Wasserman Schultz Threatens Police Chief Holding Her Laptop In Espionage Investigation

Screen Shot 2017-05-27 at 4.41.12 PM

By Rick Wells

Rep Debbie Wasserman Schultz is upset that one of her computers is being held by the Capitol Police in an investigation into just another of the many instances of espionage surrounding the Democrats and the mishandling of sensitive information.  The computer may contain information relevant to an apparent spy ring involving three brothers, Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan, who were involved in doing IT work for Congressional Democrats at exorbitantly high rates and who are all Pakistanis suspected of funneling sensitive data to terrorist organizations.

The three have all been barred from the House computer system and Imran, who did work for Wasserman Schultz, appears to have left some relevant data or other evidence on her computer. There’s also the simultaneous investigation into the brothers kidnapping their step mother and holding her against her will until their father died in order to steal her inheritance.

Then again, as the DNC chair when Seth Rich was murdered, perhaps she’s concerned there is evidence that could implicate her in that regard. It’s too late for Bleachbit now and with her mug, there’s no way she’ll be able to blend in with a crowd and just disappear. If there’s evidence, she’s in trouble.

DWS tries to pressure the Capitol Police Chief, engaging in the obstruction of justice that Democrats love to throw out in attacks on the innocent, the same offense, along with perjury, that got Bill Clinton impeached. Her effort to intimidate the Chief into compliance is going nowhere. As long as she doesn’t try to force him to kiss her, he’s not going to be bullied.

Schultz tries manipulating the rules, saying, “If the member loses the equipment, says they lose the equipment and it is found by the Capitol Police, it is supposed to be returned.” He replies, “If ownership has been established, it will be returned. If it is subject to an ongoing investigation…” “Okay, but not an ongoing investigation related to the member,” says Schultz. She repeats that argument a couple of times to no avail. What makes her think she’s not under investigation?

The Chief says there are extenuating circumstance, so you’re out of luck, “Little Hillary.” Your typical Democrat bullying isn’t going to work this time around. What’s on there that she is so desperate to keep anyone from seeing? Did she perhaps have some evidence on Hillary Clinton that she was using to blackmail her and now it’s going to be exposed? With Democrats anything is possible. She wraps up a warning to the Chief that she feels he’s violating the rules and should expect that there will be consequences. She sits on a committee that oversees their budget so her threats are not without substance.

The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group reports that “A laptop used by Imran was hidden in an unused crevice of the Rayburn House Office Building. Wasserman Schultz’s office is in Longworth House Office Building, a separate structure. The laptop was later found by Capitol Police and seized because it was relevant to the criminal investigation.” That means there is criminal evidence on the DWS laptop – although it may be ignored like the similar situation with the Clintons is still going nowhere.

The Daily Caller asked Wasserman Schultz on Monday about her strong desire for the laptop, but she refused to discuss the issue, reversing course in the middle of a question and a hallway and taking shelter in the office she had just left. Outside of Clinton or Obama themselves, it couldn’t happen to a more deserving individual than Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

DNC LAWSUIT COUNTY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR MURDER LINKED TO AWAN BROTHERS DC PROBE: Capitol Police DNC

Published on May 27, 2017

It’s unclear where Whisenant actually died. His body was found washing up on the shore just south of Magnolia Terrace on Hollywood beach early Wednesday by a passerby.

Joe Morrell

George Webb has been hammering this too…shits going down.
sp〈0_0〉zer

Naw it’s just another botched robbery.
TheBase1aransas

The SWAMP is not going to go quietly into the good night.
James Miller

Somebody should be watching the cops doing the investigation or it will end up like the rich cover up.
Miguel Torres

Not to forget to mention the murder of John Ashe, another death associated with the Democratic Party and a corrupt Chinese business man. Just sayin’
John Smith

Debbie said “There would be CONSEQUENCES” if she did not get her shit back!
Juan Banda S

We’re getting close, hence they are all-in. I admire your courage,HA. We got your back, bro. Truth is grandiose.
AntiquityCentury21

America, face the truth. The Democratic Party is a dangerous death cult.

