Three Major Media Companies EXPOSED For Their Liberal Bias


By S.P. Palermo

Control the media and you control the narrative.

For years, liberals held sway over news the American people received, until FOX and conservative talk radio invaded their power base and busted their monopoly. Unable to vanquish their opposition and regain their totalitarianism, the mainstream media have let slowly slip the mask of impartiality.

At times they outright admit their bias (“You’re Goddamned right I ordered the Code Red!”), but for the most part they choose to ignore it, parading under a pretense of impartiality, like the Emperor and his new clothes. On any given night you can turn to CNN and see a panel of six guests comprised of two far left progressives, two garden variety liberals, one Stealth Democrat posing as a RINO and a lone conservative (for a network that claims to be against bullying they seem to have no problem with a five-against-one format.) And the lone conservative is often a woman (which party has a war on women?) Because a five-to-one advantage isn’t enough, the six guests are presided over by one of the ringmasters from CNN’s stable of liberal hosts (or does anyone believe that Cooper, Cuomo, Costello, Wolf or Lemon have ever voted for a single candidate with an R next to their name in their entire lives?)

But now, CNN and the rest of their ilk have a new ally in their struggle to manage the meme: Social Media, or to be more accurate as we’ve recently learned, Socialist Media.

In a not-so-stunning, and certainly not unsuspected turn of events, Facebook, Google and Twitter have all been outed as progressive proselytizers, part of the Global Gang (or is it Goebbels’ Gang?).

In the past two weeks alone we’ve seen:

FACEBOOK outed for suspending a “Transgenders for Trump” page (hyperlink #1, below)

GOOGLE caught manipulating search results to bury negative stories about Hillary Clinton (link #2)

TWITTER levying multiple suspensions on gay, conservative firebrand columnist Milo (link #3)

What prompted this open bias against Milo and Transgenders by Twitter and Facebook?

What was their sin – hate speech? Death threats?


Socialist Media is trying to silence them because they present a case for a Republican candidate in a world where the  has been indoctrinated to vote for Democrats.

In short, they were suspended for encouraging independent thought, which is anathema to the political party dependent on Group Think.

Naturally, all three, Google, Facebook and Twitter have denied any bias.

Just like the networks used to.

Lest anyone think it’s a two-way street, where progressives face the same kind of filtering of free speech, consider this – if you’d like, you can go to Facebook’s “Donald Trump Sucks” page” where you can engage in insightful political discourse with your typical, anti-hate speech, safe-space-demanding leftist as they gather around (be warned the image is NSFW) pictures like this.

Or, if you prefer variety in your barbarism, you can go to Twitter and share your thoughts with followers of the religion of peace as they broadcast their desires to bomb, decapitate and sodomize Milo (Probably in reverse order of that. I think.)

As for Google, I can share a personal experience. Fed up with the hypocrisy of the left’s attacks on Trump for banning the Washington Post, I decided to present a counterpoint utilizing the three media outlets Obama banned towards the end of his initial campaign to fundamentally change the America his wife was so proud (not) of. I couldn’t recall who they were (it was the Dallas Morning News, the Washington Examiner and the NY Post) so I went to google and entered “media outlets banned by Obama.”

What did I get?

If you guessed page after page of articles attacking Trump for banning the Washington Post you are correct!

Serves me right for turning to Socialist Media when I needed facts.

Link #1

Link #2

Link #3

Google is Recording Audio of Everything You Say With “OK Google” Voice Search

Published on Jun 8, 2016

~)) Subscribe ((~ now for more! If you use the voice search feature on Android phones, then OK Google has recorded your voice and everything you’ve searched for. It likely has recorded other things you didn’t realize as well. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story. © 2016 by Mark Dice

Colin Cobb

good thing I don’t even use it lol
Stand4 Liberty

Is time to boycott Jewish owned Google.
Steven Wheeler

Mark, It is worse than you think. The problem isn’t just that it can accidentally be activated and listen to what you’re saying. It is always listening. Of course, it is always listening or how else would it hear you say “ok google” ? I went to check my voice search history to confirm this and indeed, it plays part of what I was saying BEFORE I ever said “ok google” So it isn’t just listening after you say ok google, it is listening ALWAYS. Make sense? +Mark Dice
Nacho ZombieKilla

This is true and has happened to me hundreds of times and I don’t even use Google voice app. Many times when I pick up the phone the Google voice app is actively listening and that’s without even touching the phone. No way to force stop it that I can find.
MGTOW Survivalist

Google has a file two foot thick of every time I say nigger.

