Shepard Ambellas: ‘They don’t want Americans to own firearms, they want all Americans to be slaves’

By Lexi Morgan

(INTELLIHUB) — While the leftist-backed full-court press pushes to take away firearms from law-abiding U.S. citizens using Operation Mockingbird talking points, scripted questions and answers, several issues come to mind, radio talk show host and founder of Intellihub Shepard Ambellas explained on his show Wednesday.

“As with the Parkland school shooting we see David Hogg and other students who’ve jumped on the bandwagon with CNN and other media outlets, basically all of the leftist outlets, they are lining up with the Democrats the whole democratic agenda to take away and limit firearms in America,” the talk show host said. “They don’t want Americans to be able to own firearms, they basically want all Americans to be slaves and that’s what the Democrats ideology is on this.”

Ambellas went on to explain how hypocritical this all is by pointing out that the Democrats ultimately want to be protected by armed security or the Secret Service themselves.


“When you really think about it, they want to be protected,” he explained. “They want to be heavily secured, all of their stuff is heavily fortified, all of them run around with bullet-proof cars, the Democrats, the senators, the congressman, you know, anyone in that circle or in those circles, democrat or republican.”

“They run around, they are fully secured with firearms, their Secret Service, their security are all fully-armed but yet they want to be able to take the firearms out of the hands of the citizens so that the citizens in the United States of American absolutely cannot defend themselves against their tyranny, see that’s the thing.”

The outspoken talk show host made clear that the elites don’t like the fact that millions of firearms are floating around in the hands of Americans.

“They are outnumbered and they don’t like to feel outnumbered,” Ambellas said. “That’s why the Constitution was put in place to begin with and now they are infringing upon it, they have already infringed upon it in a number of places.”

According to Ambellas, the PATRIOT Act was written over 10-years in advance, was authored primarily by Joe Biden, and was rolled out right after the September 2001 attacks, as planned.

“They use the Hegelian dialect, they use problem-reaction-solution scenarios which they create and orchestrate through covert paramilitary operations, rogue CIA operations, rogue joint-Bush CIA operations, of course, in conjunction with the Saudi’s and what they do is just generate these problems,” he explained. “They generate the crisis and then they offer the solution and the solution they’ve offered us all is safety since 9/11.”

The Shepard Ambellas Show airs weekdays (Mon-Fri) @ 9 pm Eastern/8C on American Freedom Radio go to to listen to the latest episode.

©2018. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.


Group will not be required to reveal its donors


March For Our Lives, a demonstration involving survivors of the Parkland school shooting that will take place Saturday in Washington, D.C., and across the country, registered a 501(c)(4) nonprofit advocacy organization that is not required to disclose its donors.

The March for Our Lives Action Fund, a 501(c)(4) “social welfare” nonprofit organization, was registered on March 8 with the D.C. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, records show. The action fund lists its business address in Encino, Calif., and its agent as CT Corporation System, a D.C.-based firm that offers agent, incorporation, and corporate business compliance services.

Jeri Rhodes, an associate executive secretary for finance and administration at the Friends Committee on National Legislation, a group that “lobbies Congress and the administration to advance peace, justice, opportunity, and environmental stewardship,” is also listed as the action fund’s executing officer and governor on its registration. Rhodes previously served as chief financial officer for Greenpeace.

While the organization said on its website it is “for kids and by kids” and the “March For Our Lives organizers are the kids themselves,” it also said the kids “have brought in support to help ensure it is a success.”coalition of liberal advocacy groups are currently involved in organizing and planning the march. In addition to support from leading gun-control groups like Everytown for Gun Safety, the Brady Campaign, and Giffords, organizers from the Women’s March, Planned Parenthood, and Move On are involved with the permitting for the event as well as promoting it.

March For Our Lives is even directing donations to Everytown, which has set up a March For Our Lives Initiative under their own 501(c)(3) operation. Donations to that fund will be tax deductible, and its donors will have to be publicly disclosed.

However, the March For Our Lives Action Fund, as a 501(c)(4) organization, will not be required to disclose its donors, and individuals who send cash to the group can remain anonymous. A 501(c)(4) designated group can be involved in political activity as long as it does not become its primary focus. The organization said on its website it chose to incorporate the group this way because it plans to lobby for new gun-control legislation even after Saturday’s march.

