Nolte: Quentin Tarantino Smeared Police Officers While Enabling Harvey Weinstein’s Alleged Crimes

by JOHN NOLTE20 Oct 2017

According to his Thursday interview with the New York Times, while he was running around smearing police officers as “murderers” in 2015, Quentin Tarantino was also covering up for and enabling Harvey Weinstein’s alleged crimes against women.

Because of his excessive use of the N-word, and those painfully awkward moments where he pretends to be black, Oscar-winning director Tarantino has struggled for decades to earn some respect from black audiences.

Well, almost exactly two years ago, with his next Weinstein Company feature, The Hateful Eight, just weeks from release, Tarantino cynically believed his ticket out of that mess, his ticket to expanding his audience within a black community now capable of producing box office hits all on its own, was to embrace the noxious, cop-hating Black Lives Matter movement.

Just four days after the murder of a New York City police officer, Tarantino made his first mistake when he stood before an anti-police rally in New York to say of our men in blue, “I am a human being with a conscience. And when I see murder, I cannot stand by, and I have to call the murdered the murdered and I have the call the murderers the murderers.”

The blowback was immediate. Police unions called for boycotts. Embarrassed by his own estranged son, even Tarantino’s father spoke out. The director’s reaction can best be described as belligerent. While claiming that he is not “anti-police,” Tarantino shrugged off the boycott and said he wanted to “go further with” his attacks on police officers, and soon he would.

He not only accused police officers of being guilty of “white supremacy,” he rejected the notion of “bad apples.” In a December interview with Entertainment Weekly, Tarantino said, “I completely and utterly reject the bad apples argument …  It’s about institutional racism. It’s about institutional cover-ups that are about protecting the force as opposed to the citizens.”

To no one’s surprise, The Hateful Eight tanked. After glowing red hot with his two previous features and biggest box office hits to date — 2012’s Django Unchained ($162 million) and 2009’s Inglorious Bastards ($121 million) — Hateful Eight bottomed out at $54 million, which probably failed to cover its promotional costs. Its worldwide gross added just another $100 million, which means The Weinstein Company probably lost money.

As if all that was not bad enough, we now know that while he was smearing law enforcement as an institution filled with murderers and white supremacists, Tarantino, according to his own words, was covering for and enabling what Breitbart News must describe as Harvey Weinstein’s alleged crimes, but what Tarantino believes were crime-crimes, like the “unwanted touching” of Tarantino’s girlfriend Mira Sorvino.

“I knew enough to do more than I did,” he said, citing several episodes involving prominent actresses. “There was more to it than just the normal rumors, the normal gossip. It wasn’t secondhand. I knew he did a couple of these things.

Tarantino said in the interview on Wednesday that he had heard about Mr. Weinstein’s behavior long before those articles. His own former girlfriend, Mira Sorvino, told him about unwelcome advances and unwanted touching by Mr. Weinstein.

“Everyone who was close to Harvey had heard of at least one of those incidents” chronicled in the first few articles, he said. “It was impossible they didn’t.”

When he and Ms. Sorvino started dating in 1995, she told him that not long before, Mr. Weinstein had massaged her without asking, chased her around a hotel room and even showed up at her apartment in the middle of the night[.]

Tarantino now claims to be ashamed of his silence, which is fine. At least he is not pretending, as I assume many others are, that he was ignorant of what was going on.

Nonetheless, back in 2015, with millions already in his pocket, with plenty of other producers willing to work with him, Tarantino still enabled a monster. Worse, while doing so, he smeared and smeared and smeared American police officers all in an effort to put more money into his and that monster’s pocket.

So what will it take for Tarantino to finally be ashamed of defaming and ginning up rage against those who do act when a crime is committed, who do risk their lives (not their next movie) to stop that crime, and do so for what Tarantino would describe as pocket change.

WIKILEAKS TO EXPOSE HILLARY CLINTON’S TIES TO RUSSIA & SETH RICH, 4CHAN PREDICTS

Predicted data dump to derail Mueller’s probe while implicating Hillary

 | Infowars.com – OCTOBER 18, 2017

Julian Assange may release evidence showing Hillary Clinton colluded with Russia during the presidential election as well as the real extent of her crimes, says an anonymous source on 4Chan who has so proved to be far more credible than the mainstream media.

The evidence apparently stems from a file dump taken by the NYPD from Huma Abedin’s laptop that convicted sexual predator Anthony Weiner had access to.

“This dump will be broad,” says the source. “It will probably be the biggest file dump Wikileaks has ever published in size and when it’s out there, it’s going to leave NO DOUBT on things like, WHO colluded with Russia, WHY it was done, WHAT crimes Hillary (as Secretary of State AND as a presidential candidate) and the elite DNC/GOP/Obama administration, like Lynch, Comey, etc. actually committed.”

