Published on Jul 25, 2016
Subscribe now for more! http://bit.ly/1QHJwaK Hillary Clinton picked Paul Ryan, Republican Speaker of the House, to be her Vice Presidential running mate? Why would she do such a thing? Do young American liberals think this is a good strategy to beat Donald Trump in the 2016 Election? Media analyst Mark Dice
BY ASHE SCHOW
PHILADELPHIA — Shortly after Debbie Wasserman Schultz abruptly resigned from the Democratic National Committee, presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton named the Florida congresswoman to her campaign team.
Wasserman Schultz will serve as the “honorary chair” of Clinton’s campaign, a move the candidate announced in a short letter to supporters.
“I look forward to campaigning with Debbie in Florida and helping her in her re-election bid — because as president, I will need fighters like Debbie in Congress who are ready on day one to get to work for the American people,” Clinton wrote.
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ supporters have been stalking and booing Wasserman Schultz at all of her appearances at events surrounding the Democratic National Convention today. So Clinton’s decision to immediately bring her into her campaign looks a bit tone-deaf. In fact, it looks like a slobbery wet kiss and “thank you” for Wasserman Schultz’s role in rigging the primary process for Clinton. Especially since she named Wasserman Schultz to her campaign so quickly.
But is it a “thank you”? The initial optics look that way, but what if this was done to keep Wasserman Schultz from going ballistic?
Back in 2013, President Obama and other Democrats were quietly grumbling about Wasserman Schultz and wanted her out as chair of the DNC. When Wasserman Schultz “sensed” there would be a push to have her ousted, she prepared to call the leader of her party, Obama,anti-Semitic and anti-woman. That would be a heavy accusation coming from a Democratic Jewish woman against her own party (and a president whom Democrats adore), especially since her 2012 messaging was so heavy with accusations that Republicans were waging a “war on women.”
Perhaps Clinton and other Democratic officials wanted to blunt any outrage from Wasserman Schultz after she was actually forced to resign. If Wasserman Schultz was prepared to accuse the president of the United States and leader of her own party of anti-Semitism and being anti-woman out of anger — undoing all the work Democrats have done building themselves as the pro-woman and non-bigoted party — what would she have done had she not been granted a Clinton olive branch?
James Carville, Democrat political consultant extraordinaire – and former Bill Clinton campaign manager, has astonishingly come out and said what all good Republicans have known for decades: Not only are most Democrats politically clueless; they’re easily manipulated by the puppet masters of their party as well. Wow. James Freaking Carville. Of all people. Here’s an excerpt, as quoted on Amazon.com:
“Ideologies aren’t all that important. What’s important is psychology.
The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. That’s why I became an operative working with Democrats. With Democrats all you have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.
Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don’t have a clue as to political reality.
What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard workers and convince them that they should support social programs that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you want.
by DAN RIEHL
Listeners of Breitbart News Daily and Breitbart News Sunday on SiriusXM called into the shows to discuss their reaction to seeing the film Clinton Cash during its global premiere on Breitbart over the weekend. Many explained that they held viewing parties that included both liberals and progressives.
Brett in New York gathered friends and family, some of them very liberal. Brett said:
My wife’s sister and her husband and their friend are huge liberals. By the end, they said they will never be voting for Hillary, ever, ever, ever. And I even got my wife’s sister to put on a Make America Great Again hat. My sister-in-law said, “I hate this woman” after viewing Clinton Cash and being made aware of some of the Clinton Foundation’s corrupt practices.
Bret in Ohio also called in. “These people [the Clintons] mesh so perfectly into the corruption that’s pervasive in all the continents, essentially. … What really burns me is that it doesn’t appear that the Clintons or Obama … they don’t behave like Americans.”
Holly in Texas invited some independent and liberal friends to view Clinton Cash. “After the viewing, they were shocked. Initially, they were hanging back”, she said. “And then when they saw Haiti, that’s when they got hooked–really at Haiti and then also in Columbia, with the clear cutting of the forests. They went ballistic.” After the film, said Holly, “We had a discussion. And they were saying, “This explains why we’re not getting anything done in the government. That was their response. They were so frustrated with the government and why things are not happening, and this film, to them, explained why things are so out of control.”
Lisa in California said, “I have not been able to sleep, just tossing and turning after watching Clinton Cash. It’s just beyond disturbing. My husband and I watched with our thirty-year-old daughter and our twenty-two-year-old son, and my daughter said to me, ‘Mom, how do the Clintons get away with this?’ She was just astounded.”
Breitbart News Sunday is broadcast live on SiriusXM Patriot Channel 125 from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. Eastern. Listen to more comments from listeners below.
Mass media deception to conceal what’s really happening
JULY 25, 2016
Imagine if right-wing extremist neo-nazi skinheads had spent the last 8 months carrying out the same amount of terror that Islamists are responsible for.
Do you think the media would try to hide the hateful ideology behind it?