Kaepernick says Hillary should be in prison, media CUTS anti-Clinton plea out of coverage!

BY NICOLE HAAS

“I mean we have a presidential candidate who’s deleted emails, and done things illegally,” Kaepernick told the press. “That doesn’t make sense to me. If it was any other person, you’d be in prison. So… what is this country really standing for?”

Huh, most of haven’t heard that. Not that it would change any true Patriot’s mind about him sitting out the national anthem, but it might get a few on the Left to thinking.

Stuart Varney and Herman Cain took on the bias head on.

BREAKING!!! Media PRETZELED Kaepernick story..He was partially making an ANTI Hillary Clinton plea #MotivationMonday pic.twitter.com/mpM9arL6lg

— TRUMPCAT (@Darren32895836) August 29, 2016

Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/08/30/kaepernick-says-hillary-prison-media-cuts-anti-clinton-plea-coverage-385003#ixzz4IwbUHYhx

 

 

The Unfolding Clinton Foundation Fiasco

The Clinton Foundation has become a serious problem for the Hillary Clinton campaign. Everyone knows the Clintons made a mockery of the promises they made to Team Obama. Even the left-wing site PolitiFact says that it’s “Mostly False” that they obeyed the rules.

Like her husband, Bill Clinton, who infamously claimed, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman,” Monica Lewinsky, Hillary Clinton is going around claiming, “My work as secretary of state was not influenced by outside sources.”

On Jan. 5, 2009, Clinton sent a letter to State Department Designated Agency Ethics Official James Thessin promising, “I will not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter that has a direct and predictable effect on my financial interests or those of any person whose interests are imputed to me,” including her husband.

Who didn’t anticipate that this would end up in an ethical mess? What genius hasn’t observed over the last 25 years how the Clintons break their promises? Some people saw this as a potential scandal, but they didn’t stand a chance with the Clinton-loving press.

In Oct. 2007, liberal pundit Matthew Yglesias asked in the Los Angeles Times, “Who’s giving money to Bill Clinton?” He complained that the Clintons should release a list of their foundation donors before Hillary Clinton could become president in 2009, saying: “Disclosing who’s contributing to Bill Clinton’s foundation after his wife wins the election would be about four years too late. The voters ought to have this information before the election, when it could still make a difference.”

Surprise, surprise: Clinton didn’t win, and the Clintons didn’t release a donor list until Dec. 2008, when she was asked to become secretary of state. The blather on the TV networks was all about how President Obama’s cabinet was a team of geniuses. “We have not seen this kind of combination of star power, brain power and political muscle this early in a cabinet in our lifetimes,” gushed George Stephanopoulos on ABC. The fix was in.

As Clinton’s four years wound down, the pundits celebrated the wonderful work of the Clinton Foundation. On “The Chris Matthews Show” on July 16, 2012, journalist Howard Fineman said that Bill Clinton had modeled his foundation on President Jimmy Carter, but that “he’s Jimmy Carter with a better touch.” Chris Matthews replied: “And much bigger in terms of the amplification of what he’s been able to do. The Clinton Global Initiative is huge. And by the way it’s done a lot to build his role in history…beyond anything he was able to do as president.”

On Aug. 23, the Associated Press underlined the degree to which Hillary Clinton’s promises were vaporized. More than half the people outside the government (at least 85 of 154 people) who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton during the first half of her “public service” at the State Department donated to the family foundation. At least 40 donated more than $100,000, and 20 contributed more than $1 million.

The AP based these investigations off half of Clinton’s office calendars from her State Department tenure, which it only received after filing a Freedom of Information Act request to acquire them. The other half of the calendars won’t be released until after the election. 

Once again, the Clintons are making promises to downsize their involvement with the foundation if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency. At this point, that sounds as believable as former Rep. Anthony Weiner’s promise to stop texting. But the Clinton-enabling reflex in the media is dangerously strong, and the Clintons are threatening to take advantage of it for the rest of this campaign.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Brent Bozell III and Tim Graham, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at http://www.creators.com.

FBI BOSS WARNS: ELECTION HACK THREAT ‘SERIOUS’

Published on Aug 31, 2016

The FBI has responded to recent concerns about U.S. voting systems being targeted for cyberattacks as Election Day approaches, saying the agency takes the threat “very, very seriously” and is working to “equip the rest of our government with options.”

