US media dilute facts with false ‘Russian interference’ stories – top state election official

Screen Shot 2017-07-03 at 10.57.31 AM

The American media dilute the facts and fan conspiracy theories by spreading allegations that Russia interfered in the US presidential election, a senior state election official has said, adding the voting system is near-impossible to manipulate externally.


The media frenzy surrounding alleged “Russian meddling” in the 2016 US election suggests that reporters are often doctoring or neglecting hard facts for the sake of good storylines, Brian Kemp, Georgia’s secretary of state, argued in an opinion piece for USA Today.


“As reporters chase stories to feed the 24-hour news cycle, they dilute facts and develop false narratives about Russian hacking and potential vulnerabilities in the system,” he said. “The prevailing plot line is that states like Georgia can’t provide suitable security for elections.”

Kemp, who serves as the state’s chief election official in charge of voting procedures, said “non-partisan experts agree that manipulating a presidential election makes a good TV storyline but lacks real-world standing.”


The mainstream media pushing the Russia line in their coverage have simply no clue about safety measures installed to ensure protection of the election system, the official noted.

He described the state voting systems as “diverse, highly scrutinized and not connected to the internet.” Consequently, any computer network attacks on voter registration do not affect the vote count. “The thing that matters most – your vote – is secure,” Kemp stressed.

His dissenting opinion was voiced days after activists from investigative outlet Project Veritas released hidden camera footage showing a CNN producer who admitted that the media corporation’s anti-Russian coverage has much to do with “incredible ratings.”

“It’s mostly bullsh*t right now. Like, we don’t have any big giant proof,” John Bonifield, a CNN producer, said in the video. Asked why CNN is obsessed with Russia-related stories, Bonifield responded, “Because it’s ratings.”

“Our CIA is doing sh*t all the time, we’re out there trying to manipulate governments,” he said. “I think the president is probably right to say, like, ‘look, you are witch-hunting me,’” Bonifield said.


In his opinion piece, Kemp said “misinformation from the media or disgruntled partisans not only fuels conspiracy theorists but also erodes the first safeguard we have in our elections — the public’s trust.”

Inaccurate reporting is a disservice to the American people” as it fails to respect the electoral system’s reliability, the senior official added.

“To be candid, the most plausible and potentially effective attack on our elections is not by hacking the vote — it is through the manipulation of the American media machine,” he continued. These “baseless attacks and inaccurate stories enhance voter apathy and erode our confidence in the cornerstone of our democracy,” Kemp concluded.

Ongoing accusations that Russia played a role in US President Donald Trump’s campaign have plagued his presidency, along with allegations that the hack on the Democratic National Committee which leaked emails from Hillary Clinton’s staff was ordered directly by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Moscow has consistently dismissed the accusations as baseless. Earlier, speaking to renowned US filmmaker Oliver Stone, Putin said the US itself has a long record of interference in Russia’s domestic affairs.

“[They did it] in 2000, and in 2012, this always happened. But especially aggressively in 2012. I will not go into details,”Putin said, adding that all of the other post-Soviet countries have also been subject to US meddling. “They gathered opposition forces and financed them, went to opposition rallies,” the Russian leader said.

*(LORETTA REFUSED TO ANSWER 74 TIMES) – “You Refused to Answer 74 Times” Loretta Lynch Snaps Over Hillary Clinton’s Emails

Mysterious Lee

You’re a mean one, Mrs. Lynch You really are a heel, You’re as cuddly as a cactus, you’re as charming as an eel, Mrs. Lynch, You’re a bad banana with a greasy black peel!
bull frogger

What a stupid , tired old bitch . Put her fat ass in jail too .
garrett salter

I hope this bitch ends up in prison along with everyone like her.
maria levita

guess what you suck at you job Lynch, you go in circles not to answer questions…you suck,your corrupt..
Bella Bur

Her focus is protecting pedophiles.

