October 20, 2016 By
The Democrats have used their typical smoke-and-mirrors, fear-mongering tactics to distract Americans from the very real conflict boiling between the U.S. and Russia — which President Obama seems to be inciting in an effort to potentially influence the presidential election.
The Left has blamed the Russians for cyber hacking activities — such as the hack of the Democrat National Committee and the WikiLeaks dumps — with no concrete evidence provided to back the claims up.
In spite of this, there are reports that the Obama administration plans on retaliating against Russia via a cyber attack. Vice President Joe Biden confirmed these reports in an interview on Friday with Chuck Todd, host of “Meet the Press.”
In a Democrat National Committee email released over the summer by WikiLeaks, former DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz reprimanded Todd over biased coverage at NBC, and even bent over backwards to schedule a meeting with her to discuss it — further proof that the mainstream media operates as an arm of the Democrat party.
Todd parroted the left’s currently-baseless claim that Russia is to blame for recent cyber attacks as he asked Biden, “Why haven’t we sent a message yet to Putin?”
Biden replied,”We’re sending a message. We have the capacity to do it and it will be at the time of our choosing, and under the circumstances that will have the greatest impact.”
Todd asked Biden if the public would know when that message was sent and Biden said in response: “hope not.”
The U.K. Daily Mail reported the Russian response to Biden’s threat:
‘The threats directed against Moscow and our state’s leadership are unprecedented because they are voiced at the level of the US vice president.
‘To the backdrop of this aggressive, unpredictable line, we must take measures to protect (our) interests, to hedge risks,’ a Kremlin spokesman said, according to RIA Novosti news agency.
Between the threat of so-called “retaliatory” acts for Russian cyber attacks that the Obama administration has yet to provide proof of to the public, and the report from Reuters that Obama is considering “direct U.S. military action” in Syria, it’s clear how serious the threat of major conflict with Russia is.
The rest of the world is talking about this threat — particularly Russia, of course — but the U.S. media is largely silent about the threat of an impending massive conflict with Russia.
This is because the media is in the tank for Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton, who has made her intentions toward Russia abundantly clear on the campaign trail.
Obama is clearly inciting a conflict with Russia that would be extremely devastating. The globalists clearly want a war with Russia and Trump has repeatedly said that he wants to work with Russia and find a way to avoid it.
Many liberals voted for Obama because he laughably claimed to be a non-interventionist in the wake of former President Bush’s disastrous farce of a crusade to spread democracy and nation building that was a part of the move toward a new world order.
It’s absurd for these same liberals to vote for Clinton knowing that her policies could very well plunge us into World War III. It’s absurd for anyone who doesn’t want massive conflict with Russia and/or World War III to not vote for Donald Trump — our only chance to stop the dangerous globalist agenda.