Thats why I just shout out random antisemetic statements when Im near my phone.
Danielle Siena T

I had nothing on my search history… I’ve never said OK Google…you literally have to say that right?


Screen Shot 2016-06-06 at 12.25.17 PM

The Taschenbergpalais Hotel is located just south of the river, in Dresden’s historic city centre, the “Innere Altstadt”:

Screen Shot 2016-06-06 at 12.26.04 PM


As the EU referendum looms, a great counsel of war is gathering. Henri de Castries, the Chairman of the influential Bilderberg Group, has made his way to the highest hill above Dresden, placed a mighty conch shell to his aristocratic French lips and blown.

Responding to his call, 140 or so of the most powerful pro-European business leaders and politicians will be making their way to the five-star Hotel Taschenbergpalais to discuss the future of their beloved free trade zone.

The annual three-day Bilderberg conference kicks off on Thursday, and you can be sure the mood in Dresden will be a grim one. The heads of Google, Shell, BP and Deutsche Bank will be there, and Brexit will be top of the agenda. The Bilderberg Group has been nurturing the EU to life since the 1950s, and now they see their creation under dire threat.

“A disaster for everyone” is how Henri de Castries, the boss of AXA and a director of HSBC, describes Brexit. But in particular, it is a disaster for his banking and big business colleagues at Bilderberg. Thomas Enders, the CEO of Airbus, who sits on Bilderberg’s steering committee – the group’s governing body – said, in a recent interview with CNBC, that his industry would be “lobbying” against Brexit.

Enders said: “Long-term it would not be positive certainly for the industry. This why the aerospace industry – I think amongst others – will lobby… for a [Remain] vote of the British electorate on the EU.”

For Bilderberg, as for Goldman Sachs, the idea that there might be any kind of push-back against globalisation is a horrific one.

Goldman Sachs has two senior representatives on Bilderberg’s steering committee: James A. Johnson, a board member of the bank, and Robert Zoellick, the chairman of Goldman Sachs’ board of international advisors. We know from Charity Commission accounts that Goldman Sachs, along with BP, is one of the key funders of the group, and we also know that they’ve been pumping “a substantial six-figure sum” into the Remain campaign. And Goldman Sachs doesn’t spend money lightly. The Remain campaign is clearly close to whatever they have instead of a heart.

Protesters at the 61st annual Bilderberg Meeting in London, 2013.Getty Images

For Bilderberg, as for Goldman Sachs, the idea that there might be any kind of push-back against globalisation is a horrific one. I suspect we’ll glimpse some frowning faces behind the tinted glass as the limousines start rolling up on Thursday.

An integrated EU, with the City at its centre, is a key building block in a globalised world, and its potential loss is a huge concern for “the high priests of globalisation”, as Will Hutton called the members of Bilderberg. The prospect of Brexit “frightens me“, admit Ken Jacobs, the head of Lazard, and another member of Bilderberg’s inner circle. Not much frightens these people. Only two things: sunlight and Brexit.

Charlie Skelton will be tweeting from Dresden on @deyook.


Social media censoring anti-globalist speech to transform real nations into on-line Oceania

MAY 31, 2016

Facebook and Twitter are censoring free speech, Bloomberg reported in an article which downplayed what’s really going on: the hijacking of the Internet to destroy national identity, culture and the free exchange of ideas in favor of an 1984-style virtual superstate.

In the article linked on the Drudge Report, Bloomberg revealed how Facebook and Twitter are working with the European Union to ban on-line commentators from spreading “hate speech,” but Bloomberg watered down the news so badly it made censorship sound like a great idea.

So let’s break down the Bloomberg article to reveal what’s really going on. From the article:

U.S. Internet giants Facebook Inc., Twitter Inc., Google and Microsoft Corp. pledged to tackle online hate speech in less than 24 hours as part of a joint commitment with the European Union to combat the use of social media by terrorists.

First off, the European Union is an unelected oligopoly designed to operate as a superstate which overrides the national sovereignty of its member countries.

