USAA joins leftist campaign to shut down free speech

Jamie White | – MAY 26, 2017

USAA is the latest company to pull its advertising from Sean Hannity’s show following a string of ad cancellations from numerous companies after the Fox News host started focusing on murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich and his reported ties to WikiLeaks.

The financial services company, which caters to military members and their families, made a statement on Twitter that it had discontinued running its ads during Hannity because it was against company policy to have “ads running during certain opinion-based programs” – a policy which USAA apparently didn’t enforce before.

Screen Shot 2017-05-26 at 6.28.09 PM

Several companies, including and Peloton, have already suspended their advertising from Hannity’s show after the host looked into the possibility that Seth Rich was killed because he was allegedly a Wikileaks source.

Hannity then accused liberal lobbying organization Media Matters for America (MMFA) of “liberal fascism,” claiming they were mounting a targeted campaign against him after they released a list of companies that advertised during Hannity’s show.

Screen Shot 2017-05-26 at 6.29.12 PM

“To all my friends. Today, George Soros, & Hillary Clinton supported Mediamatters is targeting all of my advertisers to try and get me fired,” Hannity tweeted Wednesday.

Screen Shot 2017-05-26 at 6.30.08 PM

“Spoke to many advertisers. They are being inundated with emails to stop advertising on my show. This is Soros/Clinton/Brock liberal fascism.”

Hannity’s show wasn’t the only news outlet that was financially targeted for political purposes.

Earlier this year, online advertiser Adroll severed ties with Infowars in an effort to suppress its political speech, evidenced by Adroll’s failure to provide proof that Infowars somehow violated its “Website Content” guidelines, and its partnership with technocratic companies like Facebook and Google – staunch supporters of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential race.

This conclusion is also supported by the fact that Adroll even slandered Breitbart News, accusing them of “hate speech” with no examples to back up its claim.

In reality, the political establishment via organizations like MMFA are pressuring large corporations to create a chilling effect on free speech through economic warfare by cutting financial ties with libertarian and conservative platforms like Infowars and Hannity.

WHCD Host Hasan Minhaj Blasts ‘Liar-in-Chief’ Trump: ‘The Orange Man Behind the Muslim Ban’



Comedian Hasan Minhaj slammed President Donald Trump and members of his administration Saturday night during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner (WHCA) in Washington, D.C.

The Daily Show correspondent called Trump the “liar-in-chief,” ripped the president’s immigration policy, and fired off several personal insults at Vice President Mike Pence and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

“Welcome to the series finale of the White House Correspondents’ Dinner,” Minhaj’s politically-charged monologue began.

“The leader of our country is not here. And that’s because he lives in Moscow,” Minhaj said to applause from the crowd of celebrities, politicians, and journalists, many of them from the country’s largest media organizations.

President Trump was headlining a first 100 days rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania — his absence from the WHCD marks the first time in 36 years that a sitting president has missed the event.

“I think he’s in Pennsylvania because he can’t take a joke” Minhaj said of the commander-in-chief.

“This event is about celebrating the first amendment and free speech,” Minhaj said.

Donald Trump doesn’t care about free speech,” he added.

Minhaj said he was asked not to mock the Trump White House in the president’s absence from the event, but he wasted no time taking aim at Pence, saying the Vice President’s wife wouldn’t let him attend the annual event “because apparently one of you ladies is ovulating.”

“He tweets at 3 a.m. sober. Who is tweeting at 3 a.m. sober?” Minhaj said of the president. “Donald Trump – because it’s 10 a.m. in Russia. Those are business hours.”

The crowd of journalists cringed as Minhaj turned his scorn toward Sessions.

“Jeff Sessions could not be here tonight. He is doing a pre-civil war enactment. On his RSVP he wrote, ‘No.’ Just ‘no’ — Which happens to be his second favorite n-word,” Minhaj said to an audible groan from the crowd.

Minhaj also called White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon a Nazi.

“Now a lot of people think that Steve Bannon is the reason Donald Trump is a racist,” he said. “That is not true. Is he here? I do not see Steve Bannon. I do not see Steve Bannon. Not see. Nazi Steve Bannon. Nazi Steve Bannon.”

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer was also slammed during Minhaj’s screed.

“Spicer isn’t here tonight because I think he’s at home Googling how to fake his own death,” he said.

Minhaj, who is a Muslim, opened his monologue with a joke about the speculation that former President Barack Obama is a Muslim.

“Who would have thought with everything going on in the country right now that a Muslim would be standing on this stage for a ninth year in a row, baby,” Minhaj joked.

“Only in America can a first generation Indian Muslim kid get on this stage and make fun of the president — the orange man behind the Muslim ban,” he added.

The Comedy Central star also roasted Fox News and slammed the network’s former primetime anchor Bill O’Reilly.

“I’m amazed Fox News even showed up—It’s hard to trust you guys when you backed a man like Bill O’Reilly for years,” Minhaj said to audible boos from the audience. “You gave O’Reilly a $25M severance package — only package he won’t force a woman to touch.”




The Murdochs have decided Bill O’Reilly’s 21-year run at Fox News will come to an end. According to sources briefed on the discussions, network executives are preparing to announce O’Reilly’s departure before he returns from an Italian vacation on April 24. Now the big questions are how the exit will look and who will replace him.

Wednesday morning, according to sources, executives are holding emergency meetings to discuss how they can sever the relationship with the country’s highest-rated cable-news host without causing collateral damage to the network. The board of Fox News’ parent company, 21st Century Fox, is scheduled to meet on Thursday to discuss the matter.

