JUDICIAL WATCH DUMPS EXPLOSIVE NEW FBI EMAILS FROM MCCABE’S CONFLICT REVIEW

Comey disregarded conflict of interest involving McCabe wife’s Senate campaign

Zero Hedge – NOVEMBER 22, 2017

Judicial Watch has just dumped a new treasure trove of FBI emails regarding Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s conflict check relative to the Clinton email investigation.

For those who missed it, we reviewed all of McCabe’s many scandals here: FBI Director McCabe Subject Of Three Separate Federal Inquiries Into Alleged Misconduct – Report

Ironically, this particular FOIA request was filed in October 2016 under the Obama administration but they apparently just “didn’t have time” to get to it.

Judicial Watch today released 79 pages of Justice Department documents concerning ethics issues related to FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s involvement with his wife’s political campaign. The documents include an email showing Mrs. McCabe was recruited for a Virginia state senate race in February 2015 by then-Virginia Lieutenant Governor Ralph Northam’s office.

The news that Clinton used a private email server broke five days later, on March 2, 2015. Five days after that, former Clinton Foundation board member and Democrat party fundraiser, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, met with the McCabes. She announced her candidacy on March 12. Soon afterward, Clinton/McAuliffe-aligned political groups donated nearly $700,000 (40% of the campaign’s total funds) to McCabe’s wife for her campaign.

Judicial Watch obtained the documents through a July 24, 2017, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed after the Justice Department failed to respond to an October 24, 2016, FOIA request.

Among other things, the new FOIA dump reveals a panicked FBI’s efforts to enlist the support of an army of lawyers and public relations personnel to deal with the original Wall Street Journal article (see: “Clinton Ally Aided Campaign of FBI Official’s Wife“) that first revealed McCabe’s ties to the Clintons and his simultaneous oversight of the Clinton email investigation.

But perhaps none of the newly revealed emails from Judicial Watch today are more important than the following one in which McCabe describes how FBI Director Comey was breifed on his ties to the Clintons just days before his wife announced her Senate bid (and subsequently received roughly $700,000 in political donations for Clinton-friendly PACs) and then confirmed that he “has no issue with it.”

An October 23, 2016, email shows McCabe running the response effort to a Wall Street Journal article that was published that day, titled “Clinton Ally Aided Campaign of FBI Official’s Wife.” McCabe provides Michael Kortan, the assistant director of Public Affairs, his version of a timeline of events surrounding the Clinton investigation and his wife’s campaign. McCabe said he contacted then-FBI Chief of Staff Chuck Roseburg about Jill McCabe’s candidacy and was told that “the D [Comey] has no issue with it.” (Judicial Watch earlier this month released documents showing that McCabe finally did recuse himself from the Clinton investigation only a week before last year’s presidential election.)
 
Internally, the Wall Street Journal article started a flurry of emails among Mrs. McCabe’s campaign, Kortan, Director McCabe, and the FBI’s General Counsel. Part of that exchange is an email from McCabe to someone in the General Counsel’s Office: “Sucks pretty much. Buckle in. It’s going to get rough.” The colleague responds, “I know. It’s awful. I shouldn’t be shocked by now, but I really am appalled.” McCabe also forwarded the article to Comey who responded, “Copy.”
 
On October 24, 2016, a memo was sent to all Special Agents in Charge, Assistant Directors, Executive Directors and the General Counsel’s Office regarding the Wall Street Journal article discussing campaign activities concerning Mrs. McCabe. Kortan suggested that questions could be referred to his office and he attached an “Overview of Deputy Director McCabe’s Recusal Related To Dr. McCabe’s Campaign for Political Office.” The Overview itself was previously reported by Judicial Watch.

Meanwhile, the documents also show repeated use of the official FBI email system in connection with Mrs. McCabe’s political campaign.

On March 13, 2015, Mrs. McCabe emails to her husband’s official FBI email account a draft press release announcing her run for state Senate.
 
In August 2015, McCabe uses his official FBI email account to advise a redacted recipient to visit his wife’s campaign website: “Jill has been busy as hell since she decided to run for VA state senate (long story). Check her out on Facebook as Dr. Jill McCabe for Senate.”
 
On November 2, 2015, Mrs. McCabe forwards an email to her husband – then the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Office – that accuses her opponent of extorting local businessmen. The email was sent to her husband’s official FBI account.

In summarizing these latest revelations, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said “these new documents show that the FBI leadership was politicized and compromised in its handling of the Clinton email investigation…it’s well past time for a do-over on the Clinton emails that requires a new, honest criminal investigation of her misconduct.”

Previously Deported Gang Member, Child Sex Offenders Busted Crossing Border

by BOB PRICE 22 Nov 2017

Border Patrol agents assigned to the Tucson Sector arrested two previously deported child sex offenders and a member of the Sureño 13 street gang illegally re-entering the U.S.