She’s a lying piece of shit
fabian riquetti

I just wondering how she feels now that killary lost, she lost all that good credibility that she used to have, sold her soul to the devil and now she is got to fulfill the contract, so sad for her, Baba lured her over a candy bar now she must pay

Protesters Say The Darndest Things! – SJW CRINGE

This week Fleccas headed to the Earth Day March (protest) to see what Trump did this time. Lots of good Fleccas Talks action here!

S. Levi

Lol, nice flecca you burned that guy with the concentration camp sign. Good job bro on calling out that hypocrisy.

 Jimmy Pop Ali

S. Levi flecca just took a backseat and let the guy dig his own hole the more he spoke the deeper he got. He looked like he was on the verge of talking himself into changing his mind.
Tyler Fries

These idiots know nothing about how business works. What kind of CEO is doing the work himself? Answer: a bad one

You are awesome! First that you can fearlessly enter the belly of the beast. And second that you understand and can articulate the issues with obviously clueless people. More please!
Jessie Reissman

“I don’t pretend to know all the facts about it” but I will come to every protest and hold a trump Russia flag. God they are dumb!

I laughed so hard when he took his glasses off when the guy said Hillary has been more honest.
Jami Harpole

“Trumps a liar” “Who did you vote for?” “Hillary” His reaction after that was priceless! Had to take off his sunglasses to look that guy in the eyes to see if he was trolling him! 🤣 you sir earned another subscriber!

CNN Cuts Feed After Senator Objects to Clinton Foundation Atty Joining ‘Independent’ Counsel


by JOEL B. POLLAK13 Jun 2017

CNN cut away from a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday morning, seconds after Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) raised concerns that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had hired a former Clinton Foundation attorney to assist with the probe into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Graham was questioning Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who was sitting in for Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Democrats have long accused the Trump campaign of colluding with Russia, though no evidence has emerged. There is also speculation that Special Counsel Mueller will probe allegations of obstruction of justice against President Donald Trump.

Earlier this week, reports emerged that Mueller had hired attorneys for his investigative team who had donated to Hillary Clinton in the past, and one in particular who had represented the Clinton Foundation in its effort to block Freedom of Information Act requests for e-mails on Clinton’s private server.

Graham: Is giving political donations a reason to disqualify somebody for serving in the Special Counsel’s office?

Rosenstein: No, Senator, it is not a disqualification. It is not.

Graham: As a matter of fact, many states, the judges and prosecutors are actually elected. Donations are a part of that system, is that correct?

Rosenstein: Yes, that’s true.

Graham: Would it be a disqualification for somebody in the Special Counsel’s office who had represented Mrs. Clinton in the past to serve?

Rosenstein: You know, Senator, it would depend on facts and circumstances. As a general matter, I think the answer is no.

Graham: Isn’t that much closer to a conflict of interest?

Rosenstein: I don’t want to answer a hypothetical, Senator. Everybody needs to make a determination based on the facts and circumstances of the individual case.

Graham: How would you get it before the Special Counsel? What process could a member of the Senate use to inform the Special Counsel that you’d have a concern about hiring someone that represented Clinton?

Rosenstein: We have a process within the Department of Justice, Senator, so I would encourage you, if you have those concerns, to raise them with [former] Director Mueller or to raise them with me, and I’ll make sure —

Graham: So should I do it to you or to him?

Rosenstein: Well, you could do it to both.

Graham: Okay. That’s fair enough.

Rosenstein: And we have career —

Graham: And I don’t know if I’ll do that, but I’ve read some things that were — I don’t think donations are disqualifying at all, but if you represented the Clinton Foundation or Clinton herself, that would be disturbing to me, but I’ll take care of that.

CNN cut back to the studio shortly after that, while Graham was still questioning Rosenstein.

Earlier, Graham had asked Rosenstein whether there was “any reason, for cause, to fire Mr. Mueller.” Rosenstein had said he did not know of any reason.