“Again, when it’s done you will have zero doubt as to who is actually guilty of crimes and election rigging.”

Assange is reportedly waiting until Oct. 21st to give special prosecutor Robert Mueller – and Deep State elements within the FBI – the opportunity to back off the probe against President Trump because, so far, the known evidence actually implicates Hillary Clinton, and the data dump will only implicate her even more.

“Trump knows it’s better for the people if Mueller does what’s right,” he continued. “It will restore people’s faith in justice and our departments.”

“If Assange gets it done himself as I expect, then like I said, Trump will have no choice but to address the downfall of TWO of the three letter agencies/departments I mentioned last week… FBI and CIA.”

“Mueller and team have until the 21st, assuming Assange keeps his promise and/or no one gets to him first. Assange dropped his hash yesterday. They all know what’s coming, regardless of who makes it public first,” he added.

As Infowars reported on Oct. 17, Fox News’ Sean Hannity hinted that Wikileaks may drop something that relates to Hillary Clinton and the Russian collusion narrative.

Two days before, Assange released a hash key on Twitter that Hannity responded to in a series of tweets which were later deleted.

Capture

The Wikileaks founder is known to release the hash keys to his media publishers around a week before the data dump goes public.

“It bodes better for Trump and the administration, if the ‘special prosecutor’ America demanded, costing taxpayers more than $1 million/day investigating what Trump and Mueller both know is factual bullshit, looks better if Mueller breaks [the revelations] himself,” the source added. “Assange and Hannity are playing this like a f*cking pressure cooker against Mueller and everyone else guilty and involved, right now.”

“There are VERY FEW options left for them and in this environment with so many people paying such CLOSE attention to EVERY F*CKING DETAIL released about everything and anything (like the Vegas ‘investigation’ sh*t show of ‘evidence’ and ‘reporting’), they all know their old, standard, bag of once successful tricks, won’t work.”

And as Infowars reported on July 25, Mueller’s staff is stacked with experts in organized crime rings and terrorism – not foreign relations and election fraud – which suggests that the probe could easily pivot toward investigating Hillary.

The predicted data dump may prove, once and for all, that last summer’s DNC email leak wasn’t a hack job by Russia, but rather an internal breach somehow involving murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich – who was apparently a Bernie Sanders supporter – and former congressional IT staffer Imran Awan, who quickly fled the country after leading police to a laptop linked to former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

NYT SENIOR EDITOR ADMITS WRITERS BASH TRUMP TO INFLUENCE READERS

VP Pence is f**king horrible, she says

Dan Lyman | Infowars.com – OCTOBER 17, 2017

James O’Keefe and his crack journalists at Project Veritas have released the highly-anticipated third installment in their ‘American Pravda’ investigative series, which features hidden camera footage of a New York Times senior content editor admitting the paper’s liberal, anti-Trump bias.

Desiree Shoe is a Times’ Senior Home Page Editor, based in their London office. Her duties including curating the front pages of the paper’s website, track breaking news stories, and write alerts, according to her.

Shoe revealed that journalists at the Times intentionally slant their writing to portray President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence in a negative light in order to influence and appease their dominantly leftist reader base, asserting, “A lot of [Times readers] are liberal.”

She professed her detestation for Trump, but contended that Vice President Mike Pence is “possibly worse,” citing the fact that he is “extremely religious” as a reason for being “f**king horrible.”

When asked why the Times homepage was completely dedicated to Trump bashing during the 2016 election cycle, Shoe confirmed what many who see through the #FakeNews already knew.

“If we write him, about how insanely crazy he is and how ludicrous his policies are, then maybe people will read it and be like, ‘oh wow, we shouldn’t vote for him,’” Shoe said. “I feel like Trump is… sort of an idiot in a lot of ways. Just an oblivious idiot.”

“If you impeach him, then Pence becomes president – Mike Pence, who’s f**king horrible.”

When asked by her companion, who seems to possibly be British, to explain Pence’s short-comings, Shoe revealed her deeper biases.

“He’s extremely, extremely religious. Extremely religious. He at one point backed a bill that hinted at conversion therapy for gay people, which is like electrocution, stuff like that,” she claimed.

While the Times has participated in perpetuating the lie that Pence ever endorsed electro-shock conversion therapy for homosexuals, they also debunked the myth in the same piece, admitting it is mere speculation derived from baseless inference  – in other words, nothing more than the average ‘homophobe’ smear campaign doggedly waged by leftists against most Republicans.