The arrests began on Saturday afternoon when agents working from the Brian A. Terry Border Patrol Station captured a man illegally crossing the border near Naco, Arizona. Agents arrested and transported him to the station for processing. During a background investigation, the agents learned that 34-year-old Abigael Calvo-Calvo, a Mexican national, has a criminal history that includes a conviction in San Mateo County, California, for “Lewd and Lascivious Acts with a Child Under 14.” The conviction occurred in 2012, according to information provided to Breitbart Texas by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) spokesman Rob Daniels.

Calvo-Calvo now faces new criminal charges for felony re-entry after being deported as a registered sex offender.

The following evening, Agents from the Douglas Station found another man crossing west of Douglas, Arizona. During processing, the agents determined the identity of 33-year-old Juan Herrera-Gameros, a Mexican national. A records check revealed a 2005 conviction in Cochise County Superior Court for “Sexual Conduct with a Child,” officials stated. Herrera-Gameros also faces charges of re-entry after being deported as a sex offender.

Brian A. Terry Station agents also stopped another potentially violent illegal immigrant from re-entering the U.S. The agents arrested 28-year-old Pedro Castro-Guillen, a Mexican national, after he crossed west of Naco. A records check uncovered a prior deportation due to his membership in the Sureño 13 street gang. Officials stated that Castro-Guillen will face criminal charges for immigration violations.

The Brian A. Terry Border Patrol Station is named in honor of slain Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry who was killed by a Mexican “rip crew” in southern Arizona on December 14, 2010. Agent Terry’s murder led to the disclosure of the Obama Administration’s Fast and Furious gun running scheme that put thousands of guns in the hands of Mexican criminals.

Breitbart News Executive Chairman and former White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon spoke at a banquet honoring Agent Terry on Saturday, Breitbart News’ Michelle Moons reported.

“Greater love hath no man than this, that he will lay down his life for his friend,” Bannon told attendees of the annual Brian Terry Foundation Courage Awards Dinner. “Brian Terry laid down his life for his friends, his family, his community, and his country. I don’t think you’ll meet a braver man.”

Bannon told Terry’s family and friends that his murder helped make border security a major issue for the 2016 presidential campaign.

“I can tell you, [Donald Trump] wouldn’t be President of the United States if [not for] the incident that happened here,” Bannon said. “Brian Terry will live in history as a historical figure and the reason was, he brought to the attention of the American people, he put a human face on it, he put a hero’s face on it, of what is exactly at risk on the southern border of our country.”

Report: FBI Informant Expected to Shed Light on Uranium One Deal

by KRISTINA WONG21 Nov 2017

An FBI informant gathered extensive evidence during his six years undercover into the Russian plot to corner the American uranium market, which included the Uranium One deal the Obama administration approved in 2010, according more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill.

The documents disprove recent statements by Justice Department officials in recent days that said informant William Campbell’s work would not shed light on the Uranium One deal.

“There is zero doubt we had evidence of criminal activity before the” approval of the Uranium One deal, “and that Justice knew about it through NSD [the natural security division],” a source with direct knowledge of the investigation told The Hill.

Campbell first documented for the FBI the initial illegal activity by Russian nuclear industry officials in fall 2009 — about a year before Russian state-owned firm Rosatom won approval from the Obama administration to purchase one-fifth of U.S. uranium assets, according to the memos.

Campbell, who was paid $50,000 a month to consult for the firm, was solicited by Rosatom colleagues to help overcome political opposition to the Uranium One purchase, while collecting evidence for the FBI that the sale was part of a larger effort by Moscow to make the U.S. more dependent on Russian uranium, records show.

The records show that Rod Fisk, a fellow American contractor who was also with Rosatom’s commercial sales arm Tenex, discussed in 2010 with Campbell Rosatom’s efforts to buy Uranium One through its subsidiary ARMZ.

Fisk also said some corporate management at Uranium One was not even told of the pending sale to Rosatom before it was announced, and that they had a lot of concerns, and that the price that Rosatom was paying for Uranium one seemed “strange.”

Unbeknown to Fisk and his colleagues, Campbell was gathering information for the FBI that Fisk, Tenex executive Vadim Mikron and others were engaged in a racketeering scheme involving millions of dollars in bribes and kickbacks, extortion and money laundering.

Fisk at the time headed a trucking firm that moved uranium across the U.S. on behalf of Rosatom. He and a later successor paid bribes to the Russians. In 2010, Fisk was transitioning from the trucking firm to become a key strategist for Tenex and Mikerin’s push to expand business in the U.S.