As economist Ryan McMaken with the Mises Institute points out:

The EU, of course, is an anti-democratic organization, which one speaker in the film notes is designed to be nearly totally insulated from the will of the voters in the member countries. The EU is run not by political appointees and the unelected European Commission. The European Parliament is powerless to stop or repeal the acts of the Commission. A conglomeration of dozens of faceless, secretive commissions, offices, and ministries, the EU is a bureaucrat’s paradise where powerful people remain largely anonymous and safe to carry out their endless array of schemes without any fear of retribution from the voters anywhere. Virtually no one can name any of the most powerful people in the EU, whether one of the EU’s five presidents, or other powerful members of the EU organizations.

In other words, unelected, anonymous bureaucrats will decide what constitutes “hate speech,” which to them is anything that doesn’t fit into their agenda to gain more power over the population.

But let’s continue with the Bloomberg article:

Beyond national laws that criminalize hate speech, there is a need to ensure such activity by Internet users is “expeditiously reviewed by online intermediaries and social media platforms, upon receipt of a valid notification, in an appropriate time-frame,” the companies and the European Commission said in a joint statement on Tuesday.

The way Bloomberg paraphrases this quote is strange; it’s almost as if they want you to agree with it.

But who are these “online intermediaries” that will help EU bureaucrats eradicate “hate speech?”

Well, in Feb. Twitter announced it was organizing a “Trust & Safety Council” with feminist and Islamic groups to “prevent abuse, harassment, and bullying,” which, of course, leads to mass censorship.

The organizations taking part on the council include Feminist Frequency, GLAAD and even an Islamic advocacy group.

“Most of the groups listed are merely collections of people with an axe to grind, and my, how the lefties do love their acronyms,” a commenter at the Free Republic stated. “They also love their oxymorons: ‘outreach’ and ‘shutting down expression’ are a contradiction in terms yet Twitter is determined to conflate them and to enforce that conflation.”

To sum it up, this war on “hate speech” is nothing more than a program to control not only what people say but also what they think.

“No matter how implausible an idea [open borders, gun control, global government, etc.] may seem, it can gain acceptance in the minds of the citizens as the forces of PC relentlessly hype the idea in the public square [such as Facebook or Twitter],” former intelligence officer Stella Morabitorevealed, with my own comments added for context. “Simultaneously, the voices that might challenge and analyze the idea must be suppressed — accusations of bigotry and hatred often do the trick — so that the PC idea has a chance to incubate and then affect public opinion.”

And that’s it in a nutshell: Facebook and Twitter are working with globalist bureaucrats and their “social justice warrior” puppets to sway public opinion on their virtual, one-world “empire” that would ultimately erase the importance of real nation-states.

Facebook in particular is already a virtual “nation” ran by “dictator” Mark Zuckerberg that influences its “citizens” – Facebook users – to believe what it wants them to believe by suppressing libertarian viewpoints and independent media in general.

And both Facebook and Twitter, which now represent a large portion of the Internet, are encouraging users to give up their own national identities in favor of globalism; it’s already bad enough that many of the world’s languages are going extinct as more and more people simply speak English due to the Internet.

You also have Twitter dumbing language down by forcing people to speak in 140 characters or less, despite the fact that computer storage space (hard drive cost per gigabyte) is the cheapest it’s ever been.

That doesn’t really encourage intelligent discourse now, does it? I mean, was the Declaration of Independence less than 140 characters? The Magna Carta?

But that’s the point: the people are easier to control when they’re dumbed down and spending all their energy on social media instead of attacking the status quo.

“This whole social media stuff is bogus,” Matt Drudge said. “Facebook has two billion users? This is garbage, this is designed to demoralize the individual.”

“…I’m just warning this country: don’t get into this false sense that you are an individual when you’re on Facebook,” he added. “No you’re not; you’re a pawn in their scheme.”

ISIS Hackers Post ‘Kill’ List Of State Dept Employees…

Pro-ISIS Hackers Post “Kill” List Of State Department Employees

Dozens of names were distributed on the messaging app Telegram
By Gilad Shiloach

Hackers with a pro-ISIS group calling themselves the United Cyber Caliphate distributed a “kill” list on Monday that appears to include dozens of U.S. government personnel, Vocativ discovered.