Reports: At Least Three Anti-Trump Leakers Identified, Referred to Proper Authorities, Expected to Be Fired Soon

Screen Shot 2017-05-27 at 3.50.49 PM

by MATTHEW BOYLE27 May 2017

At least two separate news organizations are reporting that three distinct leakers have been identified at the White House and that President Donald Trump is expected to fire them when he returns from his first overseas trip.

CBS News has confirmed from two sources that three leakers of classified information at the White House have been identified and are expected to be fired,” CBS News reported this week, adding, “Officials within the Trump White House believe leaks of Mr. Trump’s conversation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov are a ‘deliberate attempt’ by officials who are holdovers from President Obama’s administration and are trying to damage the Trump presidency.”

In addition, this week, chief One America News Network (OANN) White House correspondent Trey Yingst also reported that three White House leakers have been identified and referred to the proper authorities.

Yingst wrote on Twitter that the three leakers have been carelessly leaking classified information to hurt President Trump politically and that Trump is expected to fire “multiple people” connected with the network of leakers upon his return to the White House:

Screen Shot 2017-05-27 at 3.55.54 PM

Multiple White House aides, asked for comment about the CBS News and OANN reports, declined to comment when reached by Breitbart News.

HILLARY: TRUMP WILL BE IMPEACHED

Clinton launches an all-out attack on the president and his ‘obstruction of justice’… after breaking out in ANOTHER coughing fit on stage

Hillary Clinton suggested her campaign rival President Trump will get impeached, in sharp remarks in a commencement address Friday where she brought up ‘obstruction of justice’ and warned of the steps to authoritarianism.

Speaking to gowned graduates at the school where she addressed students in 1969, Clinton referenced the resignation of President Richard Nixon and a House committee’s impeachment investigation – but it was clear to graduating students what she was really talking about.

‘We were furious about the past presidential election of a man whose presidency would eventually end in disgrace with his impeachment for obstruction of justice,’ the defeated presidential candidate said – as members of the crowd at the liberal campus erupted into cheers.

Then she brought up Nixon’s ‘firing the the person running the investigation into him at the Department of Justice’ – a line that brought laughs and more cheers.

Both were obvious shots at Trump, who fired FBI Director James Comey in the midst of an agency probe of Russian meddling in the U.S. elections. The move brought parallels to Nixon’s ‘Saturday Night Massacre,’ when Nixon got rid of independent special prosecutor Archibald Cox.

As she addressed students, Clinton also pointed to the evolution of ‘authoritarian’ regimes, in a criticism of Trump’s constant attacks on the media and his critics.

‘When people in power invent their own facts and attack those who question them, it can mark the beginning of the end of a free society,’ she warned. ‘That is not hyperbole, it is what authoritarian regimes throughout history have done.’ 

‘You are graduating at a time when there is a full-fledged assault on truth and reason,’ she told graduates, referencing White House counselor Kellyanne Conway’s defense of ‘alternative facts.’

‘We were furious about the past presidential election of a man whose presidency would eventually end in disgrace with his impeachment for obstruction of justice’

In yet another shot at Trump, Clinton said: ‘Some were even denying things we see with our own eyes, like the size of crowds.’ 

Clinton joked about her loss, but said she has had time for grandchildren and long walks in the woods. 'Chardonnay helped a little too,' she quipped

Clinton joked about her loss, but said she has had time for grandchildren and long walks in the woods. ‘Chardonnay helped a little too,’ she quipped

‘We got through that tumultuous time,’ she told the students, as she described the social conflicts during the late 1960s when she graduated.

‘We revved up the engine of imagination and innovation. We turned back a tide of intolerance and embraced inclusion,’ she said.

‘It was millions of ordinary citizens, especially young people, who voted, marched and organized’ to bring changes, she said.