According to The Hill, Campbell’s files also show he regularly mentioned to FBI agents in 2010 a Washington entity with close ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton that was being paid millions to help expand Tenex’s business in the United States. That entity began increasing its financial support to a Clinton charitable project after it was hired by the Russians, according to the files.

Campbell had also engaged in conversations with Russian colleagues about the efforts of the Washington entity and others to gain influence with the Clintons and the Obama administration. Breitbart News’ Editor at Large Peter Schweizer was the first to reveal millions in donations to the Clinton Foundation during review of the Uranium One deal in his book “Clinton Cash.”

Justice Department officials confirmed that Campbell’s work was valuable enough for them to have paid him nearly $200,000 over six years — mostly for reimbursement but also in compensation of about $51,000 after convictions were secured.

Those officials also said the information he gathered was more significant to the counterintelligence aspect of the case begun in 2008 than the final criminal prosecutions.

Campbell’s work helped FBI counterintelligence chronicle a Russian uranium strategy in the U.S. modeled after Moscow’s success in creating natural gas monopolies in eastern Europe, officials told The Hill. Part of the goal was to make Americans reliant on Russian uranium before a program that converted former Soviet warheads into U.S. nuclear fuel expired in 2013.

Despite this plan, the Obama administration approved the 2010 sale of Uranium One to Rosatom, handing over one-fifth of the U.S.’s uranium production capability. The administration also removed Rosatom from export restrictions and made it easier for Moscow to win billions in new commercial uranium sales contracts.

Mikerin, the head of Tenex, Rosatom’s subsidiary, was sent by Moscow to “quarterback” its uranium strategy, The Hill reported. He and the head of an American trucking company later pled guilty to a racketeering scheme in the U.S.

Campbell’s FBI informant file shows that Uranium One came up several times in 2010 as the sale was pending, partly because Tenex was Rosatom’s commercial arm and would be charged with finding markets for the new uranium being mined and enriched both in the United States and abroad.

Campbell was asked by his colleagues to help overcome opposition to the Uranium One deal, his files show. Campbell intercepted a report that Mikeron was sent laying out the larger Russian nuclear strategy and what Russia’s goal was inside the U.S. to gain advantage in the uranium market.

“Some Republicans truly fear the entry of Russia into the U.S. market, as demonstrated by the fact that they are taking steps to block the purchase of Uranium One,” the report warned. “This effort bears watching as it may provide clues as to the likely political reaction if a Russian entity was going to participate in the construction and operation of a uranium enrichment plant in the U.S.”

Justice spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores told The Hill Monday that the Justice Department plans to brief members of Congress next week on Campbell’s work, the counterintelligence investigation into Russian uranium and the nuclear bribery case.

“The Department of Justice has authorized the confidential informant to disclose to the chairmen and ranking members of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, as well as staff, any information or documents he has concerning alleged corruption or bribery involving transactions in the uranium market. Until the informant publicly speaks to what he knew or knows about these matters, we are unable to respond further,” she said.

Lawmakers want to know what the FBI did with the evidence Campbell gathered, and whether it warned President Obama and other leaders before they made these decisions favorable to Russia.

“The essential question is whether the Obama Justice Department provided notice of the criminal activity of certain officials before the CFIUS approval of the Uranium One deal and other government decisions that enabled the Russians to trade nuclear materials in the U.S,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) told Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein last week.

After the Uranium One deal, Campbell “confronted” one of his FBI handlers and said the U.S. had given Mikerin a work visa despite evidence of criminal activity, a source familiar with his planned testimony told The Hill.

According to the source, the agent responded back to the informant with a comment suggesting “politics” was involved.

The sources familiar with the full body of Campbell’s work told The Hill they expect he can provide significant new information to Congress.

“Will he be able to prove that we knew Russia was engaged in criminal conduct before Uranium One was approved, you bet,” a source said. “Were the Russians using political influence and pulling political levers to try to win stuff from the U.S. government, you bet. Was he perfect, no one in this line of work is. But we were focused on much larger issues than just that.”

FLASHBACK: SOCIALISTS DEVELOPED NET NEUTRALITY TO CENSOR INTERNET

The truth about net neutrality revealed: it’s a trojan horse for govt control

Kit Daniels | Infowars.com – NOVEMBER 21, 2017

Net neutrality, which was championed by the Obama administration, was the brainchild of a socialist professor who wanted government control of the Internet to kill online “capitalist” advertising and to promote “socialist principles.”

The professor, Dr. Robert McChesney of the University of Illinoisfounded the socialist thinktank Free Press in 2002, which received funding from billionaire activist George Soros and had tremendous influence over the Obama administration.

“At the moment, the battle over network neutrality is not to completely eliminate the telephone and cable companies, but the ultimate goal is to get rid of the media capitalists in the phone and cable companies and to divest them from control,” he told the website SocialistProject in 2009.

