Sessions Announces Crackdown on Sanctuary Cities…

By Stephen Dinan and Dave Boyer

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Monday he’ll begin punishing sanctuary cities, withholding potentially billions of dollars in federal money — and even clawing back funds that had been doled out in the past.

Speaking at the White House, Mr. Sessions said his department is preparing to dole out more than $4 billion in funds this year, but will try prevent any of it from going to sanctuaries.

“Countless Americans would be alive today … if these policies of sanctuary cities were ended,” Mr. Sessions said.

He said he’s carrying out a policy laid out by the Obama administration last year, which identified three grant programs — the COPS grants, Byrne grants and State Criminal Alien Assistance Program money — that already require sanctuary certification.

The Obama administration didn’t end up enforcing that policy, but Mr. Sessions said he’ll begin.

Sanctuaries are jurisdictions that thwart federal immigration agents’ efforts to deport illegal immigrants, usually be refusing to comply with detainer requests from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

More than 100 cities and counties were identified last week in ICE’s inaugural public name-and-shame list of sanctuaries.

Some of the sanctuaries refuse all communication with ICE, saying they want no part of helping deport anyone. But other jurisdictions say they’re concerned about the legal implications of holding someone for ICE agents, and say federal agents’ requests aren’t good enough.

On Friday ICE issued a new detainer form, replacing a jumble of forms that had emerged under the Obama administration. ICE’s new single form allows agents to demand notification when a potential deportee is about to be released from custody, and also asks that the target person he held for up to 48 hours so agents can get there to pick the person up.

The notification requirement is controversial with only a handful of the most strident sanctuaries, but the 48-hour hold is more problematic.

The National Sheriffs’ Association said it was looking for a clearer policy statement from Mr. Sessions.

“Until the Department of Justice issues legal guidance confirming the constitutionality of current detainers, sheriffs will remain exposed to legal and ethical ramifications,” Jonathan Thompson, executive director of the association, said last week.

Archdiocese of Mexico City: Collaborators on Trump Wall ‘Traitors to their Country’

Screen Shot 2017-03-27 at 10.49.53 AM

By Thomas D. Williams, PH.D.

In a powerfully worded editorial, the Catholic archdiocese of Mexico City has condemned all companies and individuals who would work on Donald Trump’s border wall, calling them “immoral” and “traitors to their country.”

The unsigned editorial titled “Treason to the Homeland” appeared in Sunday’s edition of Desde la Fe, the weekly magazine of the Archdiocese of Mexico.

Pulling no punches, the op-ed savages the U.S. President, calling him a “fanatic” who is intent on constructing a “monument to intimidation and silence, hatred and xenophobia.”

As harsh as its denunciation of Trump may be, however, the article is directed at Mexicans who are willing to work on the wall. What is regrettable, the piece states, is that “on this side of the border, Mexicans are ready to collaborate with a fanatical project that annihilates the good relationship and harmony of two nations that share a common border.”

The article states that in recent days, more than 500 Mexican companies have expressed interest in contracts to participate in “the construction of the wall of ignominy,” by providing cement, materials, lighting and paint.

“With the fine justification of being companies that generate jobs, these companies seek to make a profit, regardless of the consequences, and consolidate their presence in the industry they exploit.”

For these companies, “the end justifies the means,” it reads.

The result, the piece adds, is that the “investment of Mexican companies in the wall will end up nurturing all those forms of discrimination that throughout history have subjected millions of human beings.”

The op-ed also takes issue with the Mexican government for its “lukewarmness” in dealing with Mexican businesses. In their short-sightedness, the piece continues, government officials fail to see that the wall is an “open threat” that violates social relations and peace and therefore has not taken legal action against these companies.

In an interesting twist, the op-ed states that “any deportation, when there is no proven crime and administrative failure justified according to law, is a sign of terror.”

It is entirely possible that the Archdiocese is unaware of Mexico’s own immigration policy and practices, which in most respects are stricter than those of the United States.

Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. In Article 118, the General Law on Population states that foreigners entering the country without the required documentation will be fined the equivalent of “20 to 100 days of established minimum salary.”

Article 125 adds that along with the stated fine, foreigners without legal documentation will be deported from the country.

According to the Pew Research Center, in 2015, the Mexican government “carried out about 150,000 deportations of unauthorized immigrants from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.”

