President also suggested Trump has a “bromance” with Putin

Steve Watson | – OCTOBER 21, 2016

During a speech to Hillary Clinton supporters, at which Hillary was not present, President Obama declared that GOP nominee Donald Trump is ‘dangerous’ for talking about a rigged political system.

“This is just more than the usual standard lie,” Obama told the crowd, adding “That is not a joking matter.”

“That is dangerous, because when you try to sow the seeds of doubt in other people’s minds about the the legitimacy of our elections, that undermines our democracy.” the president exclaimed, adding that Trump is ‘helping our enemies’.

Obama also suggested that Trump has a “bromance” with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

“If you’ve made a career out of idealizing Ronald Reagan, then where were you when your own party’s nominee for president was kissing up to Vladimir Putin, the former KGB officer?” Obama said.

“You used to criticize me for even talking to the Russians. Now suddenly you’re ok with your nominee having a bromance.” Obama said.

“There’s only one way we lose this election: If we don’t turn out to vote,” the president said. “We’ve got to do it big; there has to be no doubt. Because the Donald is whining that the one is going to be rigged before the game is even over.”

“Of course, today he said, ‘It’s not rigged if I win,’ ” Obama said. “He doesn’t even worry if what he says is true. This is just him worrying about him losing.”

As Infowars and other alternative media outlets have extensively noted, Democrats, including Obama himself, don’t seem to have a problem with highlighting a “rigged system” when it politically suits them.



Hilary Clinton herself believes that the 2000 election was rigged. President Obama complained numerous times during his first campaign that the electoral process is wide open to corruption.

When it doesn’t suit them, it’s suddenly a ‘dangerous conspiracy theory’ undermining the fabric of democracy.

Here’s video of Obama, as well as several other Democrats, telling the same set of sheep supporters who cannot retain memories for longer than goldfish, that the system is “rigged”:

WikiLeaks releases yet more #PodestaEmails from Clinton campaign chair

The latest batch is the 14th release by WikiLeaks of Podesta’s mails. © Alex Wong / AFP

WikiLeaks has released a new batch of emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair John Podesta.

US Elections 2016

The latest tranche comprises of around 1,577 mails, bringing the total released so far to 25,000. WikiLeaks has said it will release around 50,000 mails in total in the lead up to the presidential election on November 8.

RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 14

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 21, 2016

The leak comes just a day after WikiLeaks revealed the first batch of emails involving an account Barack Obama was possibly using before winning the election in November 2008.

F**k these a**holes

When the New York Times ran an article about Clinton’s email server in July 2015, the campaign were not happy.

The campaign sent a letter to the Times executive editor voicing their “concerns” about the “inaccurate” article, which detailed federal inspectors’ request for a criminal inquiry into Clinton’s use of a private email server. The use of the word “criminal” was their biggest issue. The Times later removed the word, after making other corrections to the piece.

“It’s great,” Tanden said on July 30, “F**k these a**holes.”

“Love it!” Palmieri responded. “Thanks, Neera.”

Tanden then adds that although it “is probably very unhealthy,” she’s “going to war on this on twitter.”

In another email chain, which discusses the letter, between the Clinton campaign’s Director of Communications Jennifer Palmieri and press secretary Brian Fallon, the latter cites his primary worry.

“My only concern is stating the article inflicted damage on our campaign. Certainly true but I worry that if we leak the letter, it could be misinterpreted as us admitting the email controversy in general is hurting us,” he says.


Bernie’s proposal “sucks”

A January 2016 email from Podesta discusses Bernie Sanders’ healthcare plan. “His actual proposal sucks, but we live in a leftie alternative universe,” Podesta writes in an email to Judd Legum, editor at ThinkProgress.

Ruthless Podesta

Podesta is shown to take leaks seriously, threatening to fire a member of Clinton’s staff as an example to others, even if their hands are clean.

Following the discovery that a CNN source had insider knowledge of Clinton lining up an interview with NBC journalist Andrea Mitchell, Podesta says in a mail from March 2015, “I am happy to fire someone for leaking whether they did or they didn’t just to make the point.”

George Soros

Phone numbers for contacting controversial tycoon George Soros are apparently revealed. In an email from Sara Latham to Podesta three numbers are listed, described as “cell”, “home M-Friday” and “home weekends”.

Jeb the jerk

Jeb Bush is described as a “jerk” by Robby Mook, campaign manager for Clinton, in a mail to Podesta which discusses Clinton’s speech at a fundraiser in Colorado. The mail, dated August 4, 2015, is titled ‘Hitting Jeb tonight’.

VP criteria 

Clinton’s camp reveal their criteria for becoming a VP candidate in a mail where Paul Harstad from Democracy Alliance suggests to Podesta that Lt Governor of California Gary Newsom be selected for the role.

Harstad’s reasoning is that Newsom is “tall, very good looking, looks clean cut, and has a young attractive family.” His family’s financial struggles and working class background make him an ideal candidate, according to the mail.

“Importantly, I think he is young enough, attractive enough and progressive enough to attract Millennials and Bernie Sanders supporters,” he adds.