Clinton served as a young staffer when the House Judiciary drew up articles of impeachment against Nixon and investigated his actions during Watergate.

She didn’t mention that her husband Bill Clinton was impeached during his second term, in an event that brought blowback for the Republicans who went after him.

THE IMPEACHED PRESIDENT HILLARY SOMEHOW FORGOT TO MENTION IN HER SPEECH… BILL 

What about Bill? Hillary Clinton forgot to mention her husband when speaking to grads about impeached presidents

What about Bill? Hillary Clinton forgot to mention her husband when speaking to grads about impeached presidents

Hillary Clinton suggested – slightly misleadingly – that Richard Nixon was impeached. In fact the process began, but the articles of impeachment were never voted on because of his resignation.

However she could have mentioned a much more recent president who definitely was impeached: her husband. 

And while she described Nixon’s presidency as ‘ending in obstruction of justice and impeachment’, she actually lived through her husband being tried in the Senate for precisely that charge.

It might come as little surprise that Hillary did not mention the painful episode, as it put her marriage on very public trial too.

Bill Clinton faced trial after the House of Representatives cited two articles of impeachment. He was charged with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice.

The trial hinged on whether or not he lied about having sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. She was subpoenaed by Paula Jones who was suing Clinton for sexual harassment, which he denied.

Clinton famously said on TV: ‘I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky’, when speaking about the affair. He said the same thing in the deposition in the Jones lawsuit. 

But he later admitted to having ‘inappropriate’ contact with the then 21-year-old White House intern.

He said he had received oral sex from Lewinsky, but claimed he did not reciprocate. Whether that was a lie would hang on the definition of ‘sexual relations’.

The affair and the graphic sexual details were detailed in prosecutor Kenneth Starr’s report. 

It included the detail about Lewinsky’s blue dress stained with the president’s semen. It also detailed how he allegedly used a cigar as a sex toy with Lewinsky, and then put it in his mouth.

Clinton spoke live on TV in a closed-door testimony to a grand jury, but never used the word ‘sex’ when talking about his contact with Lewinsky.

President Andrew Johnson was impeached in 1868 for violating an act to replace a member of his cabinet

President Andrew Johnson was impeached in 1868 for violating an act to replace a member of his cabinet

The reasons Starr outlined for impeachment in the report included perjury, obstruction of justice, witness-tampering and abuse of power. Clinton’s trial began on January 7, 1999 for articles one and three of impeachment.

On February 12, Clinton didn’t receive the two third majority vote from Congress to impeach. 

In total, 45 Democrats and 10 Republicans voted he was not guilty – making him the only president to survive an impeachment trial.

The other president who was fully impeached survived – even more narrowly. 

Andrew Johnson was Abraham Lincoln’s Vice President and came to power after his assassination in 1865.

At that time, Republicans had a majority hold on Congress. They passed the Tenure of Office Act in 1867 which prevented the president from kicking officials out of office who were appointed by the Senate.

Cabinet member, Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, disagreed with Johnson’s views on Reconstruction. Stanton was part of the radical Republican coalition which wanted to see a total end to slavery.

But Johnson’s Reconstruction policy was lenient and would have allowed local southern governments to enable ‘back codes’ which essentially preserved the practice of slavery. 

In the fall of 1867, Johnson tried to replace Stanton with Union General Ulysses S Grant. But the Supreme Court refused to rule on the case and Stanton kept his job.

Again, Johnson tried to get rid of Stanton by replacing him with General Lorenzo Thomas a few months later in 1868.  Stanton locked himself in his office and refused to leave his post.

Johnson was charged with obstruction of justice, and  Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase presided over Johnson’s impeachment. It was a public spectacle and Congressmen were deluged with requests for tickets.

On March 16, 35 senators voted to convict for ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ while 19 voted to acquit – one more vote would have removed him from office but Johnson narrowly survived.

His reputation is another matter; he has repeatedly been named the worst president ever to lead the nation. 