“March for Our Lives Action Fund is tax-exempt under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code,” it said. “Unlike section 501(c)(3) charitable organizations which have restrictions on their lobbying activities, section 501(c)(4) organizations are permitted to conduct unlimited lobbying for federal tax purposes. This form of entity gives the students maximum flexibility to conduct high-impact legislative advocacy during the Day of Action and beyond.”

They said the donations being made to the group now will be used to cover expenses for the march and also future lobbying efforts.

“Donations to the March For Our Lives Action Fund will cover all expenses associated with the march taking place in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, March 24th,” the site said. “The funds will also be used to fight for comprehensive gun safety legislation at the local, state, and federal level, and will also include voter education, ballot initiatives, and lobbying state legislatures and Congress to protect America’s kids.”

Despite the anonymous nature of the group’s funding, there is some information on who has given money to the group thus far because a number of celebrities have announced their own donations publicly. Oprah Winfrey, George Clooney, Steven Spielberg, and Jeffrey Katzenberg have each donated $500,000. The fashion company Gucci has also publicly announced their own half-million-dollar donation. Those publicly disclosed donations total $2.5 million.

The group also announced that the proceeds from the GoFundMe fundraiser, which raised $3.3 million in the immediate aftermath of the Parkland shooting, would be split between a separate fund that will help financially support the families of the victims and the March For Our Lives Action Fund. It is unclear how much money the Action Fund has raised since the GoFundMe fundraiser was ended and the group switched to raising money through The Action Network, a fundraising platform designed to assist progressive causes. The group won’t be required to file financial disclosures for several months.

Rhodes and March for Our Lives did not immediately return a request for comment.

Liberal media didn’t think data mining was so bad when Obama’s campaign did it

Campaigns of President Trump and President Obama reportedly used similar data mining practices but received drastically different reactions.

By Brian Flood

The left is outraged that President Trump’s campaign used data mining to win the 2016 election – but neither the media nor Democrats seemed to mind when President Obama’s team did the same thing.

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro penned a column for The Hill on Tuesday headlined, “What’s genius for Obama is scandal when it comes to Trump,” which outlined the differences in the way similar news was covered during contrasting administrations.

Shapiro surfaced a 2012 report from The Guardian that proclaimed Obama’s reelection team was mining data through Facebook to target specific voters. The Guardian is also the publication that reported on political data analytics company Cambridge Analytica and its ties to Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Cambridge Analytica is accused of harvesting data to build profiles on 50 million Facebook users, who agreed to fill out a survey, in an attempt to help Team Trump target specific voters with ads and stories.

Shapiro noted that Facebook didn’t object when Obama’s team used tactics similar to what Trump’s campaign employed, noting that a former Obama campaign staffer recently admitted Facebook didn’t try to stop Obama’s 2012 re-election team because the company wanted him to win.

Obama’s campaign built a database of every American voter using the same Facebook developer tool used by Cambridge, known as the social graph API, according to the Washington Post. This technology allowed the Obama campaign to access information of voters to figure out “which people would be most likely to influence other people in their network to vote,” according to the paper.

“Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing,” ex-Obama campaign staffer Carol Davidsen tweeted on Sunday from her verified account.

“As soon as Facebook realized that Cambridge Analytica had pursued a similar strategy, they suspended the firm.”

– Ben Shapiro

Davidsen said that Facebook was candid and revealed that the company allowed the Obama campaign to do things it wouldn’t have allowed someone from the opposing sideto get away with.

“Not so with Trump. As soon as Facebook realized that Cambridge Analytica had pursued a similar strategy, they suspended the firm,” Shapiro wrote. “This isn’t surprising. Since Trump’s election, Democrats — in search of a rationale for their favored candidate’s defeat — have blamed a bevy of social media outlets.”

Facebook has agreed to brief House Judiciary Committee staff as soon as Wednesday following the fallout over Cambridge Analytica’s use and exploitation of user data from some 50 million people. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been under fire for remaining silent on the issue, but Axios reported that he may finally break his silence.

“Zuckerberg plans to speak out in the next 24 hours on the data-harvesting revelations that have hammered his stock price, inflamed lawmakers in D.C. and Europe, and trapped his social network in a crisis of trust,” Axios’ Mike Allen wrote on Wednesday.

