Michelle Ticked After Melania Steps Out With Bibi’s Wife And People Notice ONE Thing – I Have The Truth

By Mr. Wendal

First ladies of our country’s history have been synonymous with grace, and virtue, and just real elegance. Now, we have President Trump’s wife, Melania who just seems to ooze class and elegance with every step she takes.

She just seems to be a picture of sophistication, and it can’t just be the clothes.

It appears that there maybe a little bitterness after Melania stepped out with Benjamin Netanyahu’s wife on Wednesday, or so people are saying, when it comes to our former First Lady…but you can be the judge of that.

This afternoon First Lady Melania Trump, played hostess for the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife, Sara. While we have seen a President and first lady greet national leaders hundreds of times before–this was a first time for Melania.

Melania looked stunning in a custom-made Karl Lagerfeld white suit jacket and matching pencil skirt, and who take their eyes off of her.

Not only did Melania meet with Sara Netanyahu today she had the pleasure of entertaining Prime Minister of Japan‘s wife, Akie Abe, in Delray Beach, Florida this past weekend. Again, Melania stole the show looking absolutely gorgeous and poised as ever.

Let us compare that to when Michelle Obama met with these national leaders, and to be honest, Michelle can’t hold a candle next to Melania.

Seriously? This is what Michelle Obama wore to meet with a national leaders’ wife?

Or, when Michelle wore this frumpy gown when she was photographed with the Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe and his wife.

You know Michelle Obama is ticked after seeing these images of Melania floating around now. Melania’s beauty puts Michelle to shame, and First Lady Trump is putting class back in the White House. Michelle Obama lacked the poise and sophistication of a person in her position. Between her slouching and rough exterior she was not at all easy on the eyes.

Really all I care is that we are actually treating Israel like family again, and am looking forward the promises of protection, and unity our new President, President Trump is offering them…

It’s about time.

Read more: https://ihavethetruth.com/2017/02/16/michelle-ticked-after-melania-steps-out-with-bibis-wife-and-people-notice-one-thing/#ixzz4Yxqp54bb


Hillary’s Bimbo MARCH! Bill Shows Up, Where’s Rosie O’Donnell? (DC Women’s March 2017)

Linus Littlefield

Pathetic hypocrites literally looking like pussies.
serene sojourner

Cuts like a knife LOL cooch catillion.Apple sacs. You always teach me new verbage.
Ryan Manley

mad evol sinner

You never see Rosie or Michael Moore in the same room do ya?

Globalist Soros Exposed Funding Over 50 Organizations In Women’s March On DC

By Jay Syrmopoulos

An investigation by a New York Times affiliate has revealed that billionaire globalist financier, George Soros, who recently called Donald Trump a “would-be dictator” during an interview at Davos, and whose Open Society Foundation works to finance and forward progressive causes across the world, and is intimately connected to numerous color revolutions, the Arab Spring, and various other political uprisings across the globe, has been revealed to be connected to more than 50 of the groups that organized the nationwide “Women’s Marches” that saw millions of Americans take to the streets across the country.

The march’s official website says, “We stand together, recognizing that defending the most marginalized among us is defending all of us.” Many people turned out to be a manifestation of that ideal, but it’s important to understand the reality of what is happening on a strategic political level as an inorganic politically contrived and funded event. This, in no way, takes away from the validity of standing up for women’s issues but is important to note that women are being used as pawns in a larger ideological political game that has international overtones of power politics.

These marches were largely billed as “spontaneous” and “grassroots” actions, by publications like The Guardian and Vox. However, the reality exposed by an investigation by self-described liberal feminist, Asra Q. Nomani, writing for New York Times affiliate Women in the World, revealed that after studying the “funding, politics and talking points of the some 403 groups that are ‘partners’ of the march,” contrary to the non-partisan rhetoric used in these marches, they were not really “women’s march” but were rather “for women who are anti-Trump.”

Nomani reveals that the “Women’s Marches” were actually organized as political tools to be used to strategically forward a progressive political agenda against President Donald Trump — exposing the protests to largely be an organized, top-down driven political operation — and not an organic movement of concerned Americans taking to the streets as reported by the mainstream media.

According to Nomani’s Women in the World/New York Times report:

Following the money, I poured through documents of billionaire George Soros and his Open Society philanthropy, because I wondered: What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the “Women’s March”?

I found out: plenty.