An email from Podesta titled ‘$’ in the late stages of Obama’s bid for the presidency in 2008 reveals that Louis Sussman donated $50,000 to his campaign. Sussman would go on to be confirmed in the Senate in July of the following year, days after he was announced as the new US ambassador to Britain.


Bill’s AIDS comments

Bill Clinton is criticized for a speech he made in December 2011 in which he said that the price of AIDS drugs should be lowered in the US.

Sent by Ira Magaziner, then-CEO of consultancy firm SJS advisors and CEO and vice chairman of the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), the mail says the comments could “seriously jeopardize our negotiations to continually lower prices in poor countries.”

Magaziner claims that CHAI are in the process of sending Clinton recommendations on how to proceed with the fight against AIDS, but that his comments preempted their counsel on a complicated matter.

“We have always told the drug companies that we would not pressure them and create a slippery slope where prices they negotiate with us for poor countries would inevitably lead to similar prices in rich countries” Magaziner says.

Amitabh Desai, director of foreign policy at the Clinton Foundation, says he will pass the concern onto Clinton.

Hugs for McCain

Obama’s 2008 campaign is revealed to be planning a prank on his Republican opponent John McCain. In a mail from March 2008 from consultant Paul Begala he suggests to Podesta’s team that they deploy a “guy in a Bush mask” to every John McCain event carrying a sign reading “John, Give Me a Hug!”, or he could shout “Hey, John, give me a hug!”

“The cost is minimal – how much does a rubber Bush mask cost?  All we’d need is a volunteer who would be willing to wear a blue suit, blue shirt, red tie – and a Bush mask,” Begala says, with ambition to eventually increase the prank to“a chorus of Bushes begging for hugs.”

Susan McCue, then-CEO of ONE, an advocacy campaign to reduce extreme global poverty, suggests that college Democrats would be willing to do the job.

Here’s Why Obama’s Provoking WAR with Russia Right Before Election

October 20, 2016 By

The Democrats have used their typical smoke-and-mirrors, fear-mongering tactics to distract Americans from the very real conflict boiling between the U.S. and Russia — which President Obama seems to be inciting in an effort to potentially influence the presidential election.

The Left has blamed the Russians for cyber hacking activities — such as the hack of the Democrat National Committee and the WikiLeaks dumps — with no concrete evidence provided to back the claims up.

In spite of this, there are reports that the Obama administration plans on retaliating against Russia via a cyber attack. Vice President Joe Biden confirmed these reports in an interview on Friday with Chuck Todd, host of “Meet the Press.”

In a Democrat National Committee email released over the summer by WikiLeaks, former DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz reprimanded Todd over biased coverage at NBC, and even bent over backwards to schedule a meeting with her to discuss it — further proof that the mainstream media operates as an arm of the Democrat party.

Todd parroted the left’s currently-baseless claim that Russia is to blame for recent cyber attacks as he asked Biden, “Why haven’t we sent a message yet to Putin?”

Biden replied,”We’re sending a message. We have the capacity to do it and it will be at the time of our choosing, and under the circumstances that will have the greatest impact.”

Todd asked Biden if the public would know when that message was sent and Biden said in response: “hope not.”

The U.K. Daily Mail reported the Russian response to Biden’s threat:

‘The threats directed against Moscow and our state’s leadership are unprecedented because they are voiced at the level of the US vice president.

‘To the backdrop of this aggressive, unpredictable line, we must take measures to protect (our) interests, to hedge risks,’ a Kremlin spokesman said, according to RIA Novosti news agency.

Between the threat of so-called “retaliatory” acts for Russian cyber attacks that the Obama administration has yet to provide proof of to the public, and the report from Reuters that Obama is considering “direct U.S. military action” in Syria, it’s clear how serious the threat of major conflict with Russia is.

The rest of the world is talking about this threat — particularly Russia, of course — but the U.S. media is largely silent about the threat of an impending massive conflict with Russia.

This is because the media is in the tank for Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton, who has made her intentions toward Russia abundantly clear on the campaign trail.

Obama is clearly inciting a conflict with Russia that would be extremely devastating. The globalists clearly want a war with Russia and Trump has repeatedly said that he wants to work with Russia and find a way to avoid it.

Many liberals voted for Obama because he laughably claimed to be a non-interventionist in the wake of former President Bush’s disastrous farce of a crusade to spread democracy and nation building that was a part of the move toward a new world order.

It’s absurd for these same liberals to vote for Clinton knowing that her policies could very well plunge us into World War III. It’s absurd for anyone who doesn’t want massive conflict with Russia and/or World War III to not vote for Donald Trump — our only chance to stop the dangerous globalist agenda.

H/T The Economic Collapse

Why is Hillary’s Podium LIT UP With what Appears to be an LED Screen?



Donald Trump won the final debate hands down.

Many are calling this his best debate to date.

He was calm, measured, confident, and he stayed on message.

Hillary, on the other hand, appeared drugged up, with glazed eyes and a goofy smile plastered on her face and frequent outbursts of inappropriate laughter. 

Many people online are questioning why Hillary’s podium is “lit up.”

This same thing occurred at the last debate – where she had what appeared to be an LED screen on her podium.

The images below show something illuminated on her podium, while Trump’s appears perfectly normal.

Is his more scamming and cheating from team Hillary?