*(AGAIN?)* – EXCLUSIVE: Vicente Fox Stresses Mexico Won’t Pay for That ‘F**king Wall’

Published on Aug 31, 2016

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox says Donald Trump’s speech and trip shows voters his ignorance towards the country and its people. In an exclusive interview with Fusion’s Jorge Ramos, Fox said Trump took over the press conference saying he came to play a game and use Pena Nieto for his own gain.

Toussaints' Wrath

Were are the Mexicans All I see is Europeans on their news networks and government positions. It’s genocide.
SedonaHealthCoach

Vicente Fox looks a lot like Saddam Hussein. Must be the mustache!
eric131313

Well Us is paying for your fucking immigrants so take responsibility for once
Peator

He should be working as garbage man or toilet cleaner
vidkidxyz

So… an interview between Mexican Drug Cartel Lords… interesting.   Meanwhile Hillary rejected the invitation to Mexico and did not go due to her poor health.
vidkidxyz

Hey ! My friend… We in America are happy to welcome as many LEGAL Mexican Immigrants as want to come here LEGALLY… they are good and hard working people.  BUT, both Mexico and the US have a problem with uncontrolled borders and we both know it.  This situation must be resolved… and US Presidents sitting down with Mexican Presidents and working together to solve it sounds like a good idea for everyone involved.  As for Hillary… she turned down the invitation and did not go.  I guess she was either too sick or maybe Presidente Nieto has not yet made a big enough donation to the Clinton Foundation to merit a visit ?

State Dept 30 Newly Revealed Clinton Emails Could Deal With Benghazi Attack

Published on Aug 31, 2016

State Dept 30 Newly Revealed Clinton Emails Could Deal With Benghazi Attack

david pollitt

LOOK AT BRAZIL…EMPEACHMENT ON ALMOST NOTHING…YET THE GRINGOS…THE STUPID USA….LET THIS BITCH GO TIME AFTER TIME…..WHAT A RIDICULOUS COUNTRY
robert mcvay

Hillary is crookeder than a dog’s hind leg and lower than a snake’s belly..
marie55

Wow!! Hillary needs to step down from this presidential race, right now! It is over for her…good always wins over evil in the end, and Hillary is very corrupt and evil!
beebee

This is nothing just wait until the next set of emails. Theres only gonna be 3 of them but they’re presense on her server are a direct link to American marines being killed in Iraq. Because of her server having these particular emails allowed al-queda to know just where to strike them.

Obama Knows Damn Well What Rigged Election Is

securitygates4u.co.uk

But..but..but they kept telling us that the election couldn’t be rigged! At this time, what does it matter!!!! DONALD TRUMP WILL BE THE 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. HE WILL WIN BY A HISTORICAL LANDSLIDE VICTORY NEVER SEEN BEFORE.
Smokey The CareBear

Simple answer. He’s a liar. He himself is another man’s lie.  idiot puppett
Gregor the Great Madigan

looking sharp my brother. keep up the great work against the globalist!

New Map Shows Exactly How Many Syrian Refugees Obama Placed in Each State

New Map Shows Exactly How Many Syrian Refugees Obama Placed in Each State – Justin Holcomb

BY JUSTIN HOLCOMB

Earlier this year, Barack Obama made a promise that he would resettle 10,000 Syrian refugees throughout the United States.  This will most certainly come to fruition by the end of the week.

 A new analysis of the Syrian refugee  program shows that while some states received as many as 870 refugees,  states like Alabama and Mississippi received none.

“More than 7,500 refugees fleeing the conflict in Syria have been admitted to the United States since Oct. 1,” explains Roll Call, “more than four times the number in all of fiscal 2015. Syria is now the third most common country of origin for refugees.”

States like California, Arizona, Texas, and Michigan all received in excess of 500 refugees.  Along with Alabama and Mississippi, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Arkansas, Delaware, and Vermont all received none.

As the map indicates, Obama made a late push this summer and nearly tripled his monthly average closing out his presidency with a bang.

Kaepernick says Hillary should be in prison, media CUTS anti-Clinton plea out of coverage!

BY NICOLE HAAS

“I mean we have a presidential candidate who’s deleted emails, and done things illegally,” Kaepernick told the press. “That doesn’t make sense to me. If it was any other person, you’d be in prison. So… what is this country really standing for?”

Huh, most of haven’t heard that. Not that it would change any true Patriot’s mind about him sitting out the national anthem, but it might get a few on the Left to thinking.

Stuart Varney and Herman Cain took on the bias head on.

BREAKING!!! Media PRETZELED Kaepernick story..He was partially making an ANTI Hillary Clinton plea #MotivationMonday pic.twitter.com/mpM9arL6lg

— TRUMPCAT (@Darren32895836) August 29, 2016

Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/08/30/kaepernick-says-hillary-prison-media-cuts-anti-clinton-plea-coverage-385003#ixzz4IwbUHYhx

 

 

The Unfolding Clinton Foundation Fiasco

The Clinton Foundation has become a serious problem for the Hillary Clinton campaign. Everyone knows the Clintons made a mockery of the promises they made to Team Obama. Even the left-wing site PolitiFact says that it’s “Mostly False” that they obeyed the rules.