By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment…Much like post-election protests, which included a sign, “Kill Trump,” were not “spontaneous,” as reported by some media outlets, the “Women’s March” is an extension of strategic identity politics that has so fractured America today, from campuses to communities. On the left or the right, it’s wrong. But, with the inauguration, we know the politics. With the march, “women” have been appropriated for a clearly anti-Trump day. When I shared my thoughts with her, my yoga studio owner said it was “sad” the march’s organizers masked their politics. “I want love for everyone,” she said.

The way Soros operates is as an “ideological philanthropist,” whose Open Society Foundation provides funding for organizations whose interests align with his own, and which blurs the line between political advocacy and social justice – thus being able to leverage selected/funded social justice organizations to affect political discourse.

This method is confirmed in a memo released by WikiLeaks, which was sent to Soros by Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. The Clinton campaign reveals the political motives behind using grassroots organizations to “control political discourse.” Podesta wrote to Soros that he wanted to “better utilize these networks to drive the content of politics through a strong echo chamber.”

Control the political discourse. So much effort over the past few years has been focused on better coordinating, strengthening, and developing progressive institutions and leaders. Now that this enhanced infrastructure is in place—grassroots organizing; multi-issue advocacy groups; think tanks; youth outreach; faith communities; micro-targeting outfits; the netroots and blogosphere—we need to better utilize these networks to drive the content of politics through a strong “echo chamber” and message delivery system.

Anyone familiar with the history of the Soros Open Society Foundations in Eastern Europe and around the world since the late 1980s, will know that his supposedly philanthropic “democracy-building” projects in Poland, Russia, or Ukraine in the 1990s allowed Soros the businessman to literally plunder the former communist countries’ wealth, according to the New Eastern Outlook.

A report in New Eastern Outlook revealed exactly how Sores-affiliated organizations across the world operate:

The totality of what is revealed in the three hacked documents show that Soros is effectively the puppet-master pulling most of the strings in Kiev. Soros Foundation’s Ukraine branch, International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) has been involved in Ukraine since 1989. His IRF doled out more than $100 million to Ukrainian NGOs two years before the fall of the Soviet Union, creating the preconditions for Ukraine’s independence from Russia in 1991. Soros also admitted to financing the 2013-2014 Maidan Square protests that brought the current government into power.

Soros’ foundations were also deeply involved in the 2004 Orange Revolution that brought the corrupt but pro-NATO Viktor Yushchenko into power with his American wife who had been in the US State Department. In 2004 just weeks after Soros’ International Renaissance Foundation had succeeded in getting Viktor Yushchenko as President of Ukraine, Michael McFaul wrote an OpEd for the Washington Post. McFaul, a specialist in organizing color revolutions, who later became US Ambassador to Russia, revealed:

Did Americans meddle in the internal affairs of Ukraine? Yes. The American agents of influence would prefer different language to describe their activities — democratic assistance, democracy promotion, civil society support, etc. — but their work, however labeled, seeks to influence political change in Ukraine.

Additionally, during the 2016 presidential cycle, Soros committed $25 million dollars to the 2016 campaign of Hillary Clinton. Per the standard Clinton operating procedure, this was indicative of the symbiotic relationship of favors between the billionaire and his array of political puppets across the globe.

Soros has often been accused of using his wealth to attempt to socially engineer the national domestic politics of entire states. He was accused of being connected to organizations that organized and funded the nationwide protests after the election of Donald Trump — a claim that Soros denies.

“There have been many false reports about George Soros and the Open Society Foundations funding protests in the wake of the U.S. presidential elections. There is no truth to these reports,” said a spokewoman from Soros’s Open Society Foundations in a statement, adding, “We support a wide range of organizations — including those that support women and minorities who have historically been denied equal rights. Many of whom are concerned about what policy changes may lie ahead. We are proud of their work. We of course support the right of all Americans to peaceably assemble and petition their government—a vital, and constitutionally safeguarded, pillar of a functioning democracy.”

Make no mistake that the events you’re seeing transpire nationwide are largely being coordinated, in part, by a billionaire political elite class that is looking to strategically forward a political agenda. Soros has used the same formula to foment domestic unrest to affect political goals in numerous nations –and it certainly looks as if he now has the United States in his sights. It’s clear that Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals is being employed by the left in an effort to destabilize and undermine political discourse in the U.S.

Women’s rights are unquestionably a human rights issues, not a political issue, which makes it disappointing that we, as free individuals, don’t organically create manifestations like these large-scale marches, without oligarchs and their vested political interests essentially making it happen as a means of forwarding their particular ideologically driven political agenda.