The list features 43 names of people linked to the State Department, the Department of Homeland Security and the departments of defense, energy, commerce and health and services. It also identifies the U.S. embassies in Santiago and Kathmandu—as well as the Department of the Navy in Gulfport, Mississippi—as targets. It includes someone who appears to have worked for Australia’s Department of Defence.

While the group’s intentions are sinister, it’s unlikely that the so-called hack unveils much new or actionable information. The hackers list phone numbers with each person—many of which are general numbers for institutions or offices, though several appear to be correct, current office lines. The group also posted zip codes and cities—often listed as Washington, D.C.—allegedly affiliated with their targets, but no specific home or work addresses.

The information for each target was shared on individual photoshopped images posted on the Telegram group of the United Cyber Caliphate.  “Wanted to be killed” was written in English, Arabic, Spanish, Russian and French below every image, which also included the hacking group’s name and the logo for U.S. embassies.

Much of the information listed by the group is publicly available. Vocativ was able to verify that at least several of the people listed have worked for the U.S. government in various locations, including at U.S embassies in Lome, Togo and Khartoum, Sudan. In one case, a first name was listed without a last name. One name was listed three times.

Still, the Islamic State’s message was clear: “USA—You are our primary goal,” the hacking group posted in an English-language message on Telegram. “Your system failed to Tackling [sic] our attacks. Now we will Crush you again.”

Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 12.35.11 PM

The so-called United Cyber Caliphate is a new alliance of pro-ISIS hackers consisting of three hacking groups, including the well-known Cyber Caliphate Army. Vocativ previously found that members of the Cyber Caliphate Army released target lists of current and former U.S. government officials, as well as kill lists of cops from Minnesota—though no known attacks originated from those past hacks. The same group has also falsely claimed to hack Google.

Michael Savage Calls for “Constitutionalist” Ted Cruz to Call Out Rigged Colorado GOP Election!

Aired on April 11, 2016 – Michael Savage Calls for “Constitutionalist” Ted Cruz to Call Out Rigged Colorado GOP Election!


Absolutely SPOT ON Dr. Savage! I am so disgusted at how crooked US politics has become..
Jim Morales


Lyin’ Ted.

Lyin Ted, Cruz is a hypocrite dirt bag on every level…
Rocky Cheesman


Savage is 100% right wake up people !
Mary Herrera

Tom Paine

rome is burning folks,civil war is coming ,long over due
J Stevens

Do I smell an insurrection coming?
mark toney

If we can’t vote the GOP should lose their Tax Exempt status. Also the use of Government facilities for their Primary should be revoked!



Ride-sharing company admits to complying with roughly 85 percent of requests from law enforcement

Ride-sharing company Uber admitted Tuesday to giving data on more than 12 million of its users to multiple U.S. government agencies.

According to the company’s first-ever transparency report, both U.S. law enforcement and regulators were provided with information on millions of users between July and December 2015 alone.

“Like other companies, we receive requests from law enforcement agencies for info,” rmation about our riders and drivers during the course of a criminal investigation or other emergency the report states.

Requests from law enforcement agencies at both the state and federal level included information on everything from pickup and drop-off locations to the identity of specific drivers and passengers.

“These agencies may request information about trips, trip requests, pickup and dropoff areas, fares, vehicles, and drivers in their jurisdictions for a given time period,” the company said.

Uber admits to complying with roughly 85 percent of requests from law enforcement, many of which they claim surrounded cases involving fraud and stolen credit cards. Only 15.4 percent of requests were withdrawn or produced no data.



None of the inquiries are believed to be related to national security since Uber did not receive “any requests issued under the provisions of national security statutes.”

Although its compliance rate was well over 80 percent, the company expressed concern over the amount and scope of requests by law enforcement.

“Of course regulators will always need some amount of data to be effective, just like law enforcement. But in many cases they send blanket requests without explaining why the information is needed, or how it will be used,” Uber wrote. “And while this kind of trip data doesn’t include personal information, it can reveal patterns of behavior—and is more than regulators need to do their jobs.”

“It’s why Uber frequently tries to narrow the scope of these demands, though our efforts are typically rebuffed.”

Other major tech companies including Google, Facebook and Twitter have also released similar reports in recent years to show users statistics on government requests.