 Source: History.com

Clinton began with remarks about the ‘amazing futures’ of school grads. She encouraged them to seek office and take other steps to make the world better.

It didn’t take long for her to break into a coughing fit, something that happened frequently during her campaign.

‘And I’ve gotta get a lozenge,’ she said, as the crowd clapped in support.

‘Whatever your path, you dreamed big,’ she told graduating students.

Back in 1969, Clinton spoke about the push and pull of politics to fellow graduates of her school.

‘We’ve had lots of empathy; we’ve had lots of sympathy, but we feel that for too long our leaders have viewed politics as the art of the possible,’ she said. ‘And the challenge now is to practice politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible possible.’

Clinton started her remarks with a familiar coughing fit, then took out a lozenge

Clinton started her remarks with a familiar coughing fit, then took out a lozenge

Excerpts from Hillary Clinton’s 1969 Wellesley commencement speech

Even as she went after President Trump by alluding to crimes, she also made light of her defeat.

‘You may have heard that things didn’t go exactly the way I’ve planned. But you know what, I’m doing okay,’ she said to laughs.

‘I’ve gotten to spend time with my family, especially my amazing grandchildren,’ she said.

‘Long walks in the woods …  Organizing my closets … I won’t lie, Chardonnay helped a little too,’ she quipped.

Clinton brought up her ‘Onward together’ PAC, but provided little information about how it would work. She said it would involve recruiting candidates and other organizing.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4545826/Hillary-Clinton-invokes-IMPEACHMENT-speech-grads.html#ixzz4iJTUxGsG
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

BRITISH TAXPAYERS FINANCED MANCHESTER TERROR ATTACK: POLICE

[Salman] Abedi was given at least £7,000 from the taxpayer-funded Student Loans Company

Chris Menahan Information LiberationMAY 27, 2017

Taxpayer-funded student loans and other forms of government welfare were used to finance Salman Abedi’s suicide bombing attack in Manchester, according to police.

From The Telegraph:

[Salman] Abedi was given at least £7,000 from the taxpayer-funded Student Loans Company after beginning a business administration degree at Salford University in October 2015.

It is thought he received a further £7,000 in the 2016 academic year even though by then he had already dropped out of the course. Salford University declined to say if it had informed the Student Loans Company that Abedi’s funding should have been stopped.

Separately, the Department for Work and Pensions refused to say if Abedi had received any benefits, including housing benefit and income support worth up to £250 a week, during 2015 and 2016. It would only say he was not claiming benefits in the weeks before the attack.

Abedi, 22, never held down a job, according to neighbours and friends, but was able to travel regularly between the UK and Libya.

Abedi also had sufficient funds to buy materials for his sophisticated bomb while living in a rented house in south Manchester.

Six weeks before the bombing Abedi rented a second property in a block of flats in Blackley eight miles from his home, paying £700 in cash.

He had enough money to rent a third property in the centre of Manchester from where he set off with a backpack containing the bomb.

Abedi also withdrew £250 in cash three days before the attack and transferred £2,500 to his younger brother Hashim in Libya, who is accused of knowing about the attack in advance.

This same scam is being run again and again:

David Videcette, a former Metropolitan police detective who worked on the 7/7 London bombing investigation, said of the student loans’ system: “It is an easy way for a terrorist to move forward and finance their activities at the expense of the taxpayer.

“All you have got to do is get yourself into university and then off you go. Often they have go no intention of turning up.”

Professor Anthony Glees, director of Buckingham University’s Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies, said: “The British system makes funds readily available to jihadist students without checks on them. There needs to be an inquiry into this.”

Abedi father and brother were both arrested on suspicion of being involved in the attack.

Abedi’s brother reportedly spoke to him “minutes” before the attack.

22 people, including many children, were killed in Monday’s attack and dozens more were injured.

Not mentioned in this report is that Abedi’s parents were accepted into the UK as so-called “refugees” from Libya, which no doubt entailed their family collecting tens of thousands more pounds in welfare.