A glowing 2012 Time article about the data mining was used by Obama staffers was headlined, “Friended: How the Obama Campaign Connected with Young Voters,” and went on to explain how social networks are changing the way modern, sophisticated politicians campaign. “By 2016, this sort of campaign-driven sharing over social networks is almost certain to be the norm,” the article stated.

Headlines tying the 2016 Trump campaign to data mining have been strikingly different.

The New York Times wrote, “How Trump consultants exploited the Facebook Data of millions,” while liberal cable news pundits have agonized over the news.

“When Obama was exploiting Facebook users to help win re-election, it was an act of political genius. When Trump attempted something similar, with unclear results, it’s a travesty of democracy and further evidence that somehow he stole the election,” the editorial board of Investor’s Business Daily concluded.

Meanwhile, Shapiro doesn’t even think the “supposedly nefarious workings” of data mining by the Trump campaign influenced the outcome of the election.

“It didn’t win Trump the election, by the way. Trump won the election because Hillary was an unbelievably crappy candidate and Trump campaigned in the right places,” Shapiro said on Tuesday. “It’s just nonsense.”

Facebook ‘hypocrites’ working against online privacy law – campaigner

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, FILE PHOTO. © Stephen Lam

Tech giants including Facebook and Google are pumping millions of dollars into halting new laws in California which would expand online privacy protections. Campaigners hope this week’s revelations will force a Facebook climbdown.

As Facebook’s share price tumbled this week following the Cambridge Analytica debacle the the chief supporter of the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 accused the Silicon Valley behemoth, and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg, of being two faced.

READ MORE: #DeleteFacebook trending as users fume over Cambridge Analytica data harvesting scandal

“Right now, Facebook’s money is saying something different than what they are telling the world,” Alastair Mactaggart said. In an open letter to Zuckerberg, Mactaggart says he was disappointed to learn Facebook is pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars into efforts to defeat the act.

Last month Facebook joined Google, Comcast, Verizon and AT&T in contributing more than $1 million to a political action committee set up to oppose the measure, the LA Times reports.

The act would require companies to disclose what personal information from Californians tech companies could collect, buy or share. It would allow consumers to “opt out” from those practices and would prevent businesses from charging a higher price to those who make that choice.


It would also give civilians power to file civil lawsuits after a data breach or for selling their personal information.

“Something’s not adding up here,” Mactaggart wrote. “You have claimed the Cambridge Analytica data breach was not a breach, and that you do not sell users’ personal information—but either it was a breach, or a sale.  If not a breach, we are forced to conclude that Facebook sold Cambridge Analytica access to over 50 million users’ personal information, most of whom NEVER consented to having their personal information shared.”

The privacy campaigner said Facebook needs to be honest with its users and shareholders about what information was collected, sold or breached in the Cambridge Analytica case. He also called on it to come clean about its opposition to the California Consumer Privacy Act.


LAWLESS: Philadelphia’s New Soros Backed DA Launches Plan To Keep More People Out Of Jail

Far left billionaire George Soros has been pouring huse amounts of cash into district attorney races all over the country. One of his candidates won in Philadelphia and is already pushing for much more lax law enforcement.

The goal of Soros in these races is beginning to come into focus.

The Daily Wire reports:

Philly’s New Soros-Backed D.A. Rolls Out Policies To Keep People Out Of Jail

Larry Krasner, Philadelphia’s new district attorney who was backed by billionaire George Soros, recently rolled out sweeping policy changes “to end mass incarceration and bring balance back to sentencing” in the City of Brotherly Love.

The progressive Democrat issued a memo to 300 assistant DAs last Tuesday outlining several bold reforms crafted to reduce the number of people in jail. The procedural shifts instruct prosecutors to stop charging people for possession of marijuana, seek lighter sentences with plea deals, and directs them to obtain approval from supervisors before requesting more punitive penalties…

“Pennsylvania’s and Philadelphia’s over-incarceration have bankrupted investment in policing, public education, medical treatment of addiction, job training and economic development — which prevent crime more effectively than money invested in corrections,” wrote Krasner, who had never prosecuted a criminal case before taking office two months ago.

Sounds like the new DA in Philadelphia cares more about the rights of criminals than the city’s law abiding citizens. Anyone surprised?