Like her husband, Bill Clinton, who infamously claimed, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman,” Monica Lewinsky, Hillary Clinton is going around claiming, “My work as secretary of state was not influenced by outside sources.”

On Jan. 5, 2009, Clinton sent a letter to State Department Designated Agency Ethics Official James Thessin promising, “I will not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter that has a direct and predictable effect on my financial interests or those of any person whose interests are imputed to me,” including her husband.

Who didn’t anticipate that this would end up in an ethical mess? What genius hasn’t observed over the last 25 years how the Clintons break their promises? Some people saw this as a potential scandal, but they didn’t stand a chance with the Clinton-loving press.

In Oct. 2007, liberal pundit Matthew Yglesias asked in the Los Angeles Times, “Who’s giving money to Bill Clinton?” He complained that the Clintons should release a list of their foundation donors before Hillary Clinton could become president in 2009, saying: “Disclosing who’s contributing to Bill Clinton’s foundation after his wife wins the election would be about four years too late. The voters ought to have this information before the election, when it could still make a difference.”

Surprise, surprise: Clinton didn’t win, and the Clintons didn’t release a donor list until Dec. 2008, when she was asked to become secretary of state. The blather on the TV networks was all about how President Obama’s cabinet was a team of geniuses. “We have not seen this kind of combination of star power, brain power and political muscle this early in a cabinet in our lifetimes,” gushed George Stephanopoulos on ABC. The fix was in.

As Clinton’s four years wound down, the pundits celebrated the wonderful work of the Clinton Foundation. On “The Chris Matthews Show” on July 16, 2012, journalist Howard Fineman said that Bill Clinton had modeled his foundation on President Jimmy Carter, but that “he’s Jimmy Carter with a better touch.” Chris Matthews replied: “And much bigger in terms of the amplification of what he’s been able to do. The Clinton Global Initiative is huge. And by the way it’s done a lot to build his role in history…beyond anything he was able to do as president.”

On Aug. 23, the Associated Press underlined the degree to which Hillary Clinton’s promises were vaporized. More than half the people outside the government (at least 85 of 154 people) who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton during the first half of her “public service” at the State Department donated to the family foundation. At least 40 donated more than $100,000, and 20 contributed more than $1 million.

The AP based these investigations off half of Clinton’s office calendars from her State Department tenure, which it only received after filing a Freedom of Information Act request to acquire them. The other half of the calendars won’t be released until after the election. 

Once again, the Clintons are making promises to downsize their involvement with the foundation if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency. At this point, that sounds as believable as former Rep. Anthony Weiner’s promise to stop texting. But the Clinton-enabling reflex in the media is dangerously strong, and the Clintons are threatening to take advantage of it for the rest of this campaign.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Brent Bozell III and Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at http://www.creators.com.

Pelosi Docs Show Dems Trying Hard To Cast Benghazi As A ‘Conspiracy Theory’

Capture

BY SAAGAR ENJETI

New documents released from Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi’s computer by purported hacker Guccifer 2.0, reveal democratic talking points to counter Republican Benghazi attacks.

The document casts the controversy surrounding Benghazi as “Legitimate outrage over the deaths of American diplomats mixed with partisanship.” The document also admits that then Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice “gave incorrect information on television” in the immediate aftermath of the attack.

The document’s central talking points revolve around ignoring the facts revealed by congressional investigations, and instead on rhetorical flourishes that emphasize patriotism.

The first talking point focuses solely on the importance of having diplomats in dangerous places, and makes no mention of the specific circumstances of Benghazi.

This tragedy highlights the challenges our diplomats face when they serve as frontline civilians, representing our nation in harm’s way. Isolating America and sequestering these professionals in fortress embassies is not a solution. We must value and support their important work, as well as protecting their physical security.

The second talking point paints any attempt at calling for accountability as “pandering to conspiracy theorists.”

Benghazi is a tragedy, not a scandal. At this point, most public discussion is pandering to conspiracy theorists or harping on the death of an American ambassador to score political points.

The third talking point denigrates the Republican led congress for investigating the specific circumstances involving the events of Benghazi. The talking point also calls for respecting the families of the fallen in Benghazi, in lieu of actually discussing what happened.

These tragic events have been investigated more than the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Reports ordered by a Republican-led Congress have repeatedly debunked conspiracy theories of criminal negligence or cover-ups, and media coverage has exhausted the issue from every angle. Even incoming House Speaker McCarthy admitted the investigations were more about hurting Hillary Clinton than finding truth. We should remember the sacrifice of these Americans, not reduce their names to political talking points.

The final talking point revolves around attacking investigators of the events of Benghazi. The talking point asks recipients to focus on the voting records of rival congressman, rather than discuss the events of Benghazi.

Some of those most determined to keep this story in the news cycle have a history of hypocritical votes against funding diplomacy and development, the very work these Americans died for.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/31/pelosi-docs-shows-dems-trying-hard-to-cast-benghazi-as-a-conspiracy-theory/#ixzz4IwVTd1gx