Sources briefed on the discussions say O’Reilly’s exit negotiations are moving quickly. Right now, a key issue on the table is whether he would be allowed to say good-bye to his audience, perhaps the most loyal in all of cable (O’Reilly’s ratings have ticked up during the sexual-harassment allegations). Fox executives are leaning against allowing him to have a sign-off, sources say. The other main issue on the table is money. O’Reilly recently signed a new multiyear contract worth more than $20 million per year. When Roger Ailes left Fox News last summer, the Murdochs paid out $40 million, the remainder of his contract.

According to sources, Fox News wants the transition to be seamless. Executives are currently debating possible replacement hosts. Names that have been discussed include Eric Bolling, Dana Perino, and Tucker Carlson, who would move from his successful 9 p.m. slot and create a need for a new host at that time. One source said Sean Hannity is happy at 10 p.m. and would not want to move.

The Murdochs’ decision to dump O’Reilly shocked many Fox News staffers I’ve spoken to in recent days. Late last week, the feeling inside the company was that Rupert Murdoch would prevail over his son James, who lobbied to jettison the embattled host. It’s still unclear exactly how the tide turned. According to one source, Lachlan Murdoch’s wife helped convince her husband that O’Reilly needed to go, which moved Lachlan into James’s corner. The source added that senior executives at other divisions within the Murdoch empire have complained that if O’Reilly’s allegations had happened to anyone else at their companies, that person would be gone already.

Spokespersons for 21st Century Fox and Fox News did not respond to requests for comment, nor did O’Reilly’s agent, Carole Cooper.

Sources: The Murdochs Are Turning Against Bill O’Reilly

President Bashar Al-Assad

Screenshot 2017-04-06 17.40.34

Bashar Al-Assad. By no means a perfect leader but not the devil the western media is making him out to be. Those who don’t like this man need to wake up and smell the coffee. He never caused chemical attacks on his people. You believe that cause the news is your only source of information. Fox News and BBC News are polluting your mind. Your quick to blame Assad for the attacks. Maybe ISIS or maybe even Syrian Rebels did the attacks. Please expand your research. .

Napolitano Put On Ice By Fox For Reporting British Intelligence Spied On Trump For Obama

Screen Shot 2017-03-21 at 4.04.19 PM

By  Rick Wells

If you work for CNN, NBC, NYT or any of the mainstream media propagandists and base a story upon anonymous sources, three of them, which are credible, you’d be considered to have a reliable basis for  reporting the story. If you’re a conservative or worse, a libertarian, and you work for Fox you get put in the doghouse with a full bowl and water with a instructions to listen for the whistle, they’ll call you some day.

Andrew Napolitano has been too honest before, losing his own show on Fox after broadcasting his “What if you were silenced” video on his Freedom Watch program. Two other programs were cancelled at the same time, perhaps for cover, perhaps for ratings as the network claims.

Now he’s been put out to pasture for his report that cited three intelligence sources as having confirmed that British Intelligence, GCHQ, had done the dirty work for Obama. The report alleges they were spying on President Trump while he was still a candidate and after the election, secretly funneling Obama the info in order to keep him out of the loop of blame and scrutiny.

We all know about Obama’s legendary honesty, the story about him saying “I cannot tell a lie” and admitting he had chopped down the marijuana plant is just one example. He would never target political enemies and would never lie to the American people. If he says he didn’t spy on President Trump, we have to take him at this word.

The LA Times reported that people familiar with the situation [more anonymous sources but it’s a liberal paper so it’s fine], who spoke only on the condition of anonymity, said Judge Napolitano is not expected to be on  Fox airwaves any time soon. In  their report they fault Napolitano for saying the British “Government Communications Headquarters, ‘most likely’ provided Obama with transcripts of Trump’s recorded calls.” He also wrote in a column for, “By bypassing all American intelligence services, Obama would have had access to what he wanted with no Obama administration fingerprints.”

Of course it’s a difficult charge to prove, as the White House is finding out. Thats particularly true when the entire intelligence community is working against you, as well as the bulk of the media and the globalist ownership at Fox. Naturally, the British spy agency has denied the claims, saying they are “utterly ridiculous and should be ignored.” But it’s early, leaks happen, and they can happen to benefit the President as well.

Fox News did not respond to inquiries about Napolitano’s status Monday but the LA times noted that the judge was conspicuously absent from the network’s coverage of the confirmation hearings for Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. That is the type of event in which he typically would have played a significant role. He has not been on air since Thursday.

Judge Napolitano did not crawl into the doghouse with his tail between his legs. A statement he authored was read on Sunday’s “MediaBuzz” program in which Judge Napolitano defended his comments. He said he “reported what the sources told me, reported it accurately and I do believe the substance of what they told me.”

Interestingly, during Comey’s testimony on Monday in House Intelligence Committee hearings, he stated that Obama would never make such a request to GCHQ because it would be “expressly against the construct” of intelligence agreements between the U.S. and its allies.”

Tell us, Director Comey, why a criminal illegal alien who squatted for eight years in our White House, who tramples upon the Constitution every chance he gets, would care about an intelligence agreement between different factions of the White Infidel power structure. And how is it that you know what he would or would not do, what is taking place in the septic tank between his ears? Maybe it doesn’t matter, we know Democrats and their operatives will say or do anything as long as it benefits them politically.