The Mexican Archdiocese states that the border wall is a monument “to silence the voices of poorly paid and ill-treated workers, unprotected families and abused persons. It is a retreat from the noblest longings of mankind, for which much blood has been shed. It is a prelude to the destruction of the values of democracy and social rights.”

Moreover, the wall “represents the predominance of a country that considers itself good with the manifest destiny to crush a nationality that it has considered perverted and corrupt: the Mexican.”

The article concludes: “Any company that intends to invest in the wall of the fanatic Trump would be immoral, but above all, its shareholders and owners should be considered as traitors to their country.”

OUTRAGED Parents of Rockville, Maryland demand action against illegal immigrant crime

Published on Mar 25, 2017

Maryland intends to become a sanctuary state despite this situation.

 1John S

Do yourself all a favor. Get NRA trained, purchase a weapon for self defense. Learn it like the back of your hand and always in reach when out and about. You people are leading your everyone wins kids into the mouth of the dragon.
HX Video You’re 100 percent right.


Screen Shot 2017-03-22 at 6.21.55 PM

Tucker Carlson grills city lawmaker who enacted sanctuary city policies

| – MARCH 22, 2017

A Democrat city councilman drew comparisons between ICE agents carrying out immigration raids and Nazis during an interview concerning last week’s brutal rape of a 14-year-old girl at a Maryland school.

Baltimore councilman Zeke Cohen defended a recently enacted city resolution which blocks federal agents from enforcing deportation orders, arguing Baltimore is a “welcoming” city.

Cohen clarified his new sanctuary policy demands ICE agents target violent criminals for removal, such as those who committed the rape.

“But we only knew they were violent criminals after they had raped a ninth-grader,” Tucker tells Cohen.

“The fact is that at least one of them, possibly both, but at least one was in violation of the law already and because a lot of your state refuses to enforce federal immigration law he was able to commit that rape.”

“Wouldn’t it have been better to get him out of that school and out of this country before he raped this girl?” Carlson asked.

Cohen pivoted to discussing ICE’s recent deportation of an illegal immigrant Honduran father picked up by agents after dropping off his son at school.

“His only history is violating his status and returning to this country. He escaped violence in Honduras just the same way that my great grandmother escaped violence and persecution in Austria and we welcome him here,” Cohen said, adding, “Immigrants built the fabric of this country and Baltimore is a place that will continue to welcome them.”

Cohen had also previously compared immigration raids to the Holocaust in statements appearing in an article Monday on the City Paper.

“We lost a barber, a business owner and a father. They’re not gang members or drug dealers,” Cohen was quoted as saying. “They are like my grandmother who left everything behind, including a family who perished in the gas chambers.”

Tucker pointed out Cohen was criticizing laws which would have prevented the young girl’s rape, and essentially comparing fellow Americans tasked with enforcing immigration laws to the Nazis who killed millions of Jews.

“It’s pretty unbelievable that you would compare ICE, federal immigration authorities to the Nazis, which you just in effect did, and you did explicitly yesterday when their enforcing laws that would have prevented this heinous crime,” Carlson stated. “Would you say that to the parents of the girl who was raped? ‘These are Nazis, these Americans who were enforcing immigration laws.’ Why would you say some thing like that?”

Carlson was referring to the violent rape of a 14-year-old Rockville High School student last Friday who was sexually assaulted in a bathroom stall by two other students, including an 18-year-old illegal immigrant, in the middle of the school day.

The assault was described as a “terribly gruesome, violent, unconscionable attack” in a now-deleted tweet from ABC 7 news reporter Kevin Lewis.

Screen Shot 2017-03-22 at 6.28.02 PM

A local woman claimed the criminal act forced her to rethink her “bleeding heart liberal” political stance.


Screen Shot 2017-03-22 at 4.18.10 PM

Leftists use global body to break America’s sovereignty

| – MARCH 22, 2017

The human rights arm of the globalist Organization of American States (OAS) has conducted hearings aimed at opposing President Trump’s executive orders relating to immigration.

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), a “human rights watchdog” founded in 1959 under the charter of the globalist Organization of American States, conducted two hearings relating to President Trump’s immigration-related executive orders at the behest of advocacy groups.

Despite finding a sympathetic audience at the IACHR, the commissioners were unable to determine a proper course of action to oppose the orders.

“No way can the commission accept these acts of violations which are occurring, and which seem to be multiplying and becoming more and more serious,” said Margarette May Macaulay of Jamaica, first vice president of the IACHR. “We have a massive inhuman situation to deal with and we need all the help we can get.”