As usual, anything George Soros promotes is bad for the public at large.

Here’s some more quotes from Dr. McChesney revealing the FCC’s true agenda:

“Advertising is the voice of capital. We need to do whatever we can to limit capitalist propaganda, regulate it, minimize it, and perhaps even eliminate it. The fight against hyper-commercialism becomes especially pronounced in the era of digital communications.” (Media Capitalism, the State, and 21st Century Media Democracy Struggles: An Interview with Robert McChesney – The Bullet Socialist Project, September 8, 2009)

Our job is to make media reform part of our broader struggle for democracy, social justice, and, dare we say it, socialism. It is impossible to conceive of a better world with a media system that remains under the thumb of Wall Street and Madison Avenue, under the thumb of the owning class.” (Journalism, Democracy, … and Class Struggle – Monthly Review, November 2000)

“There is no real answer (to the U.S. economic crisis) but to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles.” (A New New Deal under Obama? (with John Bellamy Foster) – Monthly Review, December 21, 2008)

“Only government can implement policies and subsidies to provide an institutional framework for quality journalism.” (The Death and Life of Great American Newspapers – Nation, March 18, 2009)

McChesney’s managing director at Free Press, Craig Aaron, had this to say:

“We need a law that says, no matter what kind of network you’re on—wired, wireless, I forget, there’s some other network coming in the future—that net neutrality applies.” (Interview with Robert McChesney – Media Matters Public Radio show, March 22, 2009)

And McChesney’s former policy director at Free Press, Ben Scott, also said:

“Increasingly the Internet is no longer a commercial service, it’s an infrastructure…What we’re witnessing at the FCC now is the logical next step which is we are going to create a regulatory framework for the Internet which recognizes it is an infrastructure now and not a commercial service.” (C-SPAN: The Communicators – C-Span, September 25, 2009)

Free Press had wielded extraordinary influence over the Obama administration, so it’s not surprising it spearheaded the push towards net neutrality.

“[Former FCC Chairman Julius] Genachowski’s press secretary at the FCC, Jen Howard, used to handle media relations at Free Press,” The Wall Street Journal reported. “The FCC’s [former] chief diversity officer, Mark Lloyd, co-authored a Free Press report calling for regulation of political talk radio.”

Lloyd’s report, entitled The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio, advocated draconian measures to limit free speech on AM and FM stations under the guise of “balanced radio programming,” i.e. a fairness doctrine.

“While progressive talk is making inroads on commercial stations, conservative talk continues to be pushed out over the airwaves in greater multiples of hours than progressive talk is broadcast,” the report stated, oversimplifying politics into a false left/right paradigm. “These empirical findings may not be surprising given general impressions about the format, but they are stark and raise serious questions about whether the companies licensed to broadcast over the public airwaves are serving the listening needs of all Americans.”

Net neutrality as designed by the Obama administration is simply a trojan horse to restrict political free speech on the Internet.

Fitton – Judicial Watch Suing State Dept Over Manafort Podesta Double Standard

Fitton reveals Judicial Watch is suing the State Dept for documents that may explain why Mueller is treating similar “offenders” Manafort and Podesta very differently…

By Rick Wells

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton announced a new lawsuit on Monday against the State Department in their never-ending battle against corruption and the anti-American parasites attempting to destroy this nation.

Judicial Watch is seeking records about the Podesta group. He explains, “You may recall the Podesta Group has been tied to Paul Manafort, who was indicted by Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation, yet Podesta’s been tied to the Clintons and of course Paul Manafort is tied to the Trump team.”

Fitton says, “We want to know if there was any disparate treatment of team Trump versus team Clinton by Robert Mueller, whose investigation is suspicious, given its partisan nature. Judicial Watch is suing the State Department to find out the truth about what the Podesta group was up to with the Obama State Department.”   [VIDEOS BELOW]

In an interview from a few days earlier, and prior to the filing of the lawsuit, Fitton offered some other insight into some of the shady deals that they’re aware of and what prompted them to suspect there’s more to be learned.

He begins by pointing out that Paul Manafort was in partnership with the Podesta Group and that both he and Tony Podesta say their innocent, that all of the forms were filed properly. The main different seems to be an affiliation with President Trump’s campaign versus the Clintons and her campaign.

Fitton notes the fact that Mueller was working with the Clinton campaign who were responsible for the very dossier that is part of the flimsy basis for his investigation of Trump. He says, “It just screams disparate impact or disparate treatment between Manafort and Podesta or basically between the Trump team and the Clinton team.

Judicial Watch is going to see what kind of documentation may be found to indicate criminal wrongdoing as a possible and probable reasons for the different handling of the similar cases.

Fitton gave an explanation of why they think there might be something up a few days earlier: