090,809,380,000 it collected in October through February in fiscal 2014.

That $1,090,809,380 that the federal government brought in in October through February of fiscal 2015 is now the second-highest-ever federal tax intake through February.

I sure wish I could keep spending billions more than I take in. How about you?


Screen Shot 2015-03-11 at 11.41.26 AMUnder President Obama’s rule, illegal immigrants will be eligible for social security payments

Executive Editor

His reporting has received wide coverage, including in the pages of The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and The Drudge Report, among others. Vince has appeared as a guest on the Fox News Channel, CNN and CNBC, as well as other cable news networks. Additionally, Vince has been a guest on “The Sean Hannity Radio Show,” Sirius XM”s “The Press Pool with Julie Mason,” “The Schnitt Show” and Glenn Beck’s TheBlaze TV.

Prior to joining TheDC, Vince was the Web Editor for CarolinaCoastOnline.com, and a radio talk show host for The Talk Station (WTKF/WJNC) in Morehead City, N.C.
Under President Obama’s rule, illegal immigrants will be eligible for Social Security payments — and they’ll be credited for the time they’ve been working illegally, in some cases.

Obama’s executive actions — according to a Congressional Research Service memo sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee and obtained by The Daily Caller — will permit illegals who qualify for the president’s program to earn Social Security payments.

“Under the November 20, 2014, policy memorandum, foreign nationals who receive deferred action status may be eligible for work authorization,” the CRS memo states. “As a result, a foreign national who receives deferred action status may be able to have all of his or her Social Security-covered earnings count toward qualifying for a Social Security benefit (all earnings from authorized and unauthorized work).”

Therefore, illegal immigrants who have previously paid into the Social Security system — while using a fraudulent Social Security number, for instance — will be eligible for benefits derived from that system. Those benefits include retirement, disability and survivor payments.

The CRS admits that some immigrants could have trouble proving that they were using a specific, fake Social Security number while working illegally.
“[I]t is unclear how easy it will be for a foreign national to prove that earnings credited to a Social Security number that was not issued to the foreign national (i.e., credits earned while the person was working without authorization) belong on his or her earnings record,” the memo states.

Illegal immigrants covered by Obama’s executive actions are receiving new social security numbers.

A GOP aide who provided the memo to TheDC says that “the executive amnesty onion has just started being peeled.”

“These benefits programs are in dire trouble,” the aide said, “and they need to be preserved for legal immigrants and American citizens first and foremost.”

In its pitches for public buy-in, the White House has given conflicting stories about whether illegals will be eligible for Social Security payments.

When Obama announced his executive action back in November 2014, a White House official claimed that affected illegal immigrants wouldn’t be eligible for Social Security payments.

But by December, the White House had reversed course, claiming that the official misspoke.

Read the memo:

<p style=” margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block;”> <a title=”View CRS SSDI Memo on Scribd” href=”http://www.scribd.com/doc/258293222&#8243; style=”text-decoration: underline;” >CRS SSDI Memo</a></p>https://www.scribd.com/embeds/258293222/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=true


Screen Shot 2015-03-10 at 3.47.54 PM


U.S. Attorneys declined to prosecute illegal aliens accused of using the social security numbers of dead people in order to work.

That finding is contained in a footnote in a recent audit released by the Social Security Administration’s office of the inspector general.

“In three cases, [the Social Security Administration’s Office of Investigators] confirmed that illegal aliens were using deceased numberholders’ names and SSNs to work,” the footnote reads. “But U.S. Attorneys in Arizona, Florida, and South Carolina declined prosecution.”

The fraudulent use of a social security number is a federal felony. The same is true for illegal aliens applying for work in the U.S.

Overall, the audit found over 6.5 million social security numbers for people over the age of 112 with no death records listed in a database called the Numident. Administration files were clearly not being updated properly, the inspector general determined, as it is believed that only a few hundred people 112 years or older are still alive in the U.S.
Some of the numbers were fraudulently used to open bank accounts, the audit found. Others were used by illegal immigrants seeking work.

Between 2008 and 2011, “employers made 4,024 E-Verify inquiries using 3,873 SSNs belonging to numberholders born before June 16, 1901,” the inspector general reported.

E-Verify is the system the Department of Homeland Security uses to ensure that immigrants are allowed to work legally in the U.S.

“These inquiries indicate individuals’ attempts to use the SSNs to apply for work,” the report reads.

The audit found that 34 deceased individuals’ numbers were being misused by individuals for work purposes.

And of those cases of fraudulent use mentioned in the audit, U.S. Attorneys, for some unknown reason, declined to press charges.

The report cited cases in South Carolina and Arizona.

One numberholder born in 1896 filed a “life claim” in 1958, at the age of 62. There were no earnings records for that numberholder from 1963 through 2006. But in 2007 and following years, an employer in South Carolina reporting paying wages ranging from $11,450 to $27,694 to someone using that number.

The case in Arizona was similar. A numberholder born in 1886 filed a “life claim” in 1953. No earnings were reported on that number from between 1956 and 2007. But between 2008 and 2012, an Arizona employer reported paying between $12,594 and $17,100 to whomever was using the number.


Screen Shot 2015-03-07 at 4.14.28 PM

“I believe that the right and obligation to work is shared by everyone in this country, regardless of how they came here,” she said


President Barack Obama’s nominee for Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, believes illegal aliens have the “right to work” in America, violating multiple federal crimes in the process.


President Barack Obama’s nominee for Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, believes illegal aliens have the “right to work” in America, violating multiple federal crimes in the process. 

The revelation came during her first day of confirmation hearings Wednesday on Capitol Hill. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) asked Lynch about her position on enforcing America’s immigration laws:  

Sessions: The president’s action would give people who came here unlawfully the right to work, participate in social security and medicare, when Congress has not done that, allows them to stay for at least a period lawfully. Let me ask you, in the workplace of America today when we have a high number of unemployed, we have had declining wages for many years, the lowest percentage of Americans working, who has more right to a job in this country? A lawful immigrant who is here — a green card holder — or a citizen, or someone who came here illegally. 

Lynch: Senator, I believe that the right and obligation to work is shared by everyone in this country, regardless of how they came here. When one is here, regardless of status, I would prefer they be participating in the workplace than not be.

On his YouTube page, Sen. Sessions extrapolates on the issue and his concern over the position held by the nominee to be the nation’s top law enforcement officer and the President’s actions with regard to providing legal amnesty to those who have crossed the borders and stayed in America in violation of federal law:  

In addition to suspending enforcement for nearly all of the 12 million individuals unlawfully present in the United States, President Obama issued an executive decree on November 20th, 2014, extending work permits, Social Security, Medicare, tax credits, and government identification to 5 million illegal immigrants and illegal visa violators. This would allow illegal immigrants to take any job in America, regardless of chronic high unemployment for Americans—including a 10.4 percent unemployment rate for African-American workers. Peter Kirsanow, a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, explained—contra AG Holder’s “breathtaking” contention that amnesty was a civil right—that unlawful amnesty for illegal immigrants violated the rights of U.S. citizens to the full protection of their laws, including those laws passed by Congress to protect their jobs and wages from illegal competition. The President’s executive edict (an edict he said previously only an Emperor would deign to issue) voids Americans’ legal protections in law, supplanting them with a new executive policy that Congress and voters have rejected, a policy which forces unemployed Americans to compete against a large and growing illegal workforce.

Following the confirmation hearing, Sessions released a statement saying he could not support Lynch’s nomination and would vote “no” onher confirmation due to her position on illegal immigration.  “Unfortunately, when asked today whether she found the president’s actions to be ‘legal and constitutional,’ Ms. Lynch said that she did,” Sessions said. “I therefore am unable to support her nomination.”

‘COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR THE RULE OF LAW’ Obama’s Lawyers Deceived A Court On Amnesty Handouts


Screen Shot 2015-02-18 at 11.49.19 AM


White House Correspondent

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking a judge to allow an investigation of the closed-door workings of President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty, following the discovery that 100,000 illegal immigrants had secretly been given three-year amnesty documents well before a promised start date.

“The Obama Administration appears to have already been issuing expanded work permits, in direct contradiction to what they told a federal judge previously in this litigation,” Paxton said in a Thursday statement describing his legal request, which was signed by the governors or attorneys general of 26 states.

“The circumstances behind this must be investigated, and the motion we seek would help us determine to what extent the Administration might have misrepresented the facts in this case,” he added.

The judge has frozen Obama’s amnesty since Feb. 16, pending the future decisions of appeals court judges. Without the judge’s decision, Obama’s deputies already would be preparing work permits and tax rebates for illegals.

Paxton’s hardball response was cheered by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. ”I commend Attorney General Paxton for continuing to hold the Obama Administration accountable, and I’m confident an investigation would find the Administration knowingly or recklessly misled a Federal Court in issuing thousands of amnesty documents illegally,” he said Thursday.

“President Obama has continued to show complete disregard for the Rule of Law by acting beyond his Constitutional authority at every stage of this process,” he added.

The judge, Andrew Hanen, showed his skepticism about the administration in a 2014 case, when he said border officers were being used by the administration to illegally transfer foreign children from Central America to their parents living illegally in U.S. cities.

On Feb. 16, Hanen froze Obama’s two-part amnesty, which was intended to provide residency, work permits and tax rebates to at least four million illegals, after concluding it likely violated the federal government’s rule-making process.

The amnesty for roughly 1 million younger illegals is called the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, and it was launched in June 2012, five months before the 2012 election. Obama’s November amnesty extends the work permits given to the younger illegals from two years to three years.

The amnesty for roughly 4 million parent illegals is called DAPA, or Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents. Obama’s plan would give them work permits, tax rebates, Social Security numbers, drivers’ license and a fast-track to citizenship.

In November, administration statements had declared it would not start the DACA upgrade until Feb. 18, and would not start the DAPA amnesty until in May 2015. On Jan. 15, Obama’s lawyer told the judge that “no applications for the revised DACA … would be accepted until the 18th of February.”

But Obama’s deputies were already handing out the three-year DACA amnesties. By mid-February, 100,000 three-year amnesties had been given to illegals who had received two-year amnesties in 2012 or 2013.

On March 3, Obama’s lawyers admitted to the judge that officials had already given the three-year DACA amnesties to 100,000 people, according to a March 4 article in the Washington Examiner.

“Out of an abundance of caution, however, Defendants wish to bring one issue to the Court’s attention,” said the administration’s document given to the judge. “Between November 24, 2014 and the issuance of the Court’s [Feb. 16] Order, USCIS granted three-year periods of deferred action to approximately 100,000 individuals who had requested deferred action under the original 2012 DACA guidelines.”

The officials excused the deception by claiming that the announced Feb. 18 start date “may have led to confusion about when USCIS had begun providing three-year terms of deferred action to individuals already eligible for deferred action under 2012 DACA.”

The administration’s “confusion” was exposed March 3, the same day that top GOP leaders allied with Democrats to pressure GOP legislators to pass a budget bill for the Department of Homeland Security. The budget did pass, and it doesn’t block funding for Obama’s unpopular and possibly illegal amnesty.