Scaramucci Terminates Suspected Leaker Michael Short from White House

by MATTHEW BOYLE25 Jul 2017Washington, D.C.

Suspected leaker Michael Short has been terminated from the White House communications office, Breitbart News can confirm.

Short, an ally of White House chief of staff Reince Priebus and now former Press Secretary Sean Spicer—who resigned last week—was terminated on Tuesday by new White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci.

Politico’s Tara Palmeri was the first to report the news.

“Newly appointed White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci said on Tuesday that he plans to dismiss assistant press secretary Michael Short,” Palmeri wrote on Tuesday morning. “It would be Scaramucci’s first step toward shaking up the communications shop, which has been dominated by former Republican National Committee staffers loyal to White House chief of staff Reince Priebus, a former RNC chairman.”

Short originally worked for the Trump campaign—placed on it by Priebus—and quit the campaign, sources tell Breitbart News, after the Access Hollywood tape came out. Politico confirmed this report, noting that Short walked out in the middle of the campaign leaving his computer behind only to show back up in January at the behest of the Republican National Committee (RNC) allies in the White House.

“He was scorned by many of his colleagues for quitting the Trump campaign, only to rejoin as a White House staffer because of Priebus,” Palmeri wrote of Short. “In a story often retold by campaign staffers, they arrived at Trump Tower one morning, months before the election, to see Short’s computer left open on his otherwise empty desk. He had quit the campaign that day and never returned. The next time he was seen by former campaign staffers was in January on their first day in the White House, where some were stunned to learn that they were going to have to work alongside him or for some of the press assistants subordinate to him.”

Multiple White House sources tell Breitbart News that Short was a leaker, and worked closely with now former White House deputy chief of staff Katie Walsh—another RNC wing official who was terminated earlier this year for her own suspected leaking.

Short has not responded to a request for comment on the questions about his leaking. But he did tell CNN he does not believe he has been fired, even though multiple White House sources confirm he has been.

“No one has told me anything and the entire premise is false,” Short told CNN.

Short denied to Breitbart News that he is a leaker. “I have never leaked,” he said in an email.

According to Palmeri, too, Short has now denied that he quit the campaign–he just says he went to work back at the RNC.

Capture

But it’s pretty clear that President Trump doesn’t buy it.

Capture

Scaramucci has confirmed multiple times in interviews over the weekend that he plans to root out leakers throughout the White House.

Now, on Tuesday, he has again confirmed that he will terminate everyone if necessary to stop the leaks.

Capture

Capture

Read More Stories About:

Big GovernmentBig JournalismAnthony ScaramucciDonald Trumpkatie walshleakerleaksMichael ShortReince PriebusSean SpicerWhite House

Former CIA Director Calls For A Coup If Trump Fires Mueller

The exchange is 43 minutes into the clip below:

by Tyler Durden

In the most vocal opposition to president Donald Trump yet, former CIA Director John Brennan said that if the White House tries to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, government officials should refuse to follow the president orders, as they would be – in his view – “inconsistent” with the duties of the executive branch.

“I think it’s the obligation of some executive branch officials to refuse to carry that out. I would just hope that this is not going to be a partisan issue. That Republicans, Democrats are going to see that the future of this government is at stake and something needs to be done for the good of the future,” Brennan told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer at the Aspen Security Forum, effectively calling for a coup against the president should Trump give the order to fire Mueller.

(Full transcript here)

Brennan appeared alongside his former colleague, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and both men who served in the Obama administration, told Blitzer they have total confidence in Mueller. “Absolutely. It was an inspired choice- they don’t come any better, ” Brennan said adding that “If Mueller is fired, I hope our elected reps will stand up and say enough is enough.” Some have responded with questions where Brennan’s devotion to the Constitution was in the aftermath of the events in Benghazi.

Falling back on his neocon roots, James Clapper, who has waged a long-running vendetta with Trump, once again warned about Russian interference in US affairs. When asked about the June 2016 meeting between Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort with a Russian lawyer and others, he responded: “I’m an old school, Cold War warrior and all that – so I have, there’s truth in advertising, great suspicions about the Russians and what they do. A lot of this to me had kind of the standard textbook tradecraft long deployed by Russians. It would have been a really good idea maybe to have vetted whoever they were meeting with.”

Clapper was also asked about Trump’s comparison of the intelligence community to Nazi Germany. Clapper said he called the President-elect nine days before he left the Obama administration saying he “couldn’t let that reference pass” and it was an insult to him, CIA Director John Brennan and the workforce. “That was a terrible, insulting affront, not just to me or John, we get paid the big bucks, but I’m talking about the rank and file, men and women, patriots and intelligence community — that was completely inappropriate and over the top – I had to do something about it.”