“You have to keep feeding us information.”

The first hearing was held to address the “impact of executive orders ‘Border Security and Immigration Enforcements Improvements;’ ‘Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist entry into the United States;’ and ‘Expediting Environmental Reviews and Approval for High Priority Infrastructure Projects on Human Rights in the United States.’”

The second hearing was held to discuss “policies that prevent access to asylum in the United States.”

Advocacy groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, American-Arab Anti Discrimination CommitteeJesuit Conference of Canada and the United States, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee ServiceNot1more Deportation, and the Immigration Clinic at the University of Texas Law School requested the two hearings.

“I urge the commission to hold the United States accountable. Please do not allow them to get away with this,” said Nicole Ramos, an immigration lawyer.

The Trump administration officially declined to send a representative to defend itself against the charges, arguing ongoing legal challenges to the orders make it “not appropriate” to defend them before the commission.

The decision to not send a representative was received with anger by the far-left advocacy groups who pushed for the hearings, most notably the ACLU, which said the decision “mirrors the behavior of authoritarian regimes.”

“Refusing to engage with the commission is an isolationist policy that mirrors the behavior of authoritarian regimes an will only serve to embolden them,” said Jamil Dakwar, director of the human rights program at the ACLU.

“This is another worrying sign that the Trump administration is not only launching an assault on human rights at home but is also trying to undermine international bodies charged with holding abusive governments accountable.”

It is perhaps a more worrying sign that the far-left are willing to cede America’s sovereignty to a globalist body that seeks to deny the United States the ability to maintain control of its borders.

Canadians want action on illegal immigration

Published on Mar 20, 2017

Brian Lilley reports the results of a poll on illegal immigration that confirm the majority of Canadians want the Trudeau Liberals to do something about it. MORE:…
Subscribe to the Rebel’s YouTube channel:
PLUS ***

The Petition
Justin Trudeau must uphold the common sense laws of Canada and respect the “Safe Third Country Agreement.”

Ken Stone

I think canada would be wise to deport Trudeau…….. You could do it in multiple parcels to save on shipping………

Canada is for Anglo, Celtic, Franco populations. Halt illegal and legal immigration or you wont exist in 30 years.

You’re fuckin right we do. Trudeaus government is a disgrace to all Canadians, left or right. Most people I know didn’t care who got elected. Not the case anymore.

Yes we do. Trudeau, being magnanimous with other peoples money is no recommendation. Our health system is falling apart and you and your globalist butt buddy soros just keep slamming them in. Don’t be surprised when Canadians start slamming back…bitch.
G Lewis

But but CBC tells me Canadians love illegal immigrants
MGTOW Psyche

We should send Justine Mohammed Trudeau to Syria

No action will be done. Trudeau is an idiot and none of this matters to him. He looks at it as more votes for the Libtards.
Tim Mac

That 36% and 37% is too high. Those dummies are immigrants and students. They need to educated as to what this all means. Those that feel they need to escape the USA are not the kind of people we want in Canada. My guess is that 100% of them will be a drain on Canada and no benefit whatsoever.

Maryland under siege after illegal reportedly assaults teen

Published on Mar 22, 2017

Mother of a girl murdered by an illegal immigrant shares her story

Pepito Rodriguez

The dems care more about the illegals than the American people… This is just insane, no laws in america
Amy Langera

Why aren’t the other MSM not covering this story as Fox News? Where is Madonna? Where are all the celebrities that think their voice has an impact? Where are the feminists???? Where are the women who organised and participated in the without women’s day?
Tommy DeVito

Why is a 18 yr old illegal savage in a 9th grade class to begin with? This falls on the school in my opinion. NOT ALL CULTURES ARE MEANT TO MIX. Diversity is not and has never been a strength of any nation.

thanks Obama
Waqar Zahid

We need to save America. We need to kick out every single illegal immigrants out of here. Be they Muslim, Mexican, or any other. We cannot let these illegals in here anymore, they are a constant threat to all Americans.

Democrats and the MSM will never talk about this story because illegals are their voter base. Cut funding to the Arts and all the non-essential bullshit we tax payers pay for and hire more ICE agents. Period!
Bisquiteen Trisket

Zero outcry by libtrash, not a peep when this happens. Hope the parents voted Hilldog. Retribution at its finest.

Democrats are a criminal organisation. That is why they support criminals and not the innocent victims of crime.