Shoe goes on to admit that the Times has been a beneficiary of the “Trump bump” – an informal term describing a substantial increase in readership and traffic due to the exciting and/or devastating impact of the ‘Trump Effect’ on the media as a whole.

“I think the business model itself is just… there’s so much panic about what to do,” Shoe said. “What else is a company supposed to do?”

O’Keefe points out that Nick Dudich, a Times Audience Strategy Editor who was exposed in a prior installment of ‘American Pravda,’ admitted to the same phenomenon propping up the ‘Failing New York Times – and other decaying mainstream media outlets.

“Trump has driven us more business than anybody else,” Dudich conceded. “Anytime he says ‘failing,’ we add a boost of subscribers.”

The Times second quarter revenues from 2016 to 2017 rose 9.2% and they also experienced a 63% increase in digital subscriptions in the same period.

Shoe semi-obscurely confessed to the Times’ leftist prejudice by acknowledging the widely-known fact that its customer base is dominated by leftists and by also admitting that they gear their content towards those readers.

“The New York Times is… widely understood to be liberal-leaning,” she said. “One of things we’re doing at the Times now is making sure that we’re aware of our audience.”

Dan Lyman: Facebook | Twitter

WITHERSPOON: I was assaulted by director at 16… JENNIFER LAWRENCE: Told ‘perfectly f–kable’ at 15, made to stand nude in lineup…

Screen Shot 2017-10-17 at 11.57.29 AM

By Alexia Fernandez

Jennifer Lawrence opened up about the “humiliating” and “degrading” experience she had in the early days of her career.

The 27-year-old spoke Monday night about her experience as a woman in the movie industry at Elle‘s Women in Hollywood event sponsored by Calvin Klein and L’Oréal Paris.

The mother! actress, who was one of eight honorees at the L.A. event, explained that she was asked by producers to slim down drastically for one of her first roles.

PHOTOS: 44 Women Who Have Accused Harvey Weinstein of Sexual Misconduct

Screen Shot 2017-10-17 at 12.00.31 PM

“When I was much younger and starting out, I was told by producers of a film to lose 15 pounds in two weeks,” she said, revealing another actress before her had already been fired for not losing the weight fast enough.

But it did not end there, she said.

“During this time a female producer had me do a nude line-up with about five women who were much, much, thinner than me. We are stood side-by-side with only tape on covering our privates,” she added.

“After that degrading and humiliating line-up, the female producer told me I should use the naked photos of myself as inspiration for my diet.”

Lawrence said she tried to stand up for herself and told another producer she thought the weight loss demands were not appropriate.

“He said he didn’t know why everyone thought I was so fat, he thought I was ‘perfectly f—able.’”

PHOTOS: All the Stars Who Have Spoken Out Against Harvey Weinstein

The actress said she felt “trapped” by the experience. “I let myself be treated a certain way because I felt I had to for my career,” she shared.

“I’m still learning that I don’t have to smile when a man makes me uncomfortable,” she added. “Every human being should have the power to be treated with respect because they’re human.”

The Oscar winner also said that despite the sadness that comes with sexual harassment or assault, she believes the experiences of all women have been “oddly unifying.”

Lawrence told PEOPLE in a statement that she was “deeply disturbed” to hear of the sexual harassment and assault allegations made against Harvey Weinstein.

“I was deeply disturbed to hear the news about Harvey Weinstein’s behavior,” she said. “I worked with Harvey five years ago and I did not experience any form of harassment personally, nor did I know about any of these allegations. This kind of abuse is inexcusable and absolutely upsetting.”

She continued: “My heart goes out to all of the women affected by these gross actions. And I want to thank them for their bravery to come forward.”

Her comments come after dozens of women came forward in recent weeks to accuse Weinstein of sexual misconduct — including Cara DelevingneAshley Judd, and Angelina Jolie. Eight women spoke out against Weinstein in a bombshell New York Times report accusing the movie mogul of inappropriate behavior. The paper also reported that Weinstein reached private settlements with eight women, including actress Rose McGowan.

Following the initial report, Weinstein said in a statement that he was working with therapists and planned to “deal with this issue head-on.” He has since been fired from his powerhouse studio, The Weinstein Company, and his wife, Marchesa designer Georgina Chapman, has announced she’s leaving him.

In addition, the The New Yorker revealed — among 13 different women’s accounts of alleged sexual harassment, assault or rape.

In response to the lengthy allegations made against Weinstein in the New Yorker piece, a spokesperson for Weinstein said, “Any allegations of non-consensual sex are unequivocally denied by Mr. Weinstein.”

This article originally appeared on People.com