And so he did: on the call Clapper said Trump asked him to “to put out a statement rebutting the contents of the dossier which I couldn’t and wouldn’t do. It was kind of transactional” referring to a dossier that alleged ties between President Donald Trump‘s campaign and Russia. It was not clear if he wouldn’t and couldn’t do it because the contents were legitimate, in his view, or because the dossier is what started the whole “Russian collusion” narrative in the first place. Curiously, Clapper saw it as a favor to Trump not to issue a statement: Clapper was asked by Blitzer why he didn’t put out a statement replying: “The whole point of the dossier by the way was we felt an obligation to warn him to alert him to the fact it was out there. That was the whole point.”

It was not clear if James Comey, whose subsequent leak to the NYT led to the appointment of Mueller, would have applied the same reasoning when asked by Trump to rebut the dossier’s contents.

 

*(FROM EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE) – Interview of McKenzie Kyger, Evergreen student silenced for being white (WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF THESE STUDENTS WERE WHITE?)

Excerpts, Benjamin Boyce interview of McKenzie Kyger, 7/15/2017 (shorter version). [UPDATE: McKenzie ft. on Tucker Carlson here: 
https://twitter.com/BadgerPundit/stat….].]

Original version, with about 11,500 views (currently marked private) here: https://youtu.be/sqvdQ6Zf6bU

Excerpts used with permission; full interview here: https://youtu.be/6uTm7_GE6So

MUSIC CREDIT: “Revolution” cover from 2014 performance by Imagine Dragons, on Youtube here: https://youtu.be/Z90BpfpMJ_0

“Revolution,” of course, aptly illustrates the core problem at Evergreen being discussed by Kyger, because John Lennon wrote it in 1968 to criticize (indeed, mock) far-left radicals who were acting on the view that violence is an acceptable means of advancing social justice. https://www.scribd.com/document/34656…

Rebecca Hefner 

 Pinned by Badger Pundit
If whites had done what the blacks did at Evergreen everyone would have lost their minds. National guard would have been called in, BLM would be marching and rioting. But we are just supposed to accept this and sit back and do nothing. If you do speak out you’re a racist and targeted. This shit has got to stop and stop now.
Despiser Despised 

America never “needed” an affirmative action President. Look at the disastrous results. 0bama’s bill isn’t evn due yet. When that hits it will make the depression look like child’s play. Do you have any clue what America’s unfunded liabilities are, at nearly zero percent interest? Nobody does. Don’t you think that is a problem? The funded debt is over 22 trillion now. My guess is that America’s unfunded liability is nearing 500 trillion now. Entire wealth of everything in the entire World? 700 trillion… 0bama enslaved my unborn progeny to the State without their consent. FUCK YOU… A short reminder of the scandal free 0bama years. Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 was the call sign for a helicopter shot down by the Taliban in eastern Afghanistan on Aug. 6, 2011. ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act NSA: Spying on Americans Illegally conducting war against Libya Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’ Anwar al Awlaki
Celtic Warrior 

America is destroying itself by letting People of “Colour” into their Colleges who don’t deserve to be there because their marks aren’t good enough. Nature requires Survival of the most intelligent, that’s how Man has built Civilisation and Great Empires. Wake up America! We need to go forwards not backwards in Human Evolution. No Species ever evolved in an easy environment..
friggingbomb88 

and I wonder why mainstream media never showed or report somethimg like this. they just said there was a protest in campus when race tensions ran high. the leftist media is too embarrassed to admit they’re wrong. fuck them
EVP Kiernan 

Watch, by next year Evergreen’s admissions will drop by 50%, and Evergreen will collapse
Sambo Elguapo 

blm may not like that white people have most of the power in the world, but just think for a second how the world would be if blacks where in control of the entire world.
Jimmy Simard 

No need to think much… just look how it went in South Africa.
Andrew Olson 

And Zimbabwe, and most of sub Saharan Africa.
ll ll 

black people are the most racist of all

*(FROM EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE) – Evergreen president: Even WORST student agitators were merely placed on probation!

Not even the students who F-BOMBED THE YOUNG CHILDREN of Stacy Brown, the new campus police chief, were punished! 

Law & Justice Committee work session, Washington State Senate, June 20, 2017 (Mike Padden, chair).

Full video here: https://www.tvw.org/watch/?eventID=20….

(This clip combines material from roughly 1:16:30 to 1:18:00, and from 1:22:25 to 1:27, with some editing for brevity.)

Bio of Dave Pearsall, Chief of the Thurston County Sheriff’s Office, here: http://www.co.thurston.wa.us/sheriff/…

Bio of Evergreen President George Bridges’ here: https://www.evergreen.edu/president/b…

Korri Galbraith 

What really disgusts me about him is he constantly reminds them that HE felt no fear, so he deemed there was no reason to have law enforcement come in. He had no knowledge of what was happening on campus, as he was effectively held hostage. How did he know there weren’t groups like this all over the campus at the time? How did he know that he was the only person facing an encounter? He didn’t, he made a decision about himself that literally puts the entire campus at risk! It’s disgusting. Well, I don’t feel threatened if somebody says that they are going to shoot up the staff at evergreen and get in their truck and leave to do it. So I’m not calling the police. I don’t feel threatened when I see a rape, or a murder, or a robbery, or a physical attack. So we shouldn’t involve the police. Fuck everybody else, it’s all about me and my belief structure. I am in charge.
Kieran Thurlow 

This guy needs to be fired
Rascal77s 

Disgusting spineless communist. This roach needs to be removed immediately and civil suits filed against the college by all people that this scumbag refused to protect.
Echo Bluff 

This man is a coward help captive by his misguided beliefs on equity
Vanessa Yaeggy 

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what a spineless limp d–k looks like.
CLUCKY CLUCK 

The Evergreen president asks for more police presence, yet let hisowen police chief be humiliated without consequences.
John Chappell 

Relax, my dudes….All of the students involved received participation trophies, so it’s all good.
danny thibodaux 

Close evergreen down!!

Massachusetts can’t legally hold immigrants on ICE detainer requests – state court

The top court in Massachusetts has ruled that authorities have no right to hold an immigrant after they have been released for a crime. However, some on the federal level disagree.

*

The state’s Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruled Monday after the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement requested a court order that illegal immigrants facing deportation be held for up to 48 hours after their initial cases are resolved.

*

That amounts to a new arrest of a person, the state court found, which is not authorized by the laws of Massachusetts. This is the first ruling of this situation that applies to an entire state, according to Massachusetts’ attorney general, Maura Healey, Reuters reported.

The decision by the court cited states’ rights in their final decision in the case.

“Massachusetts law provides no authority for Massachusetts court officers to arrest and hold an individual solely on the basis of a Federal civil immigration detainer, beyond the time that the individual would otherwise be entitled to be released from State custody,” the court wrote, according to court documents.

Sreynuon Lunn, of Cambodia, was the focus of the case. Lunn entered the US in 1985 as a refugee, but was ordered to be deported in 2008 due to a slew of criminal convictions. His home country declined to accept him, and so he was ordered free. However, Lunn was arrested again in Boston in 2016 for unarmed robbery. Suffolk County prosecutors failed to present a case against him, and he was released into the custody of ICE, Reuters reported.

After being detained by the agency, Lunn’s attorney challenged the transfer to ICE custody because of the fact that Massachusetts law does not allow police to keep anyone in their custody who do not have any pending charges. The ruling on Monday states that neither the federal nor state law has the power, in Massachusetts, to hold a person without a criminal warrant.

“In short, this was a civil immigration detainer,” the justices wrote, according to the documents. “It alleged that Lunn was subject to, and was being sought by the Federal authorities for the purpose of, the civil process of removal. It was not a criminal detainer or a criminal arrest warrant. It did not allege that the Federal authorities were seeking Lunn for a criminal immigration offense or any other Federal crime, for purposes of a criminal prosecution.”

Capture

The US Department of Justice lawyers had previously stated in the case that ICE detainer requests are an established legal example of cooperation between federal and local law enforcement.

“You have that power,” Joshua Press, a DOJ attorney, said in April during oral arguments in the case, the Boston Herald reported.

The SJC did not agree with the assertions of the DOJ and stated that the state police may only make arrests for criminal offenses. “Conspicuously absent from our common law is any authority (in the absence of a statute) for police officers to arrest generally for civil matters, let alone authority to arrest specifically for Federal civil immigration matters,” the judges wrote.

Some civil rights groups say that this ruling in Massachusetts could potentially set an example for rulings in states around the country. The ACLU of Massachusetts responded in a statement after the trial’s conclusion.

“This court decision sets an important precedent that we are a country that upholds the constitution and the rule of law,” the group said in a statement. “This victory is the first of its kind in the nation. At a time when the Trump administration is pushing aggressive and discriminatory immigration enforcement policies, Massachusetts is leading nationwide efforts by limiting how state and local law enforcement assist with federal immigration enforcement.” 

Capture

“POWERFUL”: HUFFINGTON POST CELEBRATES TRANSGENDER “MAN” WITH PERIOD-STAINED PANTS

‘Free-bleeding’ 4Chan troll adopted for real by leftists

 | Infowars.com – JULY 24, 2017

An absurd joke that started off as a 4chan troll – the depiction of women openly displaying their period-stained pants in the name of social justice – has actually been adopted for real by the left.

“Free-bleeding,” the practice of avoiding feminine hygiene products because they are an oppressive tool of the “patriarchy” and part of male “period-shaming,” began life as a hoax created by members of the notorious 4chan message board back in 2014.

4chan pranksters attempted to troll feminists by convincing them that displaying their period-sodden pants was making a stand for women’s liberation.

Over the course of the next 12 months, numerous progressives fell for it completely, embracing the sight of blood-soaked crotches as a social justice cause.

Fast forward to last week, when “transgender artist” Cass Clemmer, a biological female, posted a picture of him/herself wearing blood-stained pants while holding a sign that read, “Periods are not just for women. #BleedingWhileTrans.”

Capture

Capture

The Huffington Post celebrated the image by declaring it to be a “powerful attempt to broaden the cultural understanding of the different types of people who experience menstruation.”

According to HuffPo, the photo proves that “women aren’t the only ones who get periods.”

Capture

Given the fact that the individual in the photo is a woman and that there are only two genders (reference; science), yes it does prove exactly that.

The photo was also lauded by numerous other leftist publications like the IndependentMashable, and Allure.

The phenomenon is akin Poe’s law in reverse.

Poe’s law states that “it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers or viewers as a sincere expression of the parodied views.”

Only this time around, the left has actually embraced the parody and turned it into a genuine claim that women, and transgender biological males who identify as women, are oppressed because society thinks period stains are disgusting.

Period stains are disgusting. They are as disgusting as someone who has pissed their pants and is walking around in public flaunting the fact that they have pissed their pants.

Pretending that bodily functions necessitate a righteous social justice crusade cannot change the nature of reality. Sorry.

Oh yeah, and there are only two genders. That’s science. Deal with it.

Medicaid Enrollees Set to Climb 40 Million Under Obamacare…

Capture

By Terence P. Jeffrey | July 24, 2017 | 5:37 PM EDT

(CNSNews.com) – Under current law—including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (AKA Obamacare)—there will be 112,000,000 people who enroll in Medicaid at some time during fiscal 2027, according to the latest baseline estimate published by the Congressional Budget Office.

That would be an increase of 40,000,000 from fiscal 2013, the last year before Obamacare’s expansion of the Medicaid program went into effect.

In fiscal 2013, according to CBO, there were 72,000,000 enrolled in Medicaid at some point during the year.

Capture

At 112,000,000, enrollees in the U.S. Medicaid program would outnumber the 2016 Census Bureau regional population estimates for the American West (76,657,000); the Midwest (67,941,429); and the Northeast (56,209,510). Only the South—with a Census Bureau-estimated population of 122,319,574 in 2016—had more people living in it last year than the CBO expects will be enrolled in Medicaid at some point in fiscal 2027.

The CBO’s baseline estimates for Medicaid enrollment list two different annual numbers for the program. One is the “average monthly enrollment” and the other is the “total” enrollment.

The “average monthly enrollment” numbers, CBO explained in its latest baseline, “represent the number of beneficiaries, with full and partial benefits, who are enrolled on an average monthly basis.” The “total” enrollment is the “total number of individuals enrolled in Medicaid at any point during the fiscal year.”

The Medicaid baseline projections that the CBO published in April 2014, shortly after the Obamacare Medicaid expansion started to take effect, said that in fiscal 2013 (which had ended on Sept. 30, 2013), there had been a total of 72 million people enrolled in Medicaid and that the average monthly enrollment had been 58 million.

The CBO’s most recent Medicaid baseline projection, published in January 2017, said there was a total of 97 million people enrolled in Medicaid in fiscal 2016 and that the average monthly enrollment for 2016 was 76 million.

That means total annual Medicaid enrollment, according to CBO’s numbers, had increased by 25 million from fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2016 (rising from 72 million to 97 million) and that average monthly enrollment had increased by 18 million (rising from 58 million to 76 million).

The CBO’s January 2017 baseline projection for Medicaid estimates that by fiscal 2027 average monthly enrollment in Medicaid will climb to 87 million and total enrollment will climb to 112 million.

If the CBO projection is correct, that means that from fiscal 2013, the year before Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion took effect, to fiscal 2027, the average monthly enrollment in Medicaid will increase by 29 million (rising from 58 million to 87 million) and total enrollment will increase by 40 million (rising from 72 million to 112 million).

“Historically, Medicaid eligibility has generally been limited to certain low-income children, pregnant women, parents of dependent children, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities; however, as of January 1, 2014, states have the option to extend Medicaid coverage to most nonelderly, low-income individuals,” the Congressional Research Service explained in a report on the Obamacare Medicaid expansion.

“The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; P.L. 111-148 as amended) established 133% of the federal poverty level (FPL) (effectively 138% of FPL with an income disregard of 5% of FPL) as the new mandatory minimum Medicaid income eligibility level for most nonelderly individuals,” said CRS.

“If a state accepts the ACA Medicaid expansion funds, it must abide by the expansion coverage rules,” said CRS.