The establishment is already trying to spin the narrative that any damaging revelations about Hillary Clinton that come in the form of an “October surprise,” including information about her ill health, will be the work of Russian disinformation agents working on behalf of Vladimir Putin.

Fun Fact

Trump 2016…From UK.
Path in AZ

Yup, all in a nice neat bow. If Clinton “wins”, no way anything was hacked, but if Trump “wins” (never gonna happen) then “the election was hacked by the Russians!”. Just covering their ass I think.
gangelone999

this explains why the news have been reporting the the russians are hacking our voting machines. Now , our wonderful government has to step in and control it. Wow, i wonder who will win?
logpile13

Obama was reelected under many layers of election fraud, he is a complex fraud
Tyler Hoeve

yea and we are just going to sit back and watch our country go down the drain.
Larry Nester

Trump needs to organize exit polling.
Just in time

The Russian government yeah right! I would take Putin over the democratic party any day! The federal government should not be allowed anywhere near a computer!

OBAMA LOVES THUGS: BHO Commutes Another ASTONISHING Amount Of INMATES Bringing The Total To …

Screen Shot 2016-08-31 at 11.26.33 AM

Strange priorities, that Obama. He’s happy to target political rivals with the IRS but beats his own record for prison releases.

The kicker? More than one-third of them were serving life sentences.

The new commutations bring his total to 325 in August alone, the most in a single month by any President in history.

Over eight years, Obama has shortened sentences for 673 inmates jailed for largely nonviolent drug offenses, more than the last ten Presidents combined.

He said: ‘We must remember that these are individuals — sons, daughters, parents, and in many cases, grandparents — who have taken steps toward rehabilitation and who have earned their second chance.
‘They are individuals who received unduly harsh sentences under outdated laws for committing largely nonviolent drug crimes.’
Dailymail
[These would include the ‘super-predators’ locked away under Bill Clinton’s legal reforms.]

Super-predators, as in THESE guys:

But the legislation’s supporters have encountered opposition from some Republicans who argue that changes could lead to an increase in crime and pose a greater danger to law enforcement.
Eggleston said Obama considered the individual merits of each application to determine that an applicant is ready to make use of their second chance.
DailyMail
We would note that this is the same Obama that considered the individual merits of releasing Gitmo inmates… the ones who went back to fighting their jihad.

Larry the Cable Guy: Hillary will be the end of the country

‘You’re always a racist, no matter what’

LARRY THE CABLE GUY: “So if you say, ‘You know, I kind of like Trump, I kind of like the things he says, you know, and I think I’m going to vote for Trump.’ You’re racist — and you’re always a racist, no matter what. As if they don’t agree with you, no matter what you say they throw that out like it’s, you know, and it’s so frustrating, but you know, Hillary will be the end of the country, that’s all I got to say.”

Related links

Chad Heinrich

He’s right. Civility has gone too far by the wayside.
Allie Fettig

Once Clinton gets those Supreme Court judges, then it’s truly game over.
Frank Lee

How to blow up a Liberals mind with 3 words.  “I like Trump”
snipercamtv

KILLARY 666 CAMP THINKS ALL USA PUBLIC ARE RETARDS ………………….TIME TO SHOW HER WHO IS BOSS….;-)
Gary Humphrey

He is right. If Hillary wins it will be through fraud. The people are not going to stand for it. Hillary wont back down. I think the country will be in ruins just like Syria and Venezuela in less than two years. This would be an act of War.
BEWTUBE

Trump for President of the United States all the way:)

HOLY COW! ABC News Reports EVEN MORE Problems For Queen Hillary!

When even ABC News is turning on the Queen, you KNOW there are problems.

I’m not sure which is the bigger story. That Clinton Foundation donors were getting special favors from Hillary’s State Department, or that ABC News is bothering to cover it. Regardless, please enjoy this latest installment of “Hillary Clinton Is A Corrupt Liar And Now Everybody Knows It” –

Selling spots at a luncheon for foreign dignitaries? Getting donors assigned seats next to Joe Biden at official government functions? All of this could be yours if you give hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Clinton Foundation!

Good grief – it’s like a terrible game show. And America always loses.

William Paul

Trump wins by a landslide.
hbo

This dishonesty is traitorous