Globalists hit road block as Europeans reject mass migration

 | – NOVEMBER 17, 2017

The tide is turning in key parts of Europe as the issues of immigration and national security have reached critical mass, prompting political upheaval across the continent sparked by backlash against open borders.

Austria’s Interior Ministry is reporting that applications for asylum have decreased by 43% this year, while the rate of deportations has increased by over 50%.

Applicants admitted to the asylum program in 2016 nearly maxed out Austria’s cap of 37,500 as over 36,000 were accepted. However, only half of this year’s capacity of 35,000 has been filled – a sharp decline.

The future is even more promising for Austria, as two anti-open borders parties – the dominant People’s Party (OVP) and the surging Freedom Party (FPO) – are working to form a new governing coalition, which could see the admission of migrants drop even more sharply.

If the Freedom Party, led by Heinz-Christian Strache, had their way, Austria would move towards zero or negative immigration flow by way of eliminating its ‘asylum’ program, while deporting many of the tens of thousands of migrants who have settled in the country in recent years.

“We do not need an upper limit, nor a halving of the upper limit – we need a zero-migration, in fact, a minus-migration, because of all the illegals and criminals who are in the country,” Strache said earlier this year. “Let us put an end to this policy of Islamisation… otherwise we Austrians, we Europeans will come to an abrupt end.”

In Germany, Angela Merkel – upon whom many place the most blame for the flood of millions of illegal immigrants into Europe from Africa and the Middle East – is facing the possibility of either being ejected as Chancellor, or the prospect of a second election after her party’s failure to form a coalition, with immigration quotas being a central issue of contention.

Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union missed a critical deadline yesterday while trying to stitch together a three-party “Jamaica coalition,” which could force new elections – or her ouster.

“It’s not just the chancellor’s fourth term that depends on the success of Jamaica, but her entire political career,” reported Bild ahead of the deadline, calling it Merkel’s “most dangerous night.”

Despite the arbitrary cutoff date, talks are expected to continue into the weekend.

Merkel’s party has slipped to its lowest popularity in the polls in 17 years – while the populist, pro-border control Alternative For Germany (AfD) makes record gains.


“With coalition talks ongoing and Merkel’s position under question, it marks another low point an increasing backlash against her insistence on mass open door migration,” reports Westmonster. “With the anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany on the rise having gone from 0 seats in the Bundestag to over 90, it is clear that the shape of German politics is now changing radically.

Donna Brazile rats on Hillary and DNC; reveals secret agreement that gave Hillary control BEFORE nomination

In mid-October prior to the 2016 election, Donald Trump and his surrogates amplified their argument that the election was “rigged.”



Those “predictions” are hilarious in hindsight, and when it came to rigging elections, that’s something Hillary Clinton had undoubtedly done during the Democrat primary. Not long after Hillary released “What Happened,” former DNC interim Chairwoman Donna Brazile has released a new book of her own titled “Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House”

In it, she writes that it “broke her heart” when she discovered evidence that Hillary’s campaign had fixed the Democratic nomination system in her favor.

According to The Hillin an excerpt from the book that was provided to Politico, Brazile explains how she was tasked with investigating the DNC after hacked emails suggested the Clinton campaign fixed the nomination.

“By September 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart,” Brazile wrote, referring to Clinton’s main opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

Brazile described an agreement between the Clinton campaign, the DNC and Clinton’s joint fundraising committee that said the campaign would “control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised.” The arrangement was made to financially help the party, which was in significant debt following the 2012 reelection campaign of former President Barack Obama, she added.

“The campaign had the DNC on life support, giving it money every month to meet its basic expenses, while the campaign was using the party as a fund-raising clearing house,” Brazile wrote.

Brazile noted that the agreement was signed in August of 2015, effectively giving Clinton control of the party almost one year before she secured the nomination.
“The funding arrangement … was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical,” Brazile wrote.

“If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.”

Brazile should know – she helped with the rigging, after all. She replaced Debbie Wasserman Schultz as chairwoman of the DNC after Schultz had to step down among ethics concerns after a WikiLeaks release showed her referring to Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver as “damn liar” and an “ASS” and said the senator has “never been a member of the Democratic Party and has no understanding of what we do.”

Brazile herself lost her job as a contributor at CNN for ethics reasons as well – as she was caught leaking debate questions to Hillary ahead of a debate with Bernie she had on their network.

And it was pretty obvious that the Party’s insiders favored Hillary. She benefited massively from superdelegates, which don’t exist in the RNC’s nomination process.

At least the Russians didn’t do the rigging, I guess?


Americans are ready to lock her up

Jon Bowne | – OCTOBER 30, 2017

Congress and the Justice Department are in a Deep State gridlock. Regardless of the fact that sitting on their laps is mountains of evidence that could potentially put Hillary and Bill Clinton away for good.

Mark Levin Show: Massive scandal! Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

This is the most interesting part of 10/24/2017 Mark Levin Show. An incredible revelation! Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that resulted in a now-famous dossier containing allegations about President Trump’s connections to Russia, people familiar with the matter said. This is a massive scandal now, the entire story has flipped. No wonder the Democrat party kept accusing the Trump campaign of collusion. They accuse of what they themselves have done. (audio from 10-24-2017)