Militants fighting for the Islamic State in Iraq have released gruesome new images of alleged thieves having their hands hacked off in front of crowds bloodthirsty onlookers.
The photographs were taken in ISIS stronghold Mosul and show in gruesome detail how the terrorists pump their victims full of drugs before using a massive meat cleaver to cut off the hands.
Hundreds of people are seen lining the streets of the oil-rich city to get a better view of the barbaric act, which is carried out by several masked militants led by a white-bearded elderly man named Abu Ansar al-Ansari, who appears to be orchestrating proceedings.
Depraved: One elderly militant known as Abu Ansar al-Ansari does not cover his thick white beard as he oversees the alleged thief’s hand being hacked off from his arm
Preparation: The photographs were taken in ISIS stronghold Mosul and show in gruesome detail how the terrorists pump their victims full of drugs before using a massive meat cleaver to cut off the hands
Hundreds of people are seen lining the streets of the oil-rich city to get a better view of the barbaric act
Photographs of the horrific punishments are being shared by pro-ISIS social media users, who use the Arabic file sharing website Nasher to exchange images of the terror group’s latest atrocities.
The images begin by showing charge sheets carrying ISIS’ chilling black and white logo which accuse the prisoners of stealing.
Crowds of men are then shown lining the streets to witness the savage punishments, with young boys clambering on to their father’s shoulders in order to get a better view.
Keeping the baying crowd in line are dozens of heavily armed militants, who wear military fatigues as they stand facing the onlookers in an intimidating fashion.
The next shots showing in gruesome detail the medical preparation for the sickening amputations. The men’s arms are pumped full of drugs and wrapped in tight bandages both to lessen the agony of the sickening act and to reduce the amount of blood flowing from the open wound.
Getting ready: The men’s arms are pumped full of drugs and wrapped in tight bandages both to lessen the agony of the sickening act and to reduce the amount of blood flowing from the open wound
Grim: The photographs of the horrific punishments are being shared by pro-ISIS social media users, who use the Arabic file sharing website Nasher to exchange images of the terror group’s latest atrocities
Sick: Images of the actual amputation itself show militants crowding around the victim, while ropes are used to pull his arm taut and allow the cleaver-wielding jihads and clean strike
Bloodthristy: Crowds of men are shown lining the streets to witness the savage punishments, with young boys clambering on to their father’s shoulders in order to get a better view
Images of the actual amputation itself show militants crowding around the victim, while ropes are used to pull his arm taut and allow the cleaver-wielding jihads and clean strike.
While most of those involved cover their faces, one elderly militant known as Abu Ansar al-Ansari does not cover his thick white beard as he oversees the entire atrocity.
The distinctive fighter has become notorious in recent months after appearing in numerous videos released by ISIS showing their barbaric acts.
After having his hand hacked off, the victim is seen receiving medical treatment to ensure the wound does not become infected.
His arm is wrapped in thick bandages and more anaesthetising drugs are seen being pumped into his body to numb the pain before he is driven away from the crowds in the back of a van.
Agony: After having his hand hacked off, the victim is seen receiving medical treatment to ensure the wound does not become infected
The photographs show in gruesome detail the medical preparation for the sickening amputations
A man is seen recuperating after having his right arm hacked off by militants from the Islamic State
Taken away: The man’s arm is wrapped in thick bandages and more anaesthetising drugs are seen being pumped into his body to numb the pain before he is driven away from the crowds in the back of a van
The images emerged just days after similar photographs taken in the terror group’s de facto capital Raqqa showed a terrified young man being dragged into a public square to have his hand cut off.
The blindfolded victim was forced to sit in a chair in the centre of the square, where he was held in place by one of the jihadis, while two others use a cleaver to brutally sever his hand from his arm.
The horrific images were shared on the Twitter page of the local activist group Raqqa Is Being Slaughtered Silently, who work undercover in the city to expose the atrocities committed by ISIS.
The four photographs are high quality shots and carry the distinctive yellow branding of ISIS’ Al-Hayat Media Center, suggesting they may be stills from an as-yet unreleased propaganda video.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2982400/Pumped-drugs-arm-tightly-bandaged-reduce-blood-flow-thief-maimed-ISIS-photographs-revealing-criminals-medically-prepared-sickening-amputation.html#ixzz3TcrNRRJq
State Dept., Saudis create turmoil in Middle East
The Obama administration was complicit in Clinton’s use of private, unsecured e-mail in exchanges with the White House.
“The email quotes an ‘individual with sensitive access’ stating information provided by French security services indicated the funding for both the Benghazi and Algeria attacks ‘originated with wealthy Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia,’” Aaron Klein of WND reported. “Continued the purported email: ‘During July and August 2012, these financiers provided funds to AQIM contacts in Southern Europe, who in turn passed the money onto AQIM operatives in Mauritania.’”
THIS is why feds want to take over the Internet!
by KIT DANIELS | INFOWARS.COM | MARCH 5, 2015
Alternative media pioneer Matt Drudge and health activist Vani Hari, aka The Food Babe, are far more influential than President Obama, according to Time.com poll respondents.
The poll appears at the end of an article listing Time’s picks for the 30 most influential people on the Internet, and at the time of this writing Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report commands the lead with 29%, the Food Babe has second at 27% and President Obama comes in a distant third with only 6%.
“…The rise of [on-line] social networks has leveled the playing field, allowing unknowns to command audiences rivaling those of real-world leaders, even if by accident,” Time reported.
And that’s what’s motivating the federal government to take control of the Internet through the FCC, especially as the U.S. mainstream media, which routinely promotes the government’s and the GMO industry’s agendas, continues its steep decline in popularity.
“Mainstream media executives appear to be optimistic they can reverse these declines at some point, but they simply don’t realize there has been a fundamental paradigm shift when it comes to the news media in the U.S.,” social commentator Michael Snyder wrote. “The general population has lost a tremendous amount of faith in the mainstream media.”
“They are increasingly becoming aware it is deeply controlled by the establishment.”
The establishment, a vast network of the world’s most influential politicians, media moguls and industry titans, uses mass media to control public opinion and have been doing so since at least the 1920s with propaganda techniques developed during World War I.
The establishment believes that only the elite have the intellect and rationality to decide the public’s best interests. To them, the public is simply too dumb to manage their own affairs and therefore must be led like cattle towards the future world envisioned by those in control.
They want the public to be mere spectators in society, only participating on occasion during political elections to decide which one of the elites will “represent” them.
The establishment’s mass media propaganda program to “manufacture” public consent for their various agendas culminated with the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird late last century, and now the mainstream media is predominantly owned by six corporations with close ties to the government.
“Just a handful of global news corporations can, in one day, make billions of people around the world simultaneously aware of something that was completely unknown the day before,” Joseph Plummer wrote in Tragedy & Hope 101. “With this kind of power, the Network [the establishment] can choose to spread any lie, or withhold any truth, that it chooses.”
“At the end of the day, if people aren’t looking beyond the Network’s instruments for their information, they cannot expect to know what the Network doesn’t want them to know.”
Unlimited government requires the population be kept disorganized and distracted through purposeful deception, but independent media championed by Matt Drudge and on-line activism spearheaded by the Food Babe stands in the way.
“Dogmatic adherence to mealtimes is anti-science, racist…”
by MIKAEL THALEN MARCH 5, 2015
An article featured in the left-leaning news outlet Mother Jones this week declares the act of eating three meals a day to be racist.
In a piece entitled, “Why You Should Stop Eating Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner,” writer Kiera Butler asserts that strict adherence to mealtimes is not only “anti-science,” but “racist” as well.
“When European settlers got to America, they also imported their meal habits,” Butler says. “They observed that the eating schedule of the native tribes was less rigid—the volume and timing of their eating varied with the seasons.”
“Sometimes, when food was scarce, they fasted. The Europeans took this as ‘evidence that natives were uncivilized…’ So fascinated were Europeans with tribes’ eating patterns… that they actually watched Native Americans eat ‘as a form of entertainment.’”
Butler’s article goes on to chronicle the rising prevalence of meal schedules and their dominance in modern Western culture, insinuating that the tradition’s white European roots make the very practice inherently racist.
“Dogmatic adherence to mealtimes is anti-science, racist, and might actually be making you sick,” Butler writes.
While such absurd claims are often praised by hoards of “social justice warriors” scouring the depths of the Internet, commenters of the article were quick to reject the daft declaration.
“Add ‘eating’ to the list of ‘everything is racist…’” the article’s top comment states.
“I never realized that oatmeal was racist. I feel so ashamed!” another joked.
The obsession by some to label everything as racist is so pervasive that focusing merely on the topic of food can yield countless similar stories.
Last June online publication Slate argued that getting food poisoning after visiting an “ethnic restaurant” was racist and most likely being made up by the victim.
“Do you think an ethnic restaurant caused your food poisoning? You might be a little bit racist,” the article said.
An all-you-can-eat taco bar fundraiser hosted by a college sorority was also deemed racist and offensive last year due to the food’s association with Mexico.
Obama supporters speaking with media analyst Mark Dice last May stated that not liking Mexican food was a sign of racism as well.
Portland school officials labeled peanut butter and jelly sandwiches racist in November 2013, arguing that the meal represented white culture.
“What about Somali or Hispanic students, who might not eat sandwiches?” Verenice Gutierrez, principal of Harvey Scott K-8 School in Portland, said at the time.
In fact, according to the City of Seattle, even brown paper bags used to carry lunches are racist due to the brown coloring’s alleged tie to African Americans.