Gavin McInnes Street Fights His Way Past Urine And Feces Wielding Protestors At Deploraball

Published on Jan 20, 2017

Mike Howard

Tha Alphas are back in charge bitches!!!
Terrence Banton

They can’t stop Donald John Trump train is our president at 1200 pm the train arrives

it was wild punches , but the anarchist did deserved it. Gavin drunk lol
Nazmul Rabbi

That nasty short guy with the signboard about poverty gave me the creeps.

bring a baton and just beat the SHIT out of some protesters
Rusty Lionrek

those anarchists are really like apes. bet you they eat their shit just like actual apes.
Your Upper Lip

I knew Gavin wouldn’t be taking any shit at all.


The issue at hand was whether or not Rialto should become a “sanctuary city” for criminal illegal aliens

Chris Menahan Information LiberationJANUARY 19, 2017

An alt-left, Mexican supremacist with the ACLU told elderly white folks at a city council meeting in Rialto they should have no say in how the town their forefathers founded is governed because they’re a dwindling minority that only has “five years left.”

The issue at hand was whether or not Rialto should become a “sanctuary city” for criminal illegal aliens.

Elderly white Californians came out in droves to oppose the plan, while Luis Nolasco, “a community engagement and policy advocate for the ACLU of Southern California,” spoke in favor of it.

As The Daily Caller reports:

Nolasco said, “This is my town.”

He said that the important part of the sanctuary city discussion is “who are the people we are talking about.”

The ACLU official said that “the people in this room are not representative of Rialto. Sorry to break it, but growing up here white people were the minority.”

“The reality is that black and Latinos are the majority of the city, and that is representative of the city, and that’s going to continue to be the case for future generations,” Nolasco, 26, added.

The city of Rialto is 72.4 percent Latino, according to a 2015 Census estimate.

“It’s kind of mean for me to say it but these people have probably like five years left,” Nolasco said while gesturing to the white attendees at the meeting. A video of the meeting shows that several of them were elderly.

The ACLU official said that Latinos and blacks are “the future,” and that “we don’t want to see an America that is hateful.”

“Hateful,” simply means white.

The ACLU defended Nolasco statements, though they said they were not “consistent with [their] stated policy”:

The ACLU of Southern California told The Daily Caller Tuesday that Nolasco’s comments were not consistent with the ACLU’s stated policy but they support his right to freely express his opinion.

“Everyone in America has a Constitutional right to free speech, and the employees of the ACLU of Southern California are no exception. However, we wish to make clear that Luis Nolasco was not speaking on behalf of the ACLU at the Rialto City Council meeting and his statements are not consistent with our stated policy. Nevertheless, we support his right to freely express his personal opinion to his elected representatives,” the civil liberties group said.

According to his LinkedIn, Nolasco has been with the ACLU of Southern California since 2014 and is also the co-founder of the Inland Empire Immigrant Youth Coalition.

Imagine if a white person got up and said blacks and Hispanics should have no say in how their city is governed because they’re minorities.

They’d lose their jobs and be hounded by the media. The ACLU would look to file a suit against them.

Instead, since white people are the target, the ACLU defended Nolasco and acted as though the issue was whether or not he has “free speech.”

Bigger picture, this is “the Reconquista” movement in action, whereby the Southwestern United States is “reconquered” and turned back into Mexico.

Rather than being performed through an actual war, it’s simply being done through demographics. And as Luis Nolasco shows, it’s being done with utter contempt.

Former US/Mexico border.

“Hispanic share of the population by county, from 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2011.” [Via CityLab]

“Counties where the Hispanic population is now the largest in 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, 2011.”

Luis Nolasco’s comments make clear that Mexican supremacists like himself, who are fully backed by the ACLU and other globalist groups, have no interest in living peacefully together in a “multicultural,” “diverse” society. Rather, they view themselves as a conquering force here to retake “their” land from evil, “hateful” white people whose time is limited.



Published on Jan 19, 2017

As Infowars reporters arrived in DC they caught video of protestors being loaded on to busses.

Nova Day

They don’t stand a chance against THE WALL OF MEAT HAHAHA

plus the cop army, the 6,000 national guard/marines, 370 mercs, the secret service, and trump SUPPORTERS who are willing to hit back they start shit they are FUCKED
John Anderson

It’s going to be a sad, long trip back to reality.
Michael Baker

They need all the people they can get just to push Michael Moore’s fat az up capital hill in a wheel barrow!

drive that bus straight to the other side of the wall in Mexico….. And oh, Hit the nitro right before crossing the border.

Can someone please investigate the funding behind the Buses and protestors so that the public can clearly see who the true agitators are once and for all
Allie Fettig

Well, they have to feel like they’re doing something useful with their pathetic gutless lives.