Candidate cynically panders to welfare class voting Democrat

JULY 18, 2016

Hillary Clinton believes gangs are an adequate substitute for the family. She makes the remark in the video below posted by Dinesh D’Souza on July 15.
“Joining a gang is like having a family,” Clinton said during a discussion on gun violence in Connecticut. “It’s feeling like you are a part of something bigger than yourself. So we’re either going to have gangs that murder and rob and do the things that are so destructive to their members and to the community, or we’re going to have positive gangs, we’re going to have positive alternatives for young people.”

Sociologists have conclusively demonstrated the formation of gangs correlates to the breakdown of the family under state-run social welfare and is the largest contributor to crime.
“The relationship [between single-parent families and crime] is so strong that controlling for family configuration erases the relationship between race and crime and between low income and crime,” notes Barbara Dafoe. “This conclusion shows up time and again in the literature. The nation’s mayors, as well as police officers, social workers, probation officers, and court officials, consistently point to family break up as the most important source of rising rates of crime.”

Clinton ignores the fact the family is the foundation of civilization and the welfare system destroys that foundation.

In Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950-1980, Charles Murray reveals how welfare under Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” destroyed families and resulted in violence and social nihilism. Since 1964, the federal government has spent approximately $16 trillion on welfare, a figure that translates to 15% of the GNP.

“Broken families are causally related to all sorts of indices of social failure: criminal behavior, gang membership, lower education, less general achievement, unemployment, jail sentences, out-of-wedlock births, etc.,” writes Walter E. Block.
“[Gang activity] is dysfunctional culture. For her to sit up there and embrace this as if it’s something that’s socially acceptable in the black community,” Milwaukee County Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. said after Clinton praised gangs as a viable alternative to the traditional family.

“She should have brought that up and said ‘we gotta change these policies so we can help the black community reconstruct their family experience so kids can make better lifestyle choices.”

Clinton was not attempting to provide a solution to a serious social problem, however. She was courting Democrat voters ahead of the November election.

A survey by the Maxwell Poll on the political affiliation of Americans receiving government aid shows that 81% of those in public housing, 74% on Medicaid, 67% on food stamps, and 63% receiving welfare or public assistance vote for Democrats.


Freedom-based uprisings worldwide worrying globalists

Mary A

CONTROL THE PUBLIC’S FOOD SUPPLY, AND YOU CONTROL THE PUBLIC. The recent EBT system “breakdown” caused panic & “food riots” in several American cities. Food Stamp recipients went ballistic when told that their EBT cards weren’t being accepted. This scenario has already taken place in Brazil, Venezuela, and various other nations. REMEMBER, over 100 MILLION Americans now receive some form of government aid, just to make ends meet. This includes Food Stamps, Welfare, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, & more. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THIS “AID” STOPS ???

All bets are off after the next election.
Fatime Oomyadin

Do you really think it will only affect the USA? What about the EU? And don’t you recognise this would only mean heading to the status you have already gifted to millions of innocent people in the Middle East, with your wars? Did you really think that those who did this on people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Syria, Pakistan, Yemen… would spare you out, wouldkeep you safe and comfortable?

I dont believe it happens! But prepare for worse, hope for the best!

Everybody who catches a whiff of government preparation screams “NWO, NWO, They’re gonna force World Government on us! Sound the alarm!” My concern is that the government hasn’t nearly made sufficient preparation for the collapse of the World Economy. Whether it’s maintain law and order and provide security to preserve the Republic or maintain law and order and security to usher in NWO, the need to maintain security is still vital and must be prepared for. I think they probably know that the economic collapse is coming and have known for years. In fact, the economic collapse and Mega Bank insolvency has probably already occurred and they’ve just been printing money to give themselves time to prepare for the inevitable. The economic pros and banking insiders have probably come to the conclusion years ago, that there’s no saving the economy and the only solution is a Global Reset – not just a Debt Jubilee but a complete vaporization of both Debts and monetary Assets like savings, checking, retirement accounts etc. I don’t know what they have planned regarding physical assets. The best case scenario is that they have a plan. A worse-case scenario and the one that meshes with Bible prophecy is that they don’t have a plan or they don’t have a very good one.
Eric Warncke Sr

too late – – we’re already in the stone age . . . there’s no jobs . . everybody’s unemployed . . everybody’s on welfare . . everybody’s on drugs . . everybody thinks hillary should be next president . . america is just a country full of the stupidest people on the planet . . trying desperately to kill themselves off . . just vote for hillary and you are on your way.
Mr gutitdragit

Most people don’t have a gallon of water stored in their homes. If their faucet shuts off they call the utility company to cry and complain. The same people are the ones laughing at the preppers for being paranoid.

Entitlement Mentality Gone Wild

Yes ladies and gentlemen it is real. Everything your about to see or have already seen is real. Most of us have our collective jaws on the floor.

teejay Trujillo

Amazing all of those disabled people sprinting across that park for free housing.  It’s a Miracle!
Ed Stevens

Easiest way to disperse this type of crowd…tell them this is a job fair, not section 8 housing.
Rob Koch

Anytime a woman has more than 3 kids, and from different fathers, and has no clue who the father is NEEDS to have her tubes tied. PERIOD. The American citizens are sick of supporting these low life idiots.
Creepy Renz (RenzFinality)

1:45 Someone needs to be held accountable? what about you and the deadbeat(s) you fucked?
Kz Teligo

Black people of america are like gypsies of Russia and eastern Europe

I actually had to pause to work out the math of being 37 with 15 kids.

how come their all black women? someone should be accountable.. how about you. how many different baby daddies does she have.. gross. how sad. be accountable for your self, close your legs. be a grown up. pay your own way. it so sad that the people who contribute the least us the most..

Democrat State Rep. BUSTED On Welfare Fraud And It’s Not Her First Time Being Wanted By The Law…


Posted by

A week doesn’t go by without reading or witnessing another welfare recipient willfully defrauding the system; in fact most of us have become so accustomed to reading about these ongoing scandals that we’ve practically grown numb, until “lo and behold” something more outrageous captures our attention.

And what could be more egregious than a state legislator recklessly and willfully personally defrauding the welfare system and that seems to be exactly what Democratic Arizona State Rep. Ceci Velasquez is being charged with ”welfare fraud!”

According to Arizona Department of Economic Security Director Timothy Jeffries, Velasquez is accused of ripping off the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as SNAP. The incident came to light by an apparent tip in 2014, that Velasquez was engaged in some possible fraudulent activity between 2013 and 2015 involving the illegal use of food stamps, alleging that the Democratic state lawmaker fraudulently used $1,726 worth of food stamps for her own personal use.

Velasquez who was elected in 2014, was charged with 3-counts of felony by the Arizona State Grand Jury, including unlawful use of food stamps; and theft.

Ironically this isn’t the first time that the liberal Democrat has run afoul of the law, and in fact has an outstanding warrant for her arrest, due to unpaid court fines, which currently stands at around $2,000, stemming from driving with a suspended license and no insurance.

Obviously if those charges prove true and Velasquez is charged with a felony rap, she would be forced to relinquish her seat, as per legislative rules and ironically would be the 3rd house member within the Democratic Party, forced from office within recent years, which perhaps is the larger issue then a politician getting caught with her hands in the welfare jar.

In that it’s not by happenstance that we’ve seen an almost epidemic rise of “crooked politicians” within the last few years, no doubt we’ve all witnessed this type of behavior before from the privileged political class, however there was always a sense of shame, a sense of guilt attached to those misdeeds.

However now we have a political elitist running for the most powerful office in the land, with various clouds of corruption hanging over her head, and a sizeable number of her supporters simply don’t care… and thus Ceci Velasquez is simply the outgrowth of a liberal orthodoxy that justifies corruption and malfeasance, as an acceptable part of the political system.

Source: AZ Central

Food Stamp Outage Could Trigger Nationwide Riots

Obama admin. enrolling millions of illegals to overload EBT system?

JUNE 9, 2016

The ongoing food stamp outage could trigger nationwide riots across the country similar to the recent unrest in Baltimore and Ferguson.

Thousands – if not millions – of food stamp recipients have not gotten their benefits nine days into the month due to “glitches” in the electronic benefit transfer (EBT) system, and Americans are worried that if the outage continues, mass civil unrest will erupt.

“Yes, the s**t is starting to hit the fan; get ready for riots when people without jobs start getting hungry,” Colo. resident Jeri Brace warned on, the web site reporting the mass EBT outages.

Fear of riots is a common theme on the site’s comment section.
“The board is set for unbelievable rioting, looting and worse – and all that’s needed is a little spark,” Rob P. pointed out. “What better spark than one day, no one’s EBT cards work.”

It’s even been speculated the EBT system was intentionally shut down to fuel rioting and disrupt the presidential campaign as Donald Trump continues to sap away influence from the global technocrats meeting in Dresden, Germany, this week.

But one thing is for certain, however: by encouraging mass dependency on the welfare system, the Obama administration has ensured nationwide rioting due to a large-scale collapse of the food stamp program which can then be exploited to expand the federal government.

As we reported in 2013, the administration had a goal to dramatically increase food stamp enrollment in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

This corresponded with a strategy called pressure from above and below in which the government deliberately creates problems, then offer “solutions” that only expand government powers at the expense of individual rights.

The USDA in particular spent vast amounts of taxpayer money to encourage illegal immigrants to apply for food stamps through television and print ads.
The agency was even working with the Mexican government to “increase participation in SNAP,” the Daily Caller reported in 2012.

In other words, by enrolling more people into welfare than the EBT system can handle, outages will result, people will riot, and the government can then use the crisis to expand federal control over local police, something we’ve also been reporting on.

Last year the Obama administration released a plan to federalize state and local law enforcement entitled Task Force on 21st Century Policing which would force departments to adhere to stricter, federal-designed requirements when they receive federal funding.
Mass rioting would give the administration the opportunity they need to enact that plan.
Overall an estimated 46.5 million Americans, or 14.5% of the U.S. population, are on welfare.

Sweden Took 162,000 Refugees Last Year, 494 Got Jobs

Screen Shot 2016-06-06 at 11.58.56 AM

Sweden refugees welcome2

The “refugees” are not coming to work. They are coming to Islamize the land. This story, and so many other stories like it, makes that clear: the “refugees” are coming to live off the largesse of the kuffar. It’s jizya. It’s their due.

Just 494 out of the 162,000 refugees who applied for asylum in Sweden in 2015 have managed to get a job, according to government figures released Tuesday.

Refugees are eligible to work while their applications are pending as long as they can show a valid identification document and haven’t been rejected for asylum in the past. A majority of asylum seekers would qualify for a work permit, but the national migration office was only capable of issuing one to one-third due to the high demand.

“There was an incredible amount of people who applied for asylum in Sweden, and for us to be able to register everyone we had to disregard certain areas, and employment was one of them,” Lisa Bergstrand, officer at the Swedish immigration office, told Swedish public broadcaster SVT. “We do what we’ve been told to do.”

Getting migrants off welfare and into the job market has been a problem for most European countries during the ongoing refugee crisis.

Germany announced reforms to its labor laws in May to make it easier for migrants to enter the job market. Migrants are exempt from minimum wage regulations and thousands of “one-euro jobs” — in which refugees can work for low wages of between $1.13 and $2.80 per hour — have been created.

The center-left government in Sweden has proposed a reform to asylum laws to force migrants into the work force. If an applicant can’t support himself after three years in the country, they won’t be eligible for permanent residency if the reforms pass. – See more at:


Cashing in: Illegal immigrants get $1,261 more welfare than American families, $5,692 vs. $4,431

Screen Shot 2016-05-09 at 12.00.31 PM


Illegal immigrant households receive an average of $5,692 in federal welfare benefits every year, far more than the average “native” American household, at $4,431, according to a new report on the cost of immigration released Monday.

The Center for Immigration Studies, in an analysis of federal cost figures, found that all immigrant-headed households — legal and illegal — receive an average of $6,241 in welfare, 41 percent more than native households. As with Americans receiving benefits such as food stamps and cash, much of the welfare to immigrants supplements their low wage jobs.

The total cost is over $103 billion in welfare benefits to households headed by immigrants. A majority, 51 percent, of immigrant households receive some type of welfare compared to 30 percent of native households, said the analysis of Census data.

“While it is important for Americans to understand the rate of welfare use among immigrants, expressing that use in dollar terms offers a more tangible metric that is tied to current debates over fiscal policy. With the nation facing a long-term budgetary deficit, this study helps illuminate immigration’s impact on the problem,” wrote the report’s author Jason Richwine, a Harvard educated analyst of immigration data.

The new report follows another that found President Obama seeking$17,613 for every new illegal minor, more than Social Security retirees get.

Richwine noted that illegal immigrants are barred from directly receiving welfare, but instead get it via their legal children. “Illegal immigrants are barred from directly accessing most (though not all) welfare programs, but they can receive welfare through their U.S.-born children. Legal immigrant households, which have greater eligibility for welfare, cost $6,378 on average,” he wrote.

The key findings:

— The average household headed by an immigrant (legal or illegal) costs taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare benefits, which is 41 percent higher than the $4,431 received by the average native household.

— The average immigrant household consumes 33 percent more cash welfare, 57 percent more food assistance, and 44 percent more Medicaid dollars than the average native household. Housing costs are about the same for both groups.

— At $8,251, households headed by immigrants from Central America and Mexico have the highest welfare costs of any sending region — 86 percent higher than the costs of native households.

— Illegal immigrant households cost an average of $5,692 (driven largely by the presence of U.S.-born children), while legal immigrant households cost $6,378.

— The greater consumption of welfare dollars by immigrants can be explained in large part by their lower level of education and larger number of children compared to natives. Over 24 percent of immigrant households are headed by a high school dropout, compared to just 8 percent of native households. In addition, 13 percent of immigrant households have three or more children, vs